Structure-function models for estimating retinal ganglion cell count using steady-state pattern electroretinography and optical coherence tomography in glaucoma suspects and preperimetric glaucoma: an electrophysiological pilot study.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Derek Orshan, Andrew Tirsi, Hosam Sheha, Vasiliki Gliagias, Joby Tsai, Sung Chul Park, Stephen A Obstbaum, Celso Tello
{"title":"Structure-function models for estimating retinal ganglion cell count using steady-state pattern electroretinography and optical coherence tomography in glaucoma suspects and preperimetric glaucoma: an electrophysiological pilot study.","authors":"Derek Orshan,&nbsp;Andrew Tirsi,&nbsp;Hosam Sheha,&nbsp;Vasiliki Gliagias,&nbsp;Joby Tsai,&nbsp;Sung Chul Park,&nbsp;Stephen A Obstbaum,&nbsp;Celso Tello","doi":"10.1007/s10633-022-09900-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To derive and validate structure-function models for estimating retinal ganglion cell (RGC) count using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and steady-state pattern electroretinography (ssPERG) parameters in glaucoma suspects (GS) and preperimetric glaucoma (PPG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective cross-sectional study, 25 subjects (50 eyes) were recruited at the Manhattan Eye, Ear, and Throat Hospital. Subjects underwent comprehensive eye examinations, OCT, standard automated perimetry (SAP), and ssPERG testing. Eyes were divided into three groups based on the Global Glaucoma Staging System: healthy (N = 30), GS (N = 10), and PPG (N = 10) eyes. The combined structure-function index (CSFI), which estimates retinal ganglion cell count (eRGC<sub>CSFI</sub>) from SAP and OCT parameters, was calculated in each study subject. Two prediction formulas were derived using a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) to predict eRGC<sub>CSFI</sub> from ssPERG parameters, age, and average retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (ARNFLT) in 30 eyes selected at random (training group). GLMM predicted values were cross-validated with the remaining 20 eyes (validation group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ARNFLT, ssPERG parameters magnitude (Mag) and magnitudeD (MagD), and eRGC<sub>CSFI</sub> were significantly different among study groups (ANOVA p ≤ 0.001). Pearson correlations demonstrated significant associations among ARNFLT, ssPERG parameters, and eRGC<sub>CSFI</sub> (r<sup>2</sup> ≥ 0.31, p < 0.001). Two GLMMs predicted eRGC<sub>CSFI</sub> from Mag (eRGC<sub>Mag</sub>) and MagD (eRGC<sub>MagD</sub>), respectively, with significant equations (F(3,18), F(3,19) ≥  58.37, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.90, p < 0.001). eRGC<sub>Mag</sub> and eRGC<sub>MagD</sub> in the validation group (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.89) correlated with eRGC<sub>CSFI</sub> similarly to the training group. Multivariate pairwise comparisons revealed that eRGC<sub>Mag</sub> and eRGC<sub>MagD</sub> distinguished between healthy, GS, and PPG eyes (p ≤ 0.035), whereas independent Mag, MagD, and ARNFLT measures did not distinguish between GS and PPG eyes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pilot study offers the first combined structure-function models for estimating RGC count using ssPERG parameters. RGC counts estimated with these models were generalizable, strongly associated with CSFI estimates, and performed better than individual ssPERG and OCT measures in distinguishing healthy, GS, and PPG eyes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11207,"journal":{"name":"Documenta Ophthalmologica","volume":"145 3","pages":"221-235"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9653319/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Documenta Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-022-09900-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: To derive and validate structure-function models for estimating retinal ganglion cell (RGC) count using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and steady-state pattern electroretinography (ssPERG) parameters in glaucoma suspects (GS) and preperimetric glaucoma (PPG).

Methods: In this prospective cross-sectional study, 25 subjects (50 eyes) were recruited at the Manhattan Eye, Ear, and Throat Hospital. Subjects underwent comprehensive eye examinations, OCT, standard automated perimetry (SAP), and ssPERG testing. Eyes were divided into three groups based on the Global Glaucoma Staging System: healthy (N = 30), GS (N = 10), and PPG (N = 10) eyes. The combined structure-function index (CSFI), which estimates retinal ganglion cell count (eRGCCSFI) from SAP and OCT parameters, was calculated in each study subject. Two prediction formulas were derived using a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) to predict eRGCCSFI from ssPERG parameters, age, and average retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (ARNFLT) in 30 eyes selected at random (training group). GLMM predicted values were cross-validated with the remaining 20 eyes (validation group).

