Are current turbulence modeling practices addressing industry's needs for electronics thermal design?

P. Rodgers, V. Eveloy
{"title":"Are current turbulence modeling practices addressing industry's needs for electronics thermal design?","authors":"P. Rodgers, V. Eveloy","doi":"10.1109/ESIME.2010.5464509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the 1990's, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has been widely adopted in the electronics industry for the thermal design of electronic products. Its advantages in terms of product improvements and enhanced productivity of design analysis, are undisputed. However, the industry has also experienced that incorrect product design decisions can be taken as a result of inaccurate CFD predictions, with consequences ranging from reduced product performance and reliability, to catastrophic field failure. Consequently, understanding and minimizing CFD prediction errors is a major concern to ensure a return on capital, software and human resource investments in the thermal design process. Sources of CFD inaccuracy can be categorized as either (i) errors of a numerical (e.g., round-offs, convergence, discretization), coding-, or user nature, or (ii) uncertainties in model inputs (e.g., limited information or approximations in the representation of geometry, material properties, and boundary conditions such as fan flows and screen losses) and in physical models (e.g., representation of physical processes such as turbulence, simplifying assumptions such as steady-state analysis or adiabatic heat transfer boundary). Assuming that the CFD code is correct and that user errors are negligible, this Talk focuses on two unvoidable sources of CFD prediction errors, and candidate solutions to minimize them: (a) physical model uncertainties associated with current Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) turbulence modeling, and (b) input uncertainties associated with boundary conditions such as fan flows. In relation to topic (a), an overview of the current state-of-the-art in CFD for electronics cooling applications is presented, as well as published CFD benchmarks relating to air- and liquid cooling applications. The challenges for improved predictive accuracy are outlined in the context of two opposing arguments relating to physical model uncertainties: (i) the development and optimization of turbulence models for limited categories of flows, versus (ii) the search for a comprehensive, general-purpose turbulent flow model. With respect to topic (b), the fact that detailed modeling inputs are generally not available during the design phase, may no longer justify the view that standard turbulence models applied on simple grids are satisfactory, offer efficient analysis and solution stability. This argument may become outdated with increases in computational power, which will facilitate the application of more sophisticated turbulence models to electronic system thermal design. To illustrate the difficulties typically encountered in the industry to predict heat transfer and fluid flow in electronic systems, a benchmark study of an air-cooled mock-up telecommunication unit is presented. The case study highlights substantial CFD prediction discrepandies with experimental measurements of temperature and fluid flow, which are found to be associated with uncertainties in fan performance characteristic curve, and physical modeling of turbulent flows, including fan-induced flows. Finally, the lack of benchmark studies reporting large but actual CFD prediction discrepancies is emphasized, highlighting the need for realistic benchmarks.","PeriodicalId":152004,"journal":{"name":"2010 11th International Thermal, Mechanical & Multi-Physics Simulation, and Experiments in Microelectronics and Microsystems (EuroSimE)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 11th International Thermal, Mechanical & Multi-Physics Simulation, and Experiments in Microelectronics and Microsystems (EuroSimE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESIME.2010.5464509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the 1990's, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has