L. Fang, C. Bachelet, I. Sagnes, G. Beaudoin, J. Oudar
{"title":"Ion implanted In0.53Ga0.47As for ultrafast saturable absorber device at 1.55 μm","authors":"L. Fang, C. Bachelet, I. Sagnes, G. Beaudoin, J. Oudar","doi":"10.1109/ICIPRM.2014.6880581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Iron (Fe) ion implantation with post-annealing was used to shorten the carrier lifetime of In0.53Ga0.47As-based saturable absorber due to an effective Fe3+/Fe2+ trap level. The modulation depth and the nonsaturable loss were investigated. Moreover, we found that the saturation of Fe-related trap level at high excited carrier density can be avoided by introducing Zn dopant in InGaAs. Furthermore, by comparing As and Fe-implanted InGaAs samples, we found that Fe2+/Fe3+ is more effective as a trap center for electrons and holes, while ionized As is a trap center only for electrons in InGaAs.","PeriodicalId":181494,"journal":{"name":"26th International Conference on Indium Phosphide and Related Materials (IPRM)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"26th International Conference on Indium Phosphide and Related Materials (IPRM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIPRM.2014.6880581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Iron (Fe) ion implantation with post-annealing was used to shorten the carrier lifetime of In0.53Ga0.47As-based saturable absorber due to an effective Fe3+/Fe2+ trap level. The modulation depth and the nonsaturable loss were investigated. Moreover, we found that the saturation of Fe-related trap level at high excited carrier density can be avoided by introducing Zn dopant in InGaAs. Furthermore, by comparing As and Fe-implanted InGaAs samples, we found that Fe2+/Fe3+ is more effective as a trap center for electrons and holes, while ionized As is a trap center only for electrons in InGaAs.