Brief report comparing the Scale of Emotional Development – Short (SED-S) with other scales for emotional development

IF 2.1 2区医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL

Journal of Intellectual Disability Research Pub Date : 2023-09-06 DOI:10.1111/jir.13081

T. Sappok, F. Morisse, M. Flachsmeyer, S. Vandevelde, M. Ilic, B. F. Barrett

{"title":"Brief report comparing the Scale of Emotional Development – Short (SED-S) with other scales for emotional development","authors":"T. Sappok, F. Morisse, M. Flachsmeyer, S. Vandevelde, M. Ilic, B. F. Barrett","doi":"10.1111/jir.13081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Different instruments were devised for assessing emotional development (ED) level in persons with an intellectual disability (ID), that is, the <i>Scale of Emotional Development – Short</i> (SED-S), the <i>Scheme for Appraisal of Emotional Development</i> (SAED), the <i>Scale for Emotional Development – Second Revision</i> (SED-R<sup>2</sup>) and the <i>Schaal voor Emotionele Ontwikkeling – Lukas</i> (SEO-Lukas). The aim of this study was to compare the level of emotional functioning as assessed with the SED-S with the SAED, SED-R<sup>2</sup> and SEO-Lukas.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Emotional development was measured in adults with ID with the SED-S (<i>N</i> = 186) and the SAED (<i>n</i> = 85), the SED-R<sup>2</sup> (<i>n</i> = 50) and the SEO-Lukas (<i>n</i> = 51). Correlation analysis and Cohen's kappas were calculated between the SED-S and the three respective scales. Internal consistencies (Cronbach's alpha) of the four scales were determined.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The SED-S results correlated most with the SEO-Lukas (γ = 1; кω = 0.936) followed by the SAED (γ = 0.809; кω = 0.343) and least by the SED-R<sup>2</sup> (γ = 0.665; кω = 0.182). The stage of ED assessed with the SED-S was lower than the ED results measured with the SAED, but higher than with the SED-R<sup>2</sup> and most similar to the SEO-Lukas. Cronbach's alphas were high, ranging from 0.853 to 0.975.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Given the respective differences between the scales, the SED-S may equalise the results as compared with previous versions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16163,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jir.13081","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jir.13081","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Different instruments were devised for assessing emotional development (ED) level in persons with an intellectual disability (ID), that is, the Scale of Emotional Development – Short (SED-S), the Scheme for Appraisal of Emotional Development (SAED), the Scale for Emotional Development – Second Revision (SED-R²) and the Schaal voor Emotionele Ontwikkeling – Lukas (SEO-Lukas). The aim of this study was to compare the level of emotional functioning as assessed with the SED-S with the SAED, SED-R² and SEO-Lukas.

Methods

Emotional development was measured in adults with ID with the SED-S (N = 186) and the SAED (n = 85), the SED-R² (n = 50) and the SEO-Lukas (n = 51). Correlation analysis and Cohen's kappas were calculated between the SED-S and the three respective scales. Internal consistencies (Cronbach's alpha) of the four scales were determined.

Results

The SED-S results correlated most with the SEO-Lukas (γ = 1; кω = 0.936) followed by the SAED (γ = 0.809; кω = 0.343) and least by the SED-R² (γ = 0.665; кω = 0.182). The stage of ED assessed with the SED-S was lower than the ED results measured with the SAED, but higher than with the SED-R² and most similar to the SEO-Lukas. Cronbach's alphas were high, ranging from 0.853 to 0.975.

Conclusions

Given the respective differences between the scales, the SED-S may equalise the results as compared with previous versions.

查看原文本刊更多论文

简要报告将情绪发展量表（SED-S）与其他情感发展量表进行比较。

背景：设计了不同的工具来评估智力残疾（ID）患者的情绪发展（ED）水平，即情绪发展量表-短期（SED-S）、情绪发展评估计划（SAED）、情绪发育量表-第二次修订（SED-R2）和Schaal voor Emotioele Ontwikeling-Lukas（SEO Lukas）。本研究的目的是比较SED-S与SAED、SED-R2和SEO-Lukas评估的情绪功能水平。方法：测量ID为SED-S（N=186）和SAED（N=85）的成年人的情绪发展，SED-R2（N=50）和SEO Lukas（N=51）。计算SED-s和三个相应量表之间的相关性分析和Cohen’s kappas。测定了四个量表的内部一致性（克朗巴赫α）。结果：SED-S结果与SEO Lukas相关性最大（γ=1；κω=0.936），其次是SAED（γ=0.809；κω0.343），与SED-R2相关性最小（γ=0.665；κΩ=0.182）。SED-S评估的ED分期低于SAED测量的ED结果，但高于SED-R2，与SEO Lucas最相似。Cronbach的α很高，范围从0.853到0.975。结论：考虑到量表之间的差异，SED-s可能与以前的版本相比使结果持平。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Intellectual Disability Research Multiple-

CiteScore

5.60

自引率

5.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Intellectual Disability Research is devoted exclusively to the scientific study of intellectual disability and publishes papers reporting original observations in this field. The subject matter is broad and includes, but is not restricted to, findings from biological, educational, genetic, medical, psychiatric, psychological and sociological studies, and ