Comparison of Au/Al, Cu/Al and Ag/Al in wirebonding assembly and IMC growth behavior

N. Jaafar, Eva Wai Leong Ching
{"title":"Comparison of Au/Al, Cu/Al and Ag/Al in wirebonding assembly and IMC growth behavior","authors":"N. Jaafar, Eva Wai Leong Ching","doi":"10.1109/EPTC.2016.7861432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, semiconductor packaging is using Gold (Au) wirebonding as the main connection from chip to the lead frame or substrate. Increases in Au price, causes suppliers to look at another alternative wire alloy as such Copper (Cu) wire. Cu wire is another option rather than Au wire due to Cu has higher tensile strength, better elongation and electrical and thermal conductivities. Cu wire has outstanding ball neck strength after the ball formation process [1], high-loop stability and high stiffness, which results in lower wire sweeping during encapsulation. These will lead to Cu wire able to have longer, lower loop profiles [2] and minimize wire sagging for fine and ultra-fine pitch wirebonding application. Another proposed alloy for wire bonding is Silver (Ag) wire. Ag has the best electrical and thermal conductivities compare to the three kinds of wires material. Ag wire has low Young's modulus compare to Cu and it is another option for replacing Au wire in wirebonding. In this paper, we shall discuss the three types of alloy wire in term of comparing the bonding quality. These will include the disadvantages and advantages of individual by comparing ball shear measurement. The silicon chip surface after bonding will be checked to confirm any crack observed on the bond pad surface occurred after ball shear for each type of wire. IMC growth for the three types of wire will be carried out at 175°C for 0hr to 504hrs will be discuss and the bond interface will be observed using the high power optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM).","PeriodicalId":136525,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE 18th Electronics Packaging Technology Conference (EPTC)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE 18th Electronics Packaging Technology Conference (EPTC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EPTC.2016.7861432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Currently, semiconductor packaging is using Gold (Au) wirebonding as the main connection from chip to the lead frame or substrate. Increases in Au price, causes suppliers to look at another alternative wire alloy as such Copper (Cu) wire. Cu wire is another option rather than Au wire due to Cu has higher tensile strength, better elongation and electrical and thermal conductivities. Cu wire has outstanding ball neck strength after the ball formation process [1], high-loop stability and high stiffness, which results in lower wire sweeping during encapsulation. These will lead to Cu wire able to have longer, lower loop profiles [2] and minimize wire sagging for fine and ultra-fine pitch wirebonding application. Another proposed alloy for wire bonding is Silver (Ag) wire. Ag has the best electrical and thermal conductivities compare to the three kinds of wires material. Ag wire has low Young's modulus compare to Cu and it is another option for replacing Au wire in wirebonding. In this paper, we shall discuss the three types of alloy wire in term of comparing the bonding quality. These will include the disadvantages and advantages of individual by comparing ball shear measurement. The silicon chip surface after bonding will be checked to confirm any crack observed on the bond pad surface occurred after ball shear for each type of wire. IMC growth for the three types of wire will be carried out at 175°C for 0hr to 504hrs will be discuss and the bond interface will be observed using the high power optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
Au/Al, Cu/Al和Ag/Al在线键组装中的比较及IMC生长行为
目前,半导体封装使用金(Au)线键作为从芯片到引线框架或基板的主要连接。金的价格上涨,导致供应商寻找另一种替代金属丝合金,如铜(Cu)金属丝。铜丝是另一种选择,而不是金丝,因为铜具有更高的抗拉强度,更好的伸长率和导电性和导热性。铜丝在成球过程后具有突出的球颈强度[1],高回路稳定性和高刚度,封装过程中扫线率较低。这将导致铜线能够具有更长,更低的环轮廓[2],并最大限度地减少电线下垂,用于细间距和超细间距的线键合应用。另一种建议的合金是银(Ag)线。银的导电性和导热性是三种导线材料中最好的。与铜相比,银丝的杨氏模量较低,是在线键合中取代金丝的另一种选择。本文将讨论三种类型的合金丝的结合质量的比较。这些将包括缺点和优点的个别比较球剪测量。对粘接后的硅片表面进行检查,确认每一种线材在粘接垫表面发生球剪后是否出现裂纹。三种类型的金属丝的IMC生长将在175°C下进行0小时至504小时的讨论,并将使用高功率光学显微镜和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)观察键合界面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信