The use of interactive whiteboard drawing and concept/mind mapping to promote active learning in online/hybrid classes – a case study for science education

Kim-hung Lam, Wai Ki Vicky Chan, Long-yung Ivan Chung, Wai-chun Boris Leung, Kwong-chak Gary Cheung, Yoon-suk Lawrence Lee, Wing-yiu Yu
{"title":"The use of interactive whiteboard drawing and concept/mind mapping to promote active learning in online/hybrid classes – a case study for science education","authors":"Kim-hung Lam, Wai Ki Vicky Chan, Long-yung Ivan Chung, Wai-chun Boris Leung, Kwong-chak Gary Cheung, Yoon-suk Lawrence Lee, Wing-yiu Yu","doi":"10.1109/TALE54877.2022.00110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic has upended the conventional mode of class delivery. With the need to maintain social distancing and strict quarantine measures for local and non-local students, all teaching activities must be conducted in online mode, which in turn limited the interaction among students and instructors. In this study, we reported the use of interactive whiteboard on facilitating teaching and learning activities via drawing and handwriting during 2021/2022 Semester 1,2 and 3 (9/2021 to 6/2022). In general, nonprogramme major (NPM) students (ABCT1D09 and ABCT1D10) were satisfied with the use of interactive whiteboard with average score over 4.0, where more than 80% of them chose 4 and 5. For programme-major (PM) students (ABCT1742, ABCT3623 and ABCT4752), they were mostly satisfied with the use of interactive whiteboard with average score over 3.3, where more than 57% of them chose 4 and 5. To conclude, both NPM and PM students were satisfied with the use of interactive whiteboard during learning with overall average score around 4.0, where greater than 74% of them chose 4 and 5.","PeriodicalId":369501,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE)","volume":"255 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE54877.2022.00110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has upended the conventional mode of class delivery. With the need to maintain social distancing and strict quarantine measures for local and non-local students, all teaching activities must be conducted in online mode, which in turn limited the interaction among students and instructors. In this study, we reported the use of interactive whiteboard on facilitating teaching and learning activities via drawing and handwriting during 2021/2022 Semester 1,2 and 3 (9/2021 to 6/2022). In general, nonprogramme major (NPM) students (ABCT1D09 and ABCT1D10) were satisfied with the use of interactive whiteboard with average score over 4.0, where more than 80% of them chose 4 and 5. For programme-major (PM) students (ABCT1742, ABCT3623 and ABCT4752), they were mostly satisfied with the use of interactive whiteboard with average score over 3.3, where more than 57% of them chose 4 and 5. To conclude, both NPM and PM students were satisfied with the use of interactive whiteboard during learning with overall average score around 4.0, where greater than 74% of them chose 4 and 5.
利用互动白板绘图和概念/思维导图促进在线/混合课程的主动学习-科学教育的个案研究
2019冠状病毒病大流行颠覆了传统的课堂教学模式。由于需要保持社交距离,并对本地和非本地学生采取严格的隔离措施,所有教学活动都必须在线进行,这限制了学生和教师之间的互动。在这项研究中,我们报告了在2021/2022学期(2021年9月至2022年6月)的第一学期、第二学期和第三学期(2021年9月至2022年6月),使用交互式白板促进绘画和手写的教学活动。总体而言,非程序专业(NPM)学生(ABCT1D09和ABCT1D10)对交互式白板的使用感到满意,平均得分在4.0以上,其中超过80%的学生选择了4和5。对于项目专业(PM)学生(ABCT1742, ABCT3623和ABCT4752),他们对交互式白板的使用最满意,平均得分在3.3以上,其中超过57%的人选择了4和5。综上所述,NPM和PM学生在学习过程中对交互式白板的使用都很满意,总体平均得分在4.0左右,其中超过74%的学生选择了4和5。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信