On-demand EEG education through competition – A novel, app-based approach to learning to identify interictal epileptiform discharges

IF 2 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Jaden D. Barfuss , Fábio A. Nascimento , Erik Duhaime , Srishti Kapur , Ioannis Karakis , Marcus Ng , Aline Herlopian , Alice Lam , Douglas Maus , Jonathan J. Halford , Sydney Cash , M. Brandon Westover , Jin Jing
{"title":"On-demand EEG education through competition – A novel, app-based approach to learning to identify interictal epileptiform discharges","authors":"Jaden D. Barfuss ,&nbsp;Fábio A. Nascimento ,&nbsp;Erik Duhaime ,&nbsp;Srishti Kapur ,&nbsp;Ioannis Karakis ,&nbsp;Marcus Ng ,&nbsp;Aline Herlopian ,&nbsp;Alice Lam ,&nbsp;Douglas Maus ,&nbsp;Jonathan J. Halford ,&nbsp;Sydney Cash ,&nbsp;M. Brandon Westover ,&nbsp;Jin Jing","doi":"10.1016/j.cnp.2023.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Misinterpretation of EEGs harms patients, yet few resources exist to help trainees practice interpreting EEGs. We therefore sought to evaluate a novel educational tool to teach trainees how to identify interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) on EEG.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We created a public EEG test within the iOS app DiagnosUs using a pool of 13,262 candidate IEDs. Users were shown a candidate IED on EEG and asked to rate it as epileptiform (IED) or not (non-IED). They were given immediate feedback based on a gold standard. Learning was analyzed using a parametric model. We additionally analyzed IED features that best correlated with expert ratings.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Our analysis included 901 participants. Users achieved a mean improvement of 13% over 1,000 questions and an ending accuracy of 81%. Users and experts appeared to rely on a similar set of IED morphologic features when analyzing candidate IEDs. We additionally identified particular types of candidate EEGs that remained challenging for most users even after substantial practice.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Users improved in their ability to properly classify candidate IEDs through repeated exposure and immediate feedback.</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>This app-based learning activity has great potential to be an effective supplemental tool to teach neurology trainees how to accurately identify IEDs on EEG.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45697,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology Practice","volume":"8 ","pages":"Pages 177-186"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10480673/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurophysiology Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467981X23000240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Misinterpretation of EEGs harms patients, yet few resources exist to help trainees practice interpreting EEGs. We therefore sought to evaluate a novel educational tool to teach trainees how to identify interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) on EEG.

Methods

We created a public EEG test within the iOS app DiagnosUs using a pool of 13,262 candidate IEDs. Users were shown a candidate IED on EEG and asked to rate it as epileptiform (IED) or not (non-IED). They were given immediate feedback based on a gold standard. Learning was analyzed using a parametric model. We additionally analyzed IED features that best correlated with expert ratings.

Results

Our analysis included 901 participants. Users achieved a mean improvement of 13% over 1,000 questions and an ending accuracy of 81%. Users and experts appeared to rely on a similar set of IED morphologic features when analyzing candidate IEDs. We additionally identified particular types of candidate EEGs that remained challenging for most users even after substantial practice.

Conclusions

Users improved in their ability to properly classify candidate IEDs through repeated exposure and immediate feedback.

Significance

This app-based learning activity has great potential to be an effective supplemental tool to teach neurology trainees how to accurately identify IEDs on EEG.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

通过竞争按需脑电图教育-一种新颖的,基于应用程序的方法来学习识别间歇癫痫样放电
对脑电图的错误解读会伤害患者,但几乎没有资源可以帮助受训者练习解读脑电图。因此,我们试图评估一种新的教育工具,教受训者如何在脑电图上识别发作间期癫痫样放电(IED)。方法我们在iOS应用程序DiagnosUs中创建了一个公共脑电图测试,使用13262个候选IED。用户在脑电图上看到一个候选IED,并被要求将其评为癫痫样(IED)或非(非IED)。他们得到了基于金标准的即时反馈。使用参数模型对学习进行分析。我们还分析了与专家评级最相关的IED特征。结果我们的分析包括901名参与者。用户在1000多个问题中的平均改进率为13%,结束准确率为81%。用户和专家在分析候选简易爆炸装置时,似乎依赖于一组相似的简易爆炸装置形态特征。我们还确定了特定类型的候选脑电图,即使经过大量实践,这些脑电图对大多数用户来说仍然具有挑战性。结论用户通过反复接触和即时反馈,提高了对候选IED进行正确分类的能力。值得注意的是,这种基于应用程序的学习活动有很大的潜力成为一种有效的补充工具,教神经病学学员如何准确识别EEG上的IED。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Neurophysiology Practice (CNP) is a new Open Access journal that focuses on clinical practice issues in clinical neurophysiology including relevant new research, case reports or clinical series, normal values and didactic reviews. It is an official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology and complements Clinical Neurophysiology which focuses on innovative research in the specialty. It has a role in supporting established clinical practice, and an educational role for trainees, technicians and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信