Results: The ARNFLT, ssPERG parameters magnitude (Mag) and magnitudeD (MagD), and eRGCCSFI were significantly different among study groups (ANOVA p ≤ 0.001). Pearson correlations demonstrated significant associations among ARNFLT, ssPERG parameters, and eRGCCSFI (r2 ≥ 0.31, p < 0.001). Two GLMMs predicted eRGCCSFI from Mag (eRGCMag) and MagD (eRGCMagD), respectively, with significant equations (F(3,18), F(3,19) ≥  58.37, R2 = 0.90, p < 0.001). eRGCMag and eRGCMagD in the validation group (R2 = 0.89) correlated with eRGCCSFI similarly to the training group. Multivariate pairwise comparisons revealed that eRGCMag and eRGCMagD distinguished between healthy, GS, and PPG eyes (p ≤ 0.035), whereas independent Mag, MagD, and ARNFLT measures did not distinguish between GS and PPG eyes.

Conclusion: This pilot study offers the first combined structure-function models for estimating RGC count using ssPERG parameters. RGC counts estimated with these models were generalizable, strongly associated with CSFI estimates, and performed better than individual ssPERG and OCT measures in distinguishing healthy, GS, and PPG eyes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用稳态模式视网膜电成像和光学相干断层扫描估计青光眼和准周青光眼视网膜神经节细胞计数的结构-功能模型:一项电生理学先导研究。
目的:建立并验证利用光学相干断层扫描(OCT)和稳态模式视网膜电图(ssPERG)参数估计疑似青光眼(GS)和准周性青光眼(PPG)视网膜神经节细胞(RGC)计数的结构-功能模型。方法:在这项前瞻性横断面研究中,在曼哈顿眼耳喉医院招募了25名受试者(50只眼睛)。受试者进行了全面的眼部检查、OCT、标准自动视距(SAP)和ssPERG测试。根据全球青光眼分期系统将眼分为健康眼(N = 30)、GS眼(N = 10)和PPG眼(N = 10)三组。根据SAP和OCT参数估计视网膜神经节细胞计数(eRGCCSFI)的组合结构-功能指数(CSFI)在每个研究对象中计算。采用广义线性混合模型(GLMM)从随机选择的30只眼(训练组)的ssPERG参数、年龄和平均视网膜神经纤维层厚度(ARNFLT)推导出两个预测公式来预测eRGCCSFI。剩余20只眼(验证组)对GLMM预测值进行交叉验证。结果:各研究组间ARNFLT、ssPERG参数magnitude (Mag)和magnited (MagD)、eRGCCSFI差异有统计学意义(方差分析p≤0.001)。Pearson相关性显示,ARNFLT、ssPERG参数与eRGCCSFI之间存在显著相关性(r2≥0.31,p CSFI分别来自Mag (eRGCMag)和MagD (eRGCMagD),其中显著方程(F(3,18)、F(3,19)≥58.37,r2 = 0.90,验证组的p Mag和eRGCMagD与eRGCCSFI的相关性与训练组相似(r2 = 0.89)。多变量两两比较显示,eRGCMag和eRGCMagD可以区分健康眼、GS眼和PPG眼(p≤0.035),而独立的Mag、MagD和ARNFLT测量不能区分GS眼和PPG眼。结论:本初步研究提供了第一个使用ssPERG参数估计RGC计数的结构-功能组合模型。用这些模型估计的RGC计数是可推广的,与CSFI估计密切相关,并且在区分健康、GS和PPG眼睛方面比单独的ssPERG和OCT测量表现更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Documenta Ophthalmologica
Documenta Ophthalmologica 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
21.40%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Documenta Ophthalmologica is an official publication of the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision. The purpose of the journal is to promote the understanding and application of clinical electrophysiology of vision. Documenta Ophthalmologica will publish reviews, research articles, technical notes, brief reports and case studies which inform the readers about basic and clinical sciences related to visual electrodiagnosis and means to improve diagnosis and clinical management of patients using visual electrophysiology. Studies may involve animals or humans. In either case appropriate care must be taken to follow the Declaration of Helsinki for human subject or appropriate humane standards of animal care (e.g., the ARVO standards on Animal Care and Use).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信