Impacts of Random Telegraph Noise on FinFET devices, 6T SRAM cell, and logic circuits

M. Fan, V. Hu, Yin-Nien Chen, P. Su, C. Chuang
{"title":"Impacts of Random Telegraph Noise on FinFET devices, 6T SRAM cell, and logic circuits","authors":"M. Fan, V. Hu, Yin-Nien Chen, P. Su, C. Chuang","doi":"10.1109/IRPS.2012.6241886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyzes the impacts of single trap induced Random Telegraph Noise (RTN) on scaled FinFET devices in tied-gate and independent-gate modes, 6T SRAM cell and logic circuits. The dependence of RTN amplitude on trap location, EOT and temperature is evaluated through 3D atomistic TCAD simulations. It is observed that charged trap located near the bottom of sidewall (gate) interface, in the middle region between the source/drain results in most significant impact. EOT scaling and higher temperature improve the immunity to RTN. RTN degradation in independent-gate mode and the dependency on the location of the trap and current conduction path are analyzed. We show that planar BULK device, with larger Subthreshold Swing (S.S.) and comparable trap-induced VT shift (ΔVT), exhibits less nominal RTN degradation than FinFET for trap placed in the worst position. However, the larger variability and surface conduction characteristic of planar BULK device result in broader dispersion and larger worst-case degradation than FinFET with smaller variability and volume conduction inside the silicon fin. For FinFET 6T SRAM cell, the READ Static Noise Margin (RSNM) of 64 possible combinations from trapping/de-trapping in each cell transistor is examined. Because of reduced carriers with decreasing supply voltage (Vdd), the relative importance of RTN on the cell stability increases. The leakage/delay of FinFET inverter, 2-Way NAND and 2-To-1 multiplexer are investigated using mixed-mode TCAD simulations. The existence of RTN is found to cause ~24-27% and 13-15% variation in leakage and delay at Vdd=0.4V, respectively, for the logic circuits evaluated.","PeriodicalId":341663,"journal":{"name":"2012 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS)","volume":"1720 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IRPS.2012.6241886","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This paper analyzes the impacts of single trap induced Random Telegraph Noise (RTN) on scaled FinFET devices in tied-gate and independent-gate modes, 6T SRAM cell and logic circuits. The dependence of RTN amplitude on trap location, EOT and temperature is evaluated through 3D atomistic TCAD simulations. It is observed that charged trap located near the bottom of sidewall (gate) interface, in the middle region between the source/drain results in most significant impact. EOT scaling and higher temperature improve the immunity to RTN. RTN degradation in independent-gate mode and the dependency on the location of the trap and current conduction path are analyzed. We show that planar BULK device, with larger Subthreshold Swing (S.S.) and comparable trap-induced VT shift (ΔVT), exhibits less nominal RTN degradation than FinFET for trap placed in the worst position. However, the larger variability and surface conduction characteristic of planar BULK device result in broader dispersion and larger worst-case degradation than FinFET with smaller variability and volume conduction inside the silicon fin. For FinFET 6T SRAM cell, the READ Static Noise Margin (RSNM) of 64 possible combinations from trapping/de-trapping in each cell transistor is examined. Because of reduced carriers with decreasing supply voltage (Vdd), the relative importance of RTN on the cell stability increases. The leakage/delay of FinFET inverter, 2-Way NAND and 2-To-1 multiplexer are investigated using mixed-mode TCAD simulations. The existence of RTN is found to cause ~24-27% and 13-15% variation in leakage and delay at Vdd=0.4V, respectively, for the logic circuits evaluated.
随机电报噪声对FinFET器件、6T SRAM单元和逻辑电路的影响
本文分析了单阱诱导随机电报噪声(RTN)对固定门和独立门模式的缩放FinFET器件、6T SRAM单元和逻辑电路的影响。通过三维原子TCAD模拟,评估了RTN振幅对陷阱位置、EOT和温度的依赖性。结果表明,靠近边壁(栅极)界面底部、源漏之间的中间区域的带电疏水阀影响最大。EOT结垢和较高的温度提高了对RTN的免疫力。分析了独立栅极模式下RTN的退化及其与陷阱位置和电流传导路径的关系。我们发现,平面BULK器件具有更大的亚阈值摆幅(S.S.)和类似的陷阱诱导VT位移(ΔVT),当陷阱放置在最差位置时,其名义RTN退化比FinFET要小。然而,与具有较小可变性和硅片内体积传导的FinFET相比,平面BULK器件的较大可变性和表面传导特性导致更宽的色散和更大的最坏情况退化。对于FinFET 6T SRAM单元,研究了每个单元晶体管捕获/去捕获64种可能组合的READ静态噪声余量(RSNM)。随着供电电压(Vdd)的降低载流子的减少,RTN对电池稳定性的相对重要性增加。利用混合模式TCAD仿真研究了FinFET逆变器、2路NAND和2对1多路复用器的泄漏/延迟。在Vdd=0.4V时,RTN的存在对所评估的逻辑电路的泄漏和延迟分别造成~24-27%和13-15%的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信