Parent ratings on the MEMRY questionnaire predict children's academic performance.

IF 1.6 3区 心理学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Marsha Vasserman, Shane Virani, William S MacAllister, Naddley Désiré, Sandra Mish, Taryn Fay-McClymont, L Collins Medlin, Brian L Brooks
{"title":"Parent ratings on the MEMRY questionnaire predict children's academic performance.","authors":"Marsha Vasserman,&nbsp;Shane Virani,&nbsp;William S MacAllister,&nbsp;Naddley Désiré,&nbsp;Sandra Mish,&nbsp;Taryn Fay-McClymont,&nbsp;L Collins Medlin,&nbsp;Brian L Brooks","doi":"10.1080/09297049.2022.2071420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Given the high rates of learning challenges in children with medical conditions, efficient and reliable screening methods are crucial. This study examined whether parent report of daily learning and memory predicts academic achievement in youth. Parents of 213 youth (aged 6-18) with varied medical diagnoses completed the Multidimensional Everyday Memory Ratings for Youth (MEMRY), and youth completed subtests from the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-Third Edition (WIAT-III) as part of a comprehensive assessment. All scales of the MEMRY (Learning, Daily Memory, Executive/Working Memory) correlated significantly with WIAT-III Spelling, Word Reading, and Numerical Operations, while only the MEMRY Learning subscale correlated significantly with WIAT-III Pseudoword Decoding. Regression analyses indicated that MEMRY Learning significantly predicted WIAT-III Word Reading and Spelling, while both the MEMRY Learning and MEMRY Daily Memory scales significantly predicted WIAT-III Numerical Operations. When Full Scale IQ was entered into the models first, the MEMRY Learning subscale accounted for an additional 4% of variance in WIAT-III Word Reading and 7% of variance in WIAT-III Spelling, but did not account for additional variance in WIAT-III Numerical Operations or Pseudoword Decoding. Analyses in a subset of children with broadly normal intellectual functioning demonstrated very similar results, with even higher variance in academic testing accounted for by the MEMRY. In sum, the MEMRY questionnaire may serve as an efficient screen to identify children at risk for reading, spelling, and math deficits.</p>","PeriodicalId":9789,"journal":{"name":"Child Neuropsychology","volume":"29 1","pages":"96-114"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2022.2071420","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Given the high rates of learning challenges in children with medical conditions, efficient and reliable screening methods are crucial. This study examined whether parent report of daily learning and memory predicts academic achievement in youth. Parents of 213 youth (aged 6-18) with varied medical diagnoses completed the Multidimensional Everyday Memory Ratings for Youth (MEMRY), and youth completed subtests from the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-Third Edition (WIAT-III) as part of a comprehensive assessment. All scales of the MEMRY (Learning, Daily Memory, Executive/Working Memory) correlated significantly with WIAT-III Spelling, Word Reading, and Numerical Operations, while only the MEMRY Learning subscale correlated significantly with WIAT-III Pseudoword Decoding. Regression analyses indicated that MEMRY Learning significantly predicted WIAT-III Word Reading and Spelling, while both the MEMRY Learning and MEMRY Daily Memory scales significantly predicted WIAT-III Numerical Operations. When Full Scale IQ was entered into the models first, the MEMRY Learning subscale accounted for an additional 4% of variance in WIAT-III Word Reading and 7% of variance in WIAT-III Spelling, but did not account for additional variance in WIAT-III Numerical Operations or Pseudoword Decoding. Analyses in a subset of children with broadly normal intellectual functioning demonstrated very similar results, with even higher variance in academic testing accounted for by the MEMRY. In sum, the MEMRY questionnaire may serve as an efficient screen to identify children at risk for reading, spelling, and math deficits.

父母在记忆问卷上的评分可以预测孩子的学习成绩。
鉴于患有疾病的儿童学习困难的比率很高,有效和可靠的筛查方法至关重要。本研究考察了父母的日常学习和记忆报告是否能预测青少年的学业成绩。213名患有不同医学诊断的青少年(6-18岁)的父母完成了青少年多维日常记忆评分(记忆),青少年完成了韦氏个人成就测试第三版(WIAT-III)的子测试,作为综合评估的一部分。记忆的所有量表(学习、日常记忆、执行/工作记忆)与WIAT-III拼写、单词阅读和数字运算显著相关,而只有记忆学习子量表与WIAT-III伪词解码显著相关。回归分析表明,记忆学习显著预测WIAT-III单词阅读和拼写,而记忆学习和记忆日常记忆量表均显著预测WIAT-III数值运算。当全量表智商首先进入模型时,记忆学习子量表在WIAT-III单词阅读和WIAT-III拼写中占4%的方差和7%的方差,但在WIAT-III数值运算或伪词解码中没有占到额外的方差。对一组智力功能大体正常的儿童进行的分析显示了非常相似的结果,在记忆力的学术测试中,差异甚至更大。总之,记忆问卷可以作为一种有效的筛选方法来识别有阅读、拼写和数学缺陷风险的儿童。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Child Neuropsychology
Child Neuropsychology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The purposes of Child Neuropsychology are to: publish research on the neuropsychological effects of disorders which affect brain functioning in children and adolescents, publish research on the neuropsychological dimensions of development in childhood and adolescence and promote the integration of theory, method and research findings in child/developmental neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of Child Neuropsychology is to publish original empirical research. Theoretical and methodological papers and theoretically relevant case studies are welcome. Critical reviews of topics pertinent to child/developmental neuropsychology are encouraged. Emphases of interest include the following: information processing mechanisms; the impact of injury or disease on neuropsychological functioning; behavioral cognitive and pharmacological approaches to treatment/intervention; psychosocial correlates of neuropsychological dysfunction; definitive normative, reliability, and validity studies of psychometric and other procedures used in the neuropsychological assessment of children and adolescents. Articles on both normal and dysfunctional development that are relevant to the aforementioned dimensions are welcome. Multiple approaches (e.g., basic, applied, clinical) and multiple methodologies (e.g., cross-sectional, longitudinal, experimental, multivariate, correlational) are appropriate. Books, media, and software reviews will be published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信