Sobre a vida e sobrevida da teoria do bem jurídico: reflexões em diálogo com o livro “Ainda vive a teoria do bem jurídico?”, de Humberto Souza Santos

Hugo Soares
{"title":"Sobre a vida e sobrevida da teoria do bem jurídico: reflexões em diálogo com o livro “Ainda vive a teoria do bem jurídico?”, de Humberto Souza Santos","authors":"Hugo Soares","doi":"10.46274/1809-192xricp2022v7n1p190-209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Departing from the ideas presented in the recently published thesis by Humberto Souza Santos, this paper aims to promote a dialogue about the current state of the legal good’s theory (Rechtsgutslehre). To do so, a critical exam of both the work’s expository and propositional content is undertaken. Discussions about the limiting function of the legal good’s theory, its tensions with the democratic principle, and its vulnerability due to the consolidation of the category of remote harms are included in this context. Likewise, the paper analyzes the recognition of an imponderable sphere of individual autonomy, the upgrade of the requirement of a suitability nexus between the prohibited conduct and the legal good’s violation to the level of a criminalization’s criteria of legitimacy, and the densification of the concept of a legal good worthy of criminal protection. Ultimately, it concludes that the legal good’s theory remains alive and preserves its achievement potential, despite its need for improvements and complements.","PeriodicalId":159774,"journal":{"name":"Revista do Instituto de Ciências Penais","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista do Instituto de Ciências Penais","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46274/1809-192xricp2022v7n1p190-209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Departing from the ideas presented in the recently published thesis by Humberto Souza Santos, this paper aims to promote a dialogue about the current state of the legal good’s theory (Rechtsgutslehre). To do so, a critical exam of both the work’s expository and propositional content is undertaken. Discussions about the limiting function of the legal good’s theory, its tensions with the democratic principle, and its vulnerability due to the consolidation of the category of remote harms are included in this context. Likewise, the paper analyzes the recognition of an imponderable sphere of individual autonomy, the upgrade of the requirement of a suitability nexus between the prohibited conduct and the legal good’s violation to the level of a criminalization’s criteria of legitimacy, and the densification of the concept of a legal good worthy of criminal protection. Ultimately, it concludes that the legal good’s theory remains alive and preserves its achievement potential, despite its need for improvements and complements.
关于法律善理论的生存性和生存性:与《法律善理论还存在吗?》一书对话中的反思温贝托·索萨·桑托斯(Humberto Souza Santos)著
从Humberto Souza Santos最近发表的论文中提出的观点出发,本文旨在促进关于法律善理论(Rechtsgutslehre)现状的对话。要做到这一点,这两个工作的说明性和命题内容的关键考试进行。关于法律善理论的限制功能,它与民主原则的紧张关系,以及由于远程伤害类别的巩固而造成的脆弱性的讨论都包括在这一背景下。同样,本文分析了对不可估量的个人自治范围的承认,将被禁止的行为与违反法律物品之间的适当联系的要求提升到刑事化的合法性标准的水平,以及值得刑事保护的法律物品概念的具体化。最后,本文得出结论,尽管法律善的理论需要改进和补充,但它仍然存在并保留了其成就潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信