been widely adopted in the electronics industry for the thermal design of electronic products. Its advantages in terms of product improvements and enhanced productivity of design analysis, are undisputed. However, the industry has also experienced that incorrect product design decisions can be taken as a result of inaccurate CFD predictions, with consequences ranging from reduced product performance and reliability, to catastrophic field failure. Consequently, understanding and minimizing CFD prediction errors is a major concern to ensure a return on capital, software and human resource investments in the thermal design process. Sources of CFD inaccuracy can be categorized as either (i) errors of a numerical (e.g., round-offs, convergence, discretization), coding-, or user nature, or (ii) uncertainties in model inputs (e.g., limited information or approximations in the representation of geometry, material properties, and boundary conditions such as fan flows and screen losses) and in physical models (e.g., representation of physical processes such as turbulence, simplifying assumptions such as steady-state analysis or adiabatic heat transfer boundary). Assuming that the CFD code is correct and that user errors are negligible, this Talk focuses on two unvoidable sources of CFD prediction errors, and candidate solutions to minimize them: (a) physical model uncertainties associated with current Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) turbulence modeling, and (b) input uncertainties associated with boundary conditions such as fan flows. In relation to topic (a), an overview of the current state-of-the-art in CFD for electronics cooling applications is presented, as well as published CFD benchmarks relating to air- and liquid cooling applications. The challenges for improved predictive accuracy are outlined in the context of two opposing arguments relating to physical model uncertainties: (i) the development and optimization of turbulence models for limited categories of flows, versus (ii) the search for a comprehensive, general-purpose turbulent flow model. With respect to topic (b), the fact that detailed modeling inputs are generally not available during the design phase, may no longer justify the view that standard turbulence models applied on simple grids are satisfactory, offer efficient analysis and solution stability. This argument may become outdated with increases in computational power, which will facilitate the application of more sophisticated turbulence models to electronic system thermal design. To illustrate the difficulties typically encountered in the industry to predict heat transfer and fluid flow in electronic systems, a benchmark study of an air-cooled mock-up telecommunication unit is presented. The case study highlights substantial CFD prediction discrepandies with experimental measurements of temperature and fluid flow, which are found to be associated with uncertainties in fan performance characteristic curve, and physical modeling of turbulent flows, including fan-induced flows. Finally, the lack of benchmark studies reporting large but actual CFD prediction discrepancies is emphasized, highlighting the need for realistic benchmarks.
当前的湍流建模实践是否满足了电子热设计行业的需求?
自20世纪90年代以来,计算流体动力学(CFD)在电子工业中被广泛应用于电子产品的热设计。它在产品改进和提高设计分析生产力方面的优势是无可争议的。然而,该行业也经历过由于不准确的CFD预测而导致不正确的产品设计决策,从而导致产品性能和可靠性降低,甚至导致灾难性的现场故障。因此,了解并最小化CFD预测误差是确保热设计过程中资本、软件和人力资源投资回报的主要关注点。CFD不准确性的来源可以分为(i)数值误差(例如,舍入、收敛、离散化)、编码或用户性质的误差,或(ii)模型输入中的不确定性(例如,几何形状、材料特性和边界条件(如风扇流动和屏幕损失)的表示中的有限信息或近似)和物理模型中的不确定性(例如,物理过程的表示,如湍流、简化假设(如稳态分析或绝热传热边界)。假设CFD代码是正确的,并且用户错误可以忽略不计,本演讲将重点讨论CFD预测误差的两个不可避免的来源,以及最小化它们的候选解决方案:(a)与当前reynolds -平均Navier-Stokes (RANS)湍流建模相关的物理模型不确定性,以及(b)与边界条件(如风扇流)相关的输入不确定性。关于主题(a),概述了当前电子冷却应用中最先进的CFD技术,以及与空气和液体冷却应用相关的已发布的CFD基准。在与物理模型不确定性有关的两种对立论点的背景下,概述了提高预测精度的挑战:(i)为有限类别的流动开发和优化湍流模型,与(ii)寻找全面的,通用的湍流模型。关于主题(b),在设计阶段通常无法获得详细的建模输入,这一事实可能不再证明在简单网格上应用标准湍流模型是令人满意的,可以提供有效的分析和解的稳定性。随着计算能力的提高,这一论点可能会变得过时,这将有助于将更复杂的湍流模型应用于电子系统热设计。为了说明行业中预测电子系统中的传热和流体流动通常遇到的困难,本文介绍了一个风冷式通信单元模型的基准研究。该案例研究强调了CFD预测与温度和流体流动的实验测量之间的巨大差异,这与风扇性能特征曲线的不确定性以及湍流(包括风扇诱导的流动)的物理建模有关。最后,本文强调了缺乏报告较大但实际的CFD预测差异的基准研究,强调了现实基准的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信