Psychosocial combined with methadone maintenance treatments versus methadone maintenance treatments alone for treatment of opioid use disorder: A meta-analysis.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Journal of Addictive Diseases Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-06 DOI:10.1080/10550887.2022.2158664
Chengbin Liu, Yangyang Li
{"title":"Psychosocial combined with methadone maintenance treatments versus methadone maintenance treatments alone for treatment of opioid use disorder: A meta-analysis.","authors":"Chengbin Liu, Yangyang Li","doi":"10.1080/10550887.2022.2158664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Psychosocial combined with methadone maintenance treatment aimed at opioid use disorder is effective, but the efficacy of the psychosocial intervention in such treatment is questionable.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of psychosocial plus methadone maintenance treatment versus methadone maintenance treatment alone for opioid use disorder in improving treatment retention and reducing drug use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An exhaustive literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL, China National Knowledge Infrastructure database, \"the Wan Fang database, the VIP database, and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database\", and randomized controlled trials were identified from their inception to February 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four studies were included. The results of this meta-analysis showed that adding any psychosocial treatment to standard methadone maintenance treatment significantly improved the illicit drug use during the treatment relative risk (RR) 0.62 (95% CI 0.48 to 0.79), and retention in treatment RR 1.18 (95% CI 1.11 to 1.25). No statistically significant additional benefit was detected in terms of retention at follow-up RR 1.08 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.22).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present evidence suggests that adding psychosocial intervention to methadone maintenance treatment significantly improves the nonuse of opioids and retention in treatment. It should be noted that psychosocial treatment is only beneficial for methadone treatment when methadone is provided in subtherapeutic doses. Additionally, the finding about the improvement effect of retention at follow-up did not achieve statistical significance. Due to the diversity of outcome indicators in relevant original studies, the included studies are limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":47493,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addictive Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"126-135"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Addictive Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10550887.2022.2158664","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Psychosocial combined with methadone maintenance treatment aimed at opioid use disorder is effective, but the efficacy of the psychosocial intervention in such treatment is questionable.

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of psychosocial plus methadone maintenance treatment versus methadone maintenance treatment alone for opioid use disorder in improving treatment retention and reducing drug use.

Methods: An exhaustive literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL, China National Knowledge Infrastructure database, "the Wan Fang database, the VIP database, and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database", and randomized controlled trials were identified from their inception to February 2021.

Results: Twenty-four studies were included. The results of this meta-analysis showed that adding any psychosocial treatment to standard methadone maintenance treatment significantly improved the illicit drug use during the treatment relative risk (RR) 0.62 (95% CI 0.48 to 0.79), and retention in treatment RR 1.18 (95% CI 1.11 to 1.25). No statistically significant additional benefit was detected in terms of retention at follow-up RR 1.08 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.22).

Conclusions: The present evidence suggests that adding psychosocial intervention to methadone maintenance treatment significantly improves the nonuse of opioids and retention in treatment. It should be noted that psychosocial treatment is only beneficial for methadone treatment when methadone is provided in subtherapeutic doses. Additionally, the finding about the improvement effect of retention at follow-up did not achieve statistical significance. Due to the diversity of outcome indicators in relevant original studies, the included studies are limited.

在治疗阿片类药物使用障碍方面,社会心理疗法与美沙酮维持治疗相结合与单独使用美沙酮维持治疗相比:荟萃分析。
背景:针对阿片类药物使用障碍的社会心理治疗与美沙酮维持治疗相结合是有效的,但社会心理干预在此类治疗中的疗效值得怀疑:针对阿片类药物使用障碍的社会心理治疗与美沙酮维持治疗相结合是有效的,但社会心理干预在这种治疗中的效果值得怀疑:本研究旨在评估社会心理干预加美沙酮维持治疗与单纯美沙酮维持治疗在改善阿片类药物使用障碍的治疗维持率和减少药物使用方面的效果:在PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、PsycINFO、CINAHL、中国国家知识基础设施数据库、"万方数据库、VIP数据库和中国生物医学文献数据库 "中进行了详尽的文献检索,并确定了从开始到2021年2月的随机对照试验:结果:共纳入 24 项研究。荟萃分析结果显示,在标准美沙酮维持治疗的基础上增加任何社会心理治疗,都能显著改善治疗期间非法药物使用的相对风险(RR)为0.62(95% CI 0.48~0.79),改善治疗保留率(RR)为1.18(95% CI 1.11~1.25)。在随访保留率 RR 1.08(95% CI 0.95 至 1.22)方面,未发现有统计学意义的额外益处:目前的证据表明,在美沙酮维持治疗中加入社会心理干预能显著改善阿片类药物的不使用和治疗的持续性。需要注意的是,社会心理治疗只有在美沙酮剂量低于治疗剂量时才对美沙酮治疗有益。此外,关于随访保留率改善效果的研究结果在统计学上并不显著。由于相关原始研究的结果指标多种多样,因此纳入的研究是有限的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Journal of Addictive Diseases is an essential, comprehensive resource covering the full range of addictions for today"s addiction professional. This in-depth, practical journal helps you stay on top of the vital issues and the clinical skills necessary to ensure effective practice. The latest research, treatments, and public policy issues in addiction medicine are presented in a fully integrated, multi-specialty perspective. Top researchers and respected leaders in addiction issues share their knowledge and insights to keep you up-to-date on the most important research and practical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信