Integrating design, manufacture and test using capability measures

J. M. Gilbert
{"title":"Integrating design, manufacture and test using capability measures","authors":"J. M. Gilbert","doi":"10.1109/ESTC.2008.4684479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Successful electronic products rely on a combination of good design, appropriate manufacturing processes and effective test and inspection. In order to achieve all of these within a highly cost constrained environment requires that sufficient, but not excessive, resources are applied to each area. One problem which makes it difficult to balance the allocation of resources is that different measures of performance are used in each context. In the design domain, the objectives are typically design centring, robust design, part count reduction or component cost reduction. Objectives in manufacturing processes are typically yield maximisation, process capability, defect reduction etc. In the test arena, the aim is typically to maximise test coverage and minimising test/inspection times. Given this plethora of different measures of performance, it is difficult to assess trade-offs between different domains and decide appropriate resource allocations.In order to address this problem we have proposed a unified measure of capability across the design/manufacture/test spectrum. This is based on the process capability measure Cpk which has been adapted to measure functional capability: the ability of a design to meet its performance specification in the presence of component parameter variations, and to test capability: the ability of test/inspection processes to correctly identify defects without erroneously indicating defects which are not present. These capability measures may be related to the costs arising from defects through scrap, rework and warranty returns through a failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) and a quality cost mapping process. This makes it possible to quantify and compare the cost consequences of design decisions. This unifying analysis methodology is termed electronic conformability analysis (eCA). The paper introduces the eCA methodology, explains the functional, manufacture and test capability measures and shows how these may be related to quality cost. The application of the methodology to a simple example circuit is presented.","PeriodicalId":146584,"journal":{"name":"2008 2nd Electronics System-Integration Technology Conference","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 2nd Electronics System-Integration Technology Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESTC.2008.4684479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Successful electronic products rely on a combination of good design, appropriate manufacturing processes and effective test and inspection. In order to achieve all of these within a highly cost constrained environment requires that sufficient, but not excessive, resources are applied to each area. One problem which makes it difficult to balance the allocation of resources is that different measures of performance are used in each context. In the design domain, the objectives are typically design centring, robust design, part count reduction or component cost reduction. Objectives in manufacturing processes are typically yield maximisation, process capability, defect reduction etc. In the test arena, the aim is typically to maximise test coverage and minimising test/inspection times. Given this plethora of different measures of performance, it is difficult to assess trade-offs between different domains and decide appropriate resource allocations.In order to address this problem we have proposed a unified measure of capability across the design/manufacture/test spectrum. This is based on the process capability measure Cpk which has been adapted to measure functional capability: the ability of a design to meet its performance specification in the presence of component parameter variations, and to test capability: the ability of test/inspection processes to correctly identify defects without erroneously indicating defects which are not present. These capability measures may be related to the costs arising from defects through scrap, rework and warranty returns through a failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) and a quality cost mapping process. This makes it possible to quantify and compare the cost consequences of design decisions. This unifying analysis methodology is termed electronic conformability analysis (eCA). The paper introduces the eCA methodology, explains the functional, manufacture and test capability measures and shows how these may be related to quality cost. The application of the methodology to a simple example circuit is presented.
运用能力测量整合设计、制造和测试
成功的电子产品依赖于良好的设计,适当的制造工艺和有效的测试和检验的结合。为了在成本高度限制的环境中实现所有这些目标,需要在每个领域应用足够的资源,而不是过度的资源。使平衡资源分配变得困难的一个问题是,在每个上下文中使用了不同的性能度量。在设计领域,目标通常是以设计为中心、稳健设计、减少零件数量或降低组件成本。制造过程的目标通常是产量最大化,工艺能力,减少缺陷等。在测试领域,目标通常是最大化测试覆盖率和最小化测试/检查时间。考虑到如此多的不同性能度量,很难评估不同领域之间的权衡并决定适当的资源分配。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了一个跨设计/制造/测试范围的能力的统一度量。这是基于过程能力度量Cpk,它已被用于度量功能能力:在组件参数变化的情况下,设计满足其性能规范的能力;以及测试能力:测试/检查过程正确识别缺陷而不错误指示不存在缺陷的能力。这些能力度量可能与通过失效模式和影响分析(FMEA)和质量成本映射过程产生的缺陷、返工和保修退货产生的成本相关。这使得量化和比较设计决策的成本结果成为可能。这种统一的分析方法被称为电子一致性分析(eCA)。本文介绍了eCA方法,解释了功能、制造和测试能力度量,并说明了这些度量如何与质量成本相关。最后给出了该方法在一个简单电路实例中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信