{"title":"Wire bond development for high-pincount surface-mount","authors":"B. Shu","doi":"10.1109/ECTC.1992.204312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The continuous miniaturization of computers necessitates the use of new high pin count plastic packages such as TQFP (thin quad flat pack). These new package types, with 1.4-, 1.0-, or 0.8-mm plastic package body thickness, have very limited space for bond wire, specifically in the loop height dimension. This restriction imposes a challenge to the traditional wire bond technology, especially when long wire is needed for small die. The author reviews the constraints a thin plastic package imposes on wire bonding, and presents a statistical design of an experiment based on a response surface methodology to characterize wire loop profile control. Based on the regression equations generated, a mathematical model is established to guide the development of a predetermined loop profile suitable for thin plastic package assembly. The effects of major bonding parameters, such as wire length, kink-height, reverse loop, loop factor, bonding speeds, and wire tension, and their interactions on loop profile are analyzed.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":125270,"journal":{"name":"1992 Proceedings 42nd Electronic Components & Technology Conference","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1992 Proceedings 42nd Electronic Components & Technology Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTC.1992.204312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19
Abstract
The continuous miniaturization of computers necessitates the use of new high pin count plastic packages such as TQFP (thin quad flat pack). These new package types, with 1.4-, 1.0-, or 0.8-mm plastic package body thickness, have very limited space for bond wire, specifically in the loop height dimension. This restriction imposes a challenge to the traditional wire bond technology, especially when long wire is needed for small die. The author reviews the constraints a thin plastic package imposes on wire bonding, and presents a statistical design of an experiment based on a response surface methodology to characterize wire loop profile control. Based on the regression equations generated, a mathematical model is established to guide the development of a predetermined loop profile suitable for thin plastic package assembly. The effects of major bonding parameters, such as wire length, kink-height, reverse loop, loop factor, bonding speeds, and wire tension, and their interactions on loop profile are analyzed.<>