The Effect of Small Step Reading Method and Stepping Stone Method on The Ability of Beginning Reading of Elementary School Students

M. Hidayat, Wahyu Pambudy Astuti
{"title":"The Effect of Small Step Reading Method and Stepping Stone Method on The Ability of Beginning Reading of Elementary School Students","authors":"M. Hidayat, Wahyu Pambudy Astuti","doi":"10.4108/eai.7-8-2019.2288409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some factors influence the difficulty of students in beginning reading. One of them is the selection of the method. The purposes of this study are; (1) to determine the ability difference of beginning reading by spelling method and SSR (Small Step Reading) method (2) to determine the ability difference of beginning reading by spelling method and Stepping Stone method, and (3) to determine the more effective method between SSR method and Stepping Stone Method. This quantitative study was a quasi experiment with a nonequivalent control group design. Subjects of this study were 51 first grade students of Islamic Elementary School Gonilan (MI Muhammadiyah Gonilan), Central Java, Indonesia. Data collection did with some tests including normality with Saphiro Wilk test, homogeneity with F-test, as well as a hypothesis with t-test. The findings of this study showed; (1) there was an ability difference of beginning reading by spelling method and SSR (Small Step Reading) method (2) there was an ability difference of beginning reading by spelling method and Stepping Stone method, and (3) SSR method was more effective than Stepping Stone Method based on t-count (1.952) > t-table (1.676).","PeriodicalId":435700,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 4th Progressive and Fun Education International Conference, Profunedu 2019, 6-8 August 2019, Makassar, Indonesia","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 4th Progressive and Fun Education International Conference, Profunedu 2019, 6-8 August 2019, Makassar, Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.7-8-2019.2288409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Some factors influence the difficulty of students in beginning reading. One of them is the selection of the method. The purposes of this study are; (1) to determine the ability difference of beginning reading by spelling method and SSR (Small Step Reading) method (2) to determine the ability difference of beginning reading by spelling method and Stepping Stone method, and (3) to determine the more effective method between SSR method and Stepping Stone Method. This quantitative study was a quasi experiment with a nonequivalent control group design. Subjects of this study were 51 first grade students of Islamic Elementary School Gonilan (MI Muhammadiyah Gonilan), Central Java, Indonesia. Data collection did with some tests including normality with Saphiro Wilk test, homogeneity with F-test, as well as a hypothesis with t-test. The findings of this study showed; (1) there was an ability difference of beginning reading by spelling method and SSR (Small Step Reading) method (2) there was an ability difference of beginning reading by spelling method and Stepping Stone method, and (3) SSR method was more effective than Stepping Stone Method based on t-count (1.952) > t-table (1.676).
小台阶阅读法和踏脚石阅读法对小学生初级阅读能力的影响
影响学生初级阅读难度的因素有很多。其中之一是方法的选择。本研究的目的是:(1)确定用拼写法和SSR (Small Step reading)法开始阅读的能力差异(2)确定用拼写法和踏脚石法开始阅读的能力差异(3)确定SSR法和踏脚石法之间更有效的方法。本定量研究采用非等效对照组设计的准实验。本研究以印度尼西亚中爪哇省戈尼兰伊斯兰小学(MI Muhammadiyah Gonilan) 51名一年级学生为研究对象。数据收集使用了一些检验,包括使用sapiro Wilk检验的正态性,使用f检验的同质性以及使用t检验的假设。这项研究的结果表明;(1)拼字法和SSR (Small Step reading)法开始阅读的能力存在差异(2)拼字法和踏脚石法开始阅读的能力存在差异,(3)基于t-count (1.952) > t-table(1.676)计算,SSR法比踏脚石法更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信