Evitação do dolo por dirigentes de empresas nos delitos relacionados à atividade empresarial

Thomas Rönnau, Christian Becker
{"title":"Evitação do dolo por dirigentes de empresas nos delitos relacionados à atividade empresarial","authors":"Thomas Rönnau, Christian Becker","doi":"10.46274/1809-192xricp2022v7n1p24-45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In most of the corporate crimes, the managers are not directly involved in carrying out the criminal offense. However, they can be held responsible for omission, when they fail to take the necessary measures to prevent the criminal conducts committed by their subordinates. To establish that responsibility, they must have acted with criminal intent (dolus directus) or at least with dolus eventualis. In this article, the authors examine the conditions of mens rea in criminal omissions by company directors regarding facts carried out by their subordinates. After examining the legal definition of criminal intent, they especially highlight the requirements for its procedural determination. Finally, they describe the administrative liability of legal entities for the failure to control illegal acts of employees, a responsibility that does not depend on the intent of the managers.","PeriodicalId":159774,"journal":{"name":"Revista do Instituto de Ciências Penais","volume":"358 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista do Instituto de Ciências Penais","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46274/1809-192xricp2022v7n1p24-45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In most of the corporate crimes, the managers are not directly involved in carrying out the criminal offense. However, they can be held responsible for omission, when they fail to take the necessary measures to prevent the criminal conducts committed by their subordinates. To establish that responsibility, they must have acted with criminal intent (dolus directus) or at least with dolus eventualis. In this article, the authors examine the conditions of mens rea in criminal omissions by company directors regarding facts carried out by their subordinates. After examining the legal definition of criminal intent, they especially highlight the requirements for its procedural determination. Finally, they describe the administrative liability of legal entities for the failure to control illegal acts of employees, a responsibility that does not depend on the intent of the managers.
在与商业活动有关的犯罪中避免公司董事的欺诈行为
在大多数公司犯罪中,管理人员并不直接参与犯罪的实施。然而,当他们未能采取必要措施防止其下属犯下的犯罪行为时,他们可能会对疏忽负责。要确立该责任,他们必须具有犯罪意图(间接犯罪)或至少具有最终犯罪意图。在本文中,作者考察了公司董事对其下属实施的事实的刑事不作为的犯罪行为条件。在考察了犯罪意图的法律定义后,他们特别强调了其程序认定的要求。最后,他们描述了法人实体对未能控制员工违法行为的行政责任,这种责任不依赖于管理者的意图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信