Psychological distress and convergence of own and proxy health-related quality of life in carers of adults with an intellectual disability

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
S. Rudra, A. Ali, J. M. Powell, R. P. Hastings, V. Totsika
{"title":"Psychological distress and convergence of own and proxy health-related quality of life in carers of adults with an intellectual disability","authors":"S. Rudra,&nbsp;A. Ali,&nbsp;J. M. Powell,&nbsp;R. P. Hastings,&nbsp;V. Totsika","doi":"10.1111/jir.13088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>In adults with an intellectual disability, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is often measured by proxy report. This cross-sectional study investigated whether the mental health of proxy raters impacts the way they rate HRQoL.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this study, 110 carers of adults with an intellectual disability completed measures of psychological distress (Kessler-6) and HRQoL (EQ-5D-3L) about their own HRQoL and that of the care recipient. Differences between HRQoL scores as rated by the carer about themselves and the care recipient were calculated (convergence scores) and multiple regression models were fitted to estimate the association between proxy psychological distress and convergence scores for subjective/objective HRQoL controlling for support needs of the care recipient, carer age and gender of care recipient.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There was a significant association between psychological distress and subjective HRQoL convergence scores (<i>r</i> = .92; <i>P</i> = 0.03; 95%; CI: −1.76 to −0.09). There was no association between psychological distress and objective HRQoL convergence scores (<i>r</i> = .01; CI −0.02 to 0.001; <i>P</i> = 0.08). The association between psychological distress and HRQoL scores was no longer present when models did not include convergence scores.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Carers experiencing more psychological distress tended to rate their own and the care recipients' subjective HRQoL more similarly. Objective HRQoL measures did not show this convergence in scores with increasing carer psychological distress. Findings differed when the analysis approach was changed, suggesting the results above require replication in future studies.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16163,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jir.13088","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In adults with an intellectual disability, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is often measured by proxy report. This cross-sectional study investigated whether the mental health of proxy raters impacts the way they rate HRQoL.

Methods

In this study, 110 carers of adults with an intellectual disability completed measures of psychological distress (Kessler-6) and HRQoL (EQ-5D-3L) about their own HRQoL and that of the care recipient. Differences between HRQoL scores as rated by the carer about themselves and the care recipient were calculated (convergence scores) and multiple regression models were fitted to estimate the association between proxy psychological distress and convergence scores for subjective/objective HRQoL controlling for support needs of the care recipient, carer age and gender of care recipient.

Results

There was a significant association between psychological distress and subjective HRQoL convergence scores (r = .92; P = 0.03; 95%; CI: −1.76 to −0.09). There was no association between psychological distress and objective HRQoL convergence scores (r = .01; CI −0.02 to 0.001; P = 0.08). The association between psychological distress and HRQoL scores was no longer present when models did not include convergence scores.

Conclusions

Carers experiencing more psychological distress tended to rate their own and the care recipients' subjective HRQoL more similarly. Objective HRQoL measures did not show this convergence in scores with increasing carer psychological distress. Findings differed when the analysis approach was changed, suggesting the results above require replication in future studies.

智力残疾成人照护者自身和代理健康相关生活质量的心理困扰和趋同。
背景:在智力残疾成人中,健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)通常采用代理报告测量。本横断面研究调查了代理评分者的心理健康是否会影响他们对HRQoL的评分方式。方法:对110名成人智力障碍护理者进行心理困扰量表(Kessler-6)和HRQoL量表(EQ-5D-3L),对其自身和被护理者的HRQoL进行测评。计算照顾者对自己和被照顾者HRQoL评分的差异(收敛得分),并拟合多元回归模型来估计代理心理困扰与被照顾者支持需求、照顾者年龄和被照顾者性别控制的主观/客观HRQoL的收敛得分之间的关联。结果:心理困扰与主观HRQoL收敛评分有显著相关性(r = 0.92;p = 0.03;95%;CI: -1.76至-0.09)。心理困扰与客观HRQoL收敛评分无相关性(r = 0.01;CI -0.02 ~ 0.001;p = 0.08)。当模型不包括收敛分数时,心理困扰和HRQoL评分之间的关联不再存在。结论:经历较多心理困扰的照顾者倾向于评价自己和被照顾者的主观HRQoL。目的:HRQoL测量并未显示随着护理者心理困扰的增加而出现这种收敛性。当分析方法改变时,结果不同,表明上述结果需要在未来的研究中重复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The Journal of Intellectual Disability Research is devoted exclusively to the scientific study of intellectual disability and publishes papers reporting original observations in this field. The subject matter is broad and includes, but is not restricted to, findings from biological, educational, genetic, medical, psychiatric, psychological and sociological studies, and ethical, philosophical, and legal contributions that increase knowledge on the treatment and prevention of intellectual disability and of associated impairments and disabilities, and/or inform public policy and practice. Expert reviews on themes in which recent research has produced notable advances will be included. Such reviews will normally be by invitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信