Can We Use EDS to Determine Fluorine Contamination Level on A Normal Al Bondpad?

H. Younan
{"title":"Can We Use EDS to Determine Fluorine Contamination Level on A Normal Al Bondpad?","authors":"H. Younan","doi":"10.1109/IPFA.2018.8452520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IN this paper, the differences between EDS and AES are discussed. One can full understand what limitation of EDS technique is and why AES is better tool to determine F contamination on a normal Al bondpad. During application we cannot directly compare EDS result to AES result as EDS is a bulk analysis technique, while AES is surface analysis technique. For surface contamination analysis, a practice rule should be followed: “EDS clean is not clean” and “Auger clean is clean”. It is fully recommended for us to use AES to analyse and monitor surface F contamination level on a normal Al bondpad.","PeriodicalId":382811,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE International Symposium on the Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits (IPFA)","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE International Symposium on the Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits (IPFA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPFA.2018.8452520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

IN this paper, the differences between EDS and AES are discussed. One can full understand what limitation of EDS technique is and why AES is better tool to determine F contamination on a normal Al bondpad. During application we cannot directly compare EDS result to AES result as EDS is a bulk analysis technique, while AES is surface analysis technique. For surface contamination analysis, a practice rule should be followed: “EDS clean is not clean” and “Auger clean is clean”. It is fully recommended for us to use AES to analyse and monitor surface F contamination level on a normal Al bondpad.
我们能用能谱仪测定正常铝键板上的氟污染水平吗?
本文讨论了能谱法与AES法的区别。人们可以充分理解EDS技术的局限性,以及为什么AES是确定普通铝键合板上F污染的更好工具。在应用过程中,由于EDS是一种体分析技术,而AES是一种表面分析技术,我们不能直接将EDS结果与AES结果进行比较。对于表面污染分析,应遵循一个实践规则:“EDS清洁不清洁”和“俄钻清洁清洁”。我们完全推荐使用AES来分析和监测正常铝键板表面F污染水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信