Let's revise the ASTM method F.459 for wirebonding process control

C. Pham, K. Huth
{"title":"Let's revise the ASTM method F.459 for wirebonding process control","authors":"C. Pham, K. Huth","doi":"10.1109/ISAOM.2001.916573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wire pull testing cannot be used to monitor wirebonding process control as the X-bar and R charts of row pull strength data routinely demonstrate wide variations. The bonding process appears to be out-of-control; indeed, the testing methodology and data collection itself are inaccurate in representing the process. Many factors, which are difficult to control in production, can subtly affect the raw SPC data. This paper reviews the pull test method used to identify the potential variation(s) that causes the errors and are misleading in the process control. The paper also includes the efforts to revise the ASTM's method F.459 for its pull test in making the data collected using this method applicable in the statistic process control (SPC) chart.","PeriodicalId":321904,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings International Symposium on Advanced Packaging Materials Processes, Properties and Interfaces (IEEE Cat. No.01TH8562)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings International Symposium on Advanced Packaging Materials Processes, Properties and Interfaces (IEEE Cat. No.01TH8562)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISAOM.2001.916573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Wire pull testing cannot be used to monitor wirebonding process control as the X-bar and R charts of row pull strength data routinely demonstrate wide variations. The bonding process appears to be out-of-control; indeed, the testing methodology and data collection itself are inaccurate in representing the process. Many factors, which are difficult to control in production, can subtly affect the raw SPC data. This paper reviews the pull test method used to identify the potential variation(s) that causes the errors and are misleading in the process control. The paper also includes the efforts to revise the ASTM's method F.459 for its pull test in making the data collected using this method applicable in the statistic process control (SPC) chart.
让我们修改ASTM方法F.459来进行线接过程控制
线拉力测试不能用于监控线接过程控制,因为线拉力强度数据的x -柱和R图通常显示出很大的变化。这种结合过程似乎已经失控;实际上,测试方法和数据收集本身在表示过程方面是不准确的。许多生产中难以控制的因素会潜移默化地影响SPC的原始数据。本文回顾了用于识别过程控制中引起误差和误导的潜在变化的拉试验方法。本文还包括修订ASTM的F.459方法的努力,以使使用该方法收集的数据适用于统计过程控制(SPC)图表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信