Chemical analysis of semiconductor devices using TEM energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and electron energy-loss spectroscopy (EELS)

Jie Zhu, Y. Shen, S. Zhao
{"title":"Chemical analysis of semiconductor devices using TEM energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and electron energy-loss spectroscopy (EELS)","authors":"Jie Zhu, Y. Shen, S. Zhao","doi":"10.1109/IPFA.2016.7564254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we discussed the challenges of chemical analysis using TEM energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and electron-energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) for semiconductor devices. In the first case study, we showed that EDS peak overlapping and Bremsstrahlung background may cause false “signals” during defect element analysis. The problem can be solved using the EDS full quantification analysis instead of the conventional raw intensity integration method. In the second example, we described how to enhance the contrast of defect mapping using EELS spectrum imaging or jump ratio method. In the third example, EELS oxygen K-edge chemical shift and energy-loss near edge structure (ELNES) were used to characterize oxidized Ta thin film deposited on SiO2. In this case, EDS technique failed because of poor energy resolution and electron beam spreading effect. In the last case, plasmons in the EELS low-loss region were used to identify different nickel silicide phases in a thin film. Other techniques such as selected area diffraction (SAD) and nano-beam diffraction (NBD) are limited by the area-selection aperture size or specimen tilting. It is also shown that non-linear least square Gaussian fitting can be used to resolve the spectrum recorded at the interface.","PeriodicalId":206237,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE 23rd International Symposium on the Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits (IPFA)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE 23rd International Symposium on the Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits (IPFA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPFA.2016.7564254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this paper, we discussed the challenges of chemical analysis using TEM energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and electron-energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) for semiconductor devices. In the first case study, we showed that EDS peak overlapping and Bremsstrahlung background may cause false “signals” during defect element analysis. The problem can be solved using the EDS full quantification analysis instead of the conventional raw intensity integration method. In the second example, we described how to enhance the contrast of defect mapping using EELS spectrum imaging or jump ratio method. In the third example, EELS oxygen K-edge chemical shift and energy-loss near edge structure (ELNES) were used to characterize oxidized Ta thin film deposited on SiO2. In this case, EDS technique failed because of poor energy resolution and electron beam spreading effect. In the last case, plasmons in the EELS low-loss region were used to identify different nickel silicide phases in a thin film. Other techniques such as selected area diffraction (SAD) and nano-beam diffraction (NBD) are limited by the area-selection aperture size or specimen tilting. It is also shown that non-linear least square Gaussian fitting can be used to resolve the spectrum recorded at the interface.
利用TEM能量色散x射线能谱(EDS)和电子能量损失能谱(EELS)对半导体器件进行化学分析
在本文中,我们讨论了使用TEM能量色散x射线光谱(EDS)和电子能量损失光谱(EELS)对半导体器件进行化学分析的挑战。在第一个案例研究中,我们发现EDS峰重叠和轫致辐射背景可能会在缺陷元素分析过程中产生错误的“信号”。采用能谱全量化分析代替传统的原始强度积分法可以解决这一问题。在第二个例子中,我们描述了如何使用EELS光谱成像或跳比方法来增强缺陷映射的对比度。在第三个例子中,利用EELS氧k边化学位移和能量损失近边结构(ELNES)表征了沉积在SiO2上的氧化Ta薄膜。在这种情况下,由于能量分辨率差和电子束扩散效应,EDS技术失败了。在最后一种情况下,等离子体激元在EELS低损耗区被用来识别不同相的硅化镍薄膜。其他技术,如选择区域衍射(SAD)和纳米束衍射(NBD)受到区域选择孔径大小或试样倾斜的限制。结果表明,非线性最小二乘高斯拟合可以对界面处记录的光谱进行解析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信