Comparison of MEMS variable optical attenuator designs

C. Marxer, B. de Jong, N. de Rooif
{"title":"Comparison of MEMS variable optical attenuator designs","authors":"C. Marxer, B. de Jong, N. de Rooif","doi":"10.1109/OMEMS.2002.1031505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two micro electro mechanical systems (MEMS) - based electrical variable optical attenuator (eVOA) designs are discussed and compared with respect to polarization dependent loss (PDL) and wavelength dependent loss (WDL) characteristics. The first design is based on a shutter, whereas the second device works in reflection, where the movement of a mirror creates misalignment losses by steering the beam away from the core of the output fiber. The reflective-based design shows better PDL values typically below 0.1 dB at 10 dB attenuation. PDL values of the shutter-based design are 3.4 times higher, i.e. 0.5 dB around 10 dB. On the other hand the shutter design has less wavelength dependent loss.","PeriodicalId":285115,"journal":{"name":"IEEE/LEOS International Conference on Optical MEMs","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE/LEOS International Conference on Optical MEMs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/OMEMS.2002.1031505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

Two micro electro mechanical systems (MEMS) - based electrical variable optical attenuator (eVOA) designs are discussed and compared with respect to polarization dependent loss (PDL) and wavelength dependent loss (WDL) characteristics. The first design is based on a shutter, whereas the second device works in reflection, where the movement of a mirror creates misalignment losses by steering the beam away from the core of the output fiber. The reflective-based design shows better PDL values typically below 0.1 dB at 10 dB attenuation. PDL values of the shutter-based design are 3.4 times higher, i.e. 0.5 dB around 10 dB. On the other hand the shutter design has less wavelength dependent loss.
MEMS可变光衰减器设计的比较
讨论了两种基于微机电系统(MEMS)的电可变光衰减器(eVOA)设计,并比较了偏振相关损耗(PDL)和波长相关损耗(WDL)特性。第一种设计是基于快门的,而第二种装置是基于反射的,镜子的运动通过引导光束远离输出光纤的核心而产生失调损失。基于反射的设计显示出更好的PDL值,通常在10 dB衰减时低于0.1 dB。基于快门的设计的PDL值高3.4倍,即在10 dB左右0.5 dB。另一方面,快门设计具有较小的波长相关损耗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信