Political ramification on educational policy in colonial kenya

Ngeno Kipkemoi Robert, Samson O. Barasa, J. Chang’ach
{"title":"Political ramification on educational policy in colonial kenya","authors":"Ngeno Kipkemoi Robert, Samson O. Barasa, J. Chang’ach","doi":"10.24297/ijrem.v11i.8788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Colonial educational policies were marked by conflicting interests of different actors who were involved in the provision and consumption of education. Initially, education matters were left to individual colonies and voluntary agencies, but from 1925, Whitehall began to take a keen interest in the development of education in the colonies. Several educational policies were enacted, including Fraser report, the East African Protectorate Education Commission in Kenya, Phelps-stoke commission, Memorandum on education policy in British Tropical Africa, Beecher committee of 1949 and Binns committee report of 1952. These policies sought to inculcate western morals, technical skills, and the need for rural advancement. Africans did not contend with recommendations of these commissions; therefore, several institutions emerged that sought to improve educational conditions for Africans, such as political associations, Local Native councils, and Independent school associations. Data for this study was collected qualitatively; this involved both primary and secondary sources of data. The results of the study indicate that politics has a direct influence on educational policy. The study will be significant to educational stakeholders, educational policy developers, and planners, educational historians and will be used as a basis for teaching politics and education in colonial Kenya and for future research in the history of education.","PeriodicalId":247415,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research in Education Methodology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Research in Education Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24297/ijrem.v11i.8788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Colonial educational policies were marked by conflicting interests of different actors who were involved in the provision and consumption of education. Initially, education matters were left to individual colonies and voluntary agencies, but from 1925, Whitehall began to take a keen interest in the development of education in the colonies. Several educational policies were enacted, including Fraser report, the East African Protectorate Education Commission in Kenya, Phelps-stoke commission, Memorandum on education policy in British Tropical Africa, Beecher committee of 1949 and Binns committee report of 1952. These policies sought to inculcate western morals, technical skills, and the need for rural advancement. Africans did not contend with recommendations of these commissions; therefore, several institutions emerged that sought to improve educational conditions for Africans, such as political associations, Local Native councils, and Independent school associations. Data for this study was collected qualitatively; this involved both primary and secondary sources of data. The results of the study indicate that politics has a direct influence on educational policy. The study will be significant to educational stakeholders, educational policy developers, and planners, educational historians and will be used as a basis for teaching politics and education in colonial Kenya and for future research in the history of education.
殖民时期肯尼亚教育政策的政治分支
殖民地教育政策的特点是参与提供和消费教育的不同行为者之间的利益冲突。起初,教育事务由个别殖民地和志愿机构负责,但从1925年起,白厅开始对殖民地的教育发展产生浓厚的兴趣。制定了几项教育政策,包括弗雷泽报告、肯尼亚东非保护国教育委员会、菲尔普斯-斯托克委员会、英属热带非洲教育政策备忘录、1949年比彻委员会和1952年宾斯委员会报告。这些政策试图灌输西方的道德、技术技能和农村发展的需要。非洲人并不反对这些委员会的建议;因此,出现了一些寻求改善非洲人教育条件的机构,如政治协会、地方土著理事会和独立学校协会。本研究的数据是定性收集的;这涉及到主要和次要的数据来源。研究结果表明,政治对教育政策有直接的影响。这项研究将对教育利益相关者、教育政策制定者和规划者、教育历史学家具有重要意义,并将作为肯尼亚殖民地政治和教育教学的基础,并为未来的教育史研究奠定基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信