{"title":"Comparison of MEMS variable optical attenuator designs","authors":"C. Marxer, B. de Jong, N. de Rooif","doi":"10.1109/OMEMS.2002.1031505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two micro electro mechanical systems (MEMS) - based electrical variable optical attenuator (eVOA) designs are discussed and compared with respect to polarization dependent loss (PDL) and wavelength dependent loss (WDL) characteristics. The first design is based on a shutter, whereas the second device works in reflection, where the movement of a mirror creates misalignment losses by steering the beam away from the core of the output fiber. The reflective-based design shows better PDL values typically below 0.1 dB at 10 dB attenuation. PDL values of the shutter-based design are 3.4 times higher, i.e. 0.5 dB around 10 dB. On the other hand the shutter design has less wavelength dependent loss.","PeriodicalId":285115,"journal":{"name":"IEEE/LEOS International Conference on Optical MEMs","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE/LEOS International Conference on Optical MEMs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/OMEMS.2002.1031505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28
Abstract
Two micro electro mechanical systems (MEMS) - based electrical variable optical attenuator (eVOA) designs are discussed and compared with respect to polarization dependent loss (PDL) and wavelength dependent loss (WDL) characteristics. The first design is based on a shutter, whereas the second device works in reflection, where the movement of a mirror creates misalignment losses by steering the beam away from the core of the output fiber. The reflective-based design shows better PDL values typically below 0.1 dB at 10 dB attenuation. PDL values of the shutter-based design are 3.4 times higher, i.e. 0.5 dB around 10 dB. On the other hand the shutter design has less wavelength dependent loss.