On hardware generation of random single input change test sequences

R. David, P. Girard, C. Landrault, S. Pravossoudovitch, A. Virazel
{"title":"On hardware generation of random single input change test sequences","authors":"R. David, P. Girard, C. Landrault, S. Pravossoudovitch, A. Virazel","doi":"10.1109/ETW.2001.946674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The combination of higher quality requirements and sensitivity of high performance circuits to delay defects has led to an increasing emphasis on delay testing of VLSI circuits. As delay testing using external testers requires expensive ATE, built-in self test (BIST) is an alternative technique that can significantly reduce the test cost. It has been proven that Single Input Change (SIC) test sequences are more effective than classical Multiple Input Change (MIC) test sequences when a high robust delay fault coverage is targeted. It has also been shown that random SIC (RSIC) test sequences achieve a higher fault coverage than random MIC (RMIC) test sequences when both robust and non robust tests are under consideration; the experimental results were based on a software generation of RSIC sequences that are easily generated. Obviously, a hardware RSIC generation providing similar results can be obtained. However, this hardware generator must be carefully designed. In this paper, it is explained what are the criteria which must be satisfied for this purpose. A solution is proposed and illustrated with an example. Then,it is shown that a bad result may be obtained if one of these criteria is not satisfied.","PeriodicalId":339694,"journal":{"name":"IEEE European Test Workshop, 2001.","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE European Test Workshop, 2001.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ETW.2001.946674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The combination of higher quality requirements and sensitivity of high performance circuits to delay defects has led to an increasing emphasis on delay testing of VLSI circuits. As delay testing using external testers requires expensive ATE, built-in self test (BIST) is an alternative technique that can significantly reduce the test cost. It has been proven that Single Input Change (SIC) test sequences are more effective than classical Multiple Input Change (MIC) test sequences when a high robust delay fault coverage is targeted. It has also been shown that random SIC (RSIC) test sequences achieve a higher fault coverage than random MIC (RMIC) test sequences when both robust and non robust tests are under consideration; the experimental results were based on a software generation of RSIC sequences that are easily generated. Obviously, a hardware RSIC generation providing similar results can be obtained. However, this hardware generator must be carefully designed. In this paper, it is explained what are the criteria which must be satisfied for this purpose. A solution is proposed and illustrated with an example. Then,it is shown that a bad result may be obtained if one of these criteria is not satisfied.
随机单输入变换测试序列的硬件生成
高性能电路对延迟缺陷的高质量要求和敏感性使得VLSI电路的延迟测试越来越受到重视。由于使用外部测试器进行延迟测试需要昂贵的ATE,内置自检(BIST)是一种可以显著降低测试成本的替代技术。事实证明,当目标是高鲁棒延迟故障覆盖率时,单输入变化(SIC)测试序列比经典的多输入变化(MIC)测试序列更有效。在考虑鲁棒性和非鲁棒性测试的情况下,随机SIC (RSIC)测试序列的故障覆盖率高于随机MIC (RMIC)测试序列;实验结果基于易于生成的RSIC序列的软件生成。显然,硬件RSIC生成可以提供类似的结果。然而,这个硬件生成器必须仔细设计。本文阐述了实现这一目标必须满足的标准。提出了一种解决方法,并用实例进行了说明。结果表明,如果不满足其中一个条件,可能会得到不好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信