Motor unit properties do not correlate between MUNIX and needle EMG in remote polio in the biceps brachii muscle

IF 2 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
A. Sandberg
{"title":"Motor unit properties do not correlate between MUNIX and needle EMG in remote polio in the biceps brachii muscle","authors":"A. Sandberg","doi":"10.1016/j.cnp.2022.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To compare the utility of MUNIX (motor unit number index) with needle EMG in characterizing motor unit (MU) properties in the biceps brachii (BB) muscle in subjects with remote polio.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Thirty subjects suffering from remote polio were investigated with MUNIX and needle EMG, all with Macro EMG and 16 of these subjects with concentric needle EMG.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Both MUNIX and the needle EMG methods showed abnormal results. Fiber density (FD) was the most sensitive parameter for showing signs of reinnervation. At a group level, the methods showed neurogenic findings, but there was no correlation between the results of the MUNIX and needle EMG investigations.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Both MUNIX and needle EMG are valuable methods for measuring neurogenic involvement in the BB muscle. However, there was a lack of correlation between the MUNIX and needle EMG findings. The cause for this missing correlation may be multifactorial as there are several differences between the methods.</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>The reason for the lack of correlation between the MUNIX and needle EMG results is discussed. By combining the needle and surface recorded methods one can obtain more information on the denervation and reinnervation process compared to using just one of the methods alone.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45697,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology Practice","volume":"8 ","pages":"Pages 24-31"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9826944/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurophysiology Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467981X2200049X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective

To compare the utility of MUNIX (motor unit number index) with needle EMG in characterizing motor unit (MU) properties in the biceps brachii (BB) muscle in subjects with remote polio.

Methods

Thirty subjects suffering from remote polio were investigated with MUNIX and needle EMG, all with Macro EMG and 16 of these subjects with concentric needle EMG.

Results

Both MUNIX and the needle EMG methods showed abnormal results. Fiber density (FD) was the most sensitive parameter for showing signs of reinnervation. At a group level, the methods showed neurogenic findings, but there was no correlation between the results of the MUNIX and needle EMG investigations.

Conclusions

Both MUNIX and needle EMG are valuable methods for measuring neurogenic involvement in the BB muscle. However, there was a lack of correlation between the MUNIX and needle EMG findings. The cause for this missing correlation may be multifactorial as there are several differences between the methods.

Significance

The reason for the lack of correlation between the MUNIX and needle EMG results is discussed. By combining the needle and surface recorded methods one can obtain more information on the denervation and reinnervation process compared to using just one of the methods alone.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

运动单元特性与脊髓灰质炎在肱二头肌的脊髓灰质炎和针肌电图之间不相关
目的比较MUNIX(运动单位数指数)和针式肌电图在表征远端脊髓灰质炎患者肱二头肌(BB)运动单位(MU)特性方面的实用性。方法对30例小儿麻痹症患者进行MUNIX和针式肌电图检查,均采用宏观肌电图,其中16例采用同心针式肌电图。纤维密度(FD)是显示神经再支配迹象最敏感的参数。在组水平上,这些方法显示出神经源性发现,但MUNIX的结果和针肌电图研究之间没有相关性。结论MUNIX和针式肌电图是测量BB肌神经源性受累的有价值的方法。然而,MUNIX和针肌电图检查结果之间缺乏相关性。这种缺失相关性的原因可能是多因素的,因为两种方法之间存在一些差异。显著性讨论了MUNIX和针肌电图结果之间缺乏相关性的原因。与单独使用其中一种方法相比,通过结合针头和表面记录方法,可以获得更多关于去神经和再神经过程的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Neurophysiology Practice (CNP) is a new Open Access journal that focuses on clinical practice issues in clinical neurophysiology including relevant new research, case reports or clinical series, normal values and didactic reviews. It is an official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology and complements Clinical Neurophysiology which focuses on innovative research in the specialty. It has a role in supporting established clinical practice, and an educational role for trainees, technicians and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信