Assessment of Medical Education on Transgender Health: A Scoping Literature Review.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Evaluation & the Health Professions Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-15 DOI:10.1177/01632787231214531
Samuel Dubin, Eric Kutscher, Ian Nolan, Nathan Levitt, Tiffany E Cook, Richard E Greene
{"title":"Assessment of Medical Education on Transgender Health: A Scoping Literature Review.","authors":"Samuel Dubin, Eric Kutscher, Ian Nolan, Nathan Levitt, Tiffany E Cook, Richard E Greene","doi":"10.1177/01632787231214531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Little is known about how physician learners are assessed following educational interventions about providing gender-affirming care to transgender and gender diverse (TGD) people. The inclusion of learner assessments with educational interventions is essential to understand and measure health professionals' knowledge and skills. We seek to describe how the medical literature has approached the assessment of learners following educational interventions about TGD health. A scoping literature review was done. The guiding research question was \"What are the current learner-assessment practices in medical education pedagogy about TGD health?\" A total of 270 manuscripts were reviewed. 17 manuscripts were included for data extraction. Miller's pyramid was used to categorize results. 15 used pre- and post-intervention knowledge questionaries to assess learners. Six used simulated patient encounters to assess learners. Most assessments of TGD knowledge and skills among physician learners are pre- and post-surveys. There is sparse literature on higher level assessment following educational interventions that demonstrate learner skills, behaviors, or impact on patient outcomes. Discrete, one-time interventions that are lecture or workshop-based have yet to rigorously assess learners' ability to provide clinical care to TGD patients that is both culturally humble and clinically astute.</p>","PeriodicalId":12315,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01632787231214531","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Little is known about how physician learners are assessed following educational interventions about providing gender-affirming care to transgender and gender diverse (TGD) people. The inclusion of learner assessments with educational interventions is essential to understand and measure health professionals' knowledge and skills. We seek to describe how the medical literature has approached the assessment of learners following educational interventions about TGD health. A scoping literature review was done. The guiding research question was "What are the current learner-assessment practices in medical education pedagogy about TGD health?" A total of 270 manuscripts were reviewed. 17 manuscripts were included for data extraction. Miller's pyramid was used to categorize results. 15 used pre- and post-intervention knowledge questionaries to assess learners. Six used simulated patient encounters to assess learners. Most assessments of TGD knowledge and skills among physician learners are pre- and post-surveys. There is sparse literature on higher level assessment following educational interventions that demonstrate learner skills, behaviors, or impact on patient outcomes. Discrete, one-time interventions that are lecture or workshop-based have yet to rigorously assess learners' ability to provide clinical care to TGD patients that is both culturally humble and clinically astute.

跨性别健康医学教育评估:范围文献综述。
很少有人知道如何评估医师学习者在教育干预提供性别肯定护理变性和性别多样化(TGD)的人。将学习者评估纳入教育干预措施对于了解和衡量卫生专业人员的知识和技能至关重要。我们试图描述如何医学文献已经接近学习者的评估教育干预后的TGD健康。进行了范围界定文献综述。指导研究的问题是“目前医学教育教学中关于TGD健康的学习者评估实践是什么?”审稿共270份。纳入17篇稿件进行数据提取。米勒金字塔被用来对结果进行分类。15使用干预前和干预后的知识问卷来评估学习者。其中六人使用模拟病人接触来评估学习者。医生学习者对TGD知识和技能的大多数评估是在调查前和调查后进行的。在教育干预后的高水平评估中,很少有文献表明学习者的技能、行为或对患者预后的影响。以讲座或研讨会为基础的离散的、一次性的干预措施尚未严格评估学习者为TGD患者提供临床护理的能力,这种能力既要在文化上谦虚,又要在临床上精明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Evaluation & the Health Professions is a peer-reviewed, quarterly journal that provides health-related professionals with state-of-the-art methodological, measurement, and statistical tools for conceptualizing the etiology of health promotion and problems, and developing, implementing, and evaluating health programs, teaching and training services, and products that pertain to a myriad of health dimensions. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 31 days
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信