Coaching during a crisis: Organizational coaches' praxis adaptation during the initial stages of the Covid-19 pandemic

IF 4 3区 管理学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
Nicky H. D. Terblanche
{"title":"Coaching during a crisis: Organizational coaches' praxis adaptation during the initial stages of the Covid-19 pandemic","authors":"Nicky H. D. Terblanche","doi":"10.1002/hrdq.21490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The chaotic initial stages of the Covid-19 pandemic severely challenged organizations. Economies shut down and millions of people were confined to their homes. Human resource practitioners turned to organizational coaching, a trusted human resource development intervention for help, however, to remain relevant during the crisis coaches had to adapt their praxis. The working alliance describes the mutual bond, goal, and task alignment between coach and client and is an indication of coaching efficacy. This study investigates to what extent organizational coaches' praxis adaptation at the start of the pandemic maintained a working alliance that still served the human resource development (HRD) paradigms of learning, performance, and meaningful work. Interviews with 26 organizational coaches from USA, UK, Australia, and South Africa recorded during the first general lockdown (April 2020) were inductively analyzed using thematic analysis and deductively interpreted through the working alliance theory and desired HRD outcome paradigms. Findings reveal seven organizational coaching praxis adaptations judged to support all three working alliance components, with “task” and “goal” more prominent than “bond,” suggesting a pragmatist preference reminiscent of crisis management. Praxis adaptation also seems to promote all three HRD paradigms of learning, performance, and meaningful work on individual and/or organizational levels. This study strengthens the already well-established link between HRD and coaching by positing that coaching is a dynamic, pragmatic, self-adaptive intervention that supports HRD during a crisis. Understanding coaches' praxis adaptation during the volatile initial stages of a crisis is important for HRD theory and practice given HRDs increasing reliance on coaching.</p>","PeriodicalId":47803,"journal":{"name":"Human Resource Development Quarterly","volume":"34 3","pages":"309-328"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9877817/pdf/HRDQ-9999-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Resource Development Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hrdq.21490","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The chaotic initial stages of the Covid-19 pandemic severely challenged organizations. Economies shut down and millions of people were confined to their homes. Human resource practitioners turned to organizational coaching, a trusted human resource development intervention for help, however, to remain relevant during the crisis coaches had to adapt their praxis. The working alliance describes the mutual bond, goal, and task alignment between coach and client and is an indication of coaching efficacy. This study investigates to what extent organizational coaches' praxis adaptation at the start of the pandemic maintained a working alliance that still served the human resource development (HRD) paradigms of learning, performance, and meaningful work. Interviews with 26 organizational coaches from USA, UK, Australia, and South Africa recorded during the first general lockdown (April 2020) were inductively analyzed using thematic analysis and deductively interpreted through the working alliance theory and desired HRD outcome paradigms. Findings reveal seven organizational coaching praxis adaptations judged to support all three working alliance components, with “task” and “goal” more prominent than “bond,” suggesting a pragmatist preference reminiscent of crisis management. Praxis adaptation also seems to promote all three HRD paradigms of learning, performance, and meaningful work on individual and/or organizational levels. This study strengthens the already well-established link between HRD and coaching by positing that coaching is a dynamic, pragmatic, self-adaptive intervention that supports HRD during a crisis. Understanding coaches' praxis adaptation during the volatile initial stages of a crisis is important for HRD theory and practice given HRDs increasing reliance on coaching.

危机期间的指导:组织教练在Covid-19大流行初始阶段的实践适应
Covid-19大流行初期的混乱给各组织带来了严重挑战。经济关闭,数百万人被限制在家中。人力资源从业者转向组织指导,这是一种值得信赖的人力资源开发干预措施,然而,为了在危机期间保持相关性,教练必须调整他们的实践。工作联盟描述了教练和客户之间的相互联系、目标和任务一致性,是教练有效性的一个指标。本研究调查了在大流行开始时,组织教练的实践适应在多大程度上维持了一种工作联盟,这种联盟仍然服务于人力资源开发(HRD)的学习、绩效和有意义的工作范式。在第一次全面封锁(2020年4月)期间,对来自美国、英国、澳大利亚和南非的26名组织教练的访谈记录进行了主题分析归纳分析,并通过工作联盟理论和期望HRD结果范式进行了演绎解释。研究结果显示,七种组织教练实践适应被认为支持所有三个工作联盟组成部分,“任务”和“目标”比“纽带”更突出,这表明实用主义者的偏好让人想起危机管理。实践适应似乎也在个人和/或组织层面上促进了所有三种人力资源开发范式:学习、绩效和有意义的工作。本研究通过假设指导是一种动态的、务实的、自适应的干预措施,在危机期间支持人力资源开发,从而加强了人力资源开发与指导之间已经确立的联系。鉴于人力资源开发人员越来越依赖教练,了解教练在危机初期波动阶段的实践适应对人力资源开发理论和实践都很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Human Resource Development Quarterly (HRDQ) is the first scholarly journal focused directly on the evolving field of human resource development (HRD). It provides a central focus for research on human resource development issues as well as the means for disseminating such research. HRDQ recognizes the interdisciplinary nature of the HRD field and brings together relevant research from the related fields, such as economics, education, management, sociology, and psychology. It provides an important link in the application of theory and research to HRD practice. HRDQ publishes scholarly work that addresses the theoretical foundations of HRD, HRD research, and evaluation of HRD interventions and contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信