{"title":"Initial gate leakage in ultra thin SiO/sub 2/ - the role of a brief stress","authors":"K.P. Cheung","doi":"10.1109/PPID.2003.1200938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For ultra thin oxide, the preferred plasma charging damage detection method has been narrowed down to initial gate leakage. The initial gate leakage measurement can in principle distinguish stress-induced-leakage-current (SILC) from soft breakdown if the test device is small. In a previous report, we showed that the expected sharp distinction between broken devices and non-broken devices does not exist when several devices are measured for very thin oxide. Here, the explanation for the lack of sharp distinction between broken and non-broken devices is provided with the support of new data. It is clear that there is a basic difference between plasma charging stress and bench-top electrical stress of ultra thin oxide. The results indicate that, to obtain a better measure of plasma charging damage using gate leakage, a brief stress is necessary.","PeriodicalId":196923,"journal":{"name":"2003 8th International Symposium Plasma- and Process-Induced Damage.","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2003 8th International Symposium Plasma- and Process-Induced Damage.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PPID.2003.1200938","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
For ultra thin oxide, the preferred plasma charging damage detection method has been narrowed down to initial gate leakage. The initial gate leakage measurement can in principle distinguish stress-induced-leakage-current (SILC) from soft breakdown if the test device is small. In a previous report, we showed that the expected sharp distinction between broken devices and non-broken devices does not exist when several devices are measured for very thin oxide. Here, the explanation for the lack of sharp distinction between broken and non-broken devices is provided with the support of new data. It is clear that there is a basic difference between plasma charging stress and bench-top electrical stress of ultra thin oxide. The results indicate that, to obtain a better measure of plasma charging damage using gate leakage, a brief stress is necessary.