A Practical Comparison of Mask Making Pattern Generation Systems

K. Hensley
{"title":"A Practical Comparison of Mask Making Pattern Generation Systems","authors":"K. Hensley","doi":"10.1109/UGIM.2012.6247106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A Practical Comparison of Mask Making Pattern Generation Systems Kevin Hensley Utah Nanofab, College of Engineering, University of Utah Category: Equipment acquisition, capability development Three mask making systems utilizing different pattern generation technologies were evaluated. The systems include laser direct write (Heidelberg MicroPG), variable aperture UV mercury arc lamp exposure (Electromask CC250), and UV lamp DLP projection (IMP Xpress). A test pattern was exposed on each system and measurements and images were acquired and compared. Results show that the laser direct-write system is preferred for both curved shapes and high-resolution features. Additionally, maintenance and facility costs where evaluated for all systems.","PeriodicalId":347838,"journal":{"name":"2012 19th Biennial University/Government/Industry, Micro/Nano Symposium (UGIM)","volume":"395 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 19th Biennial University/Government/Industry, Micro/Nano Symposium (UGIM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/UGIM.2012.6247106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A Practical Comparison of Mask Making Pattern Generation Systems Kevin Hensley Utah Nanofab, College of Engineering, University of Utah Category: Equipment acquisition, capability development Three mask making systems utilizing different pattern generation technologies were evaluated. The systems include laser direct write (Heidelberg MicroPG), variable aperture UV mercury arc lamp exposure (Electromask CC250), and UV lamp DLP projection (IMP Xpress). A test pattern was exposed on each system and measurements and images were acquired and compared. Results show that the laser direct-write system is preferred for both curved shapes and high-resolution features. Additionally, maintenance and facility costs where evaluated for all systems.
掩模制作模式生成系统的实用比较
本文对三种采用不同模式生成技术的掩模制作系统进行了评价。该系统包括激光直接写入(Heidelberg MicroPG),可变孔径紫外汞弧灯曝光(Electromask CC250)和紫外灯DLP投影(IMP Xpress)。在每个系统上暴露一个测试模式,并获得测量值和图像并进行比较。结果表明,激光直写系统对于曲面形状和高分辨率特征都是首选的。此外,对所有系统的维护和设施成本进行了评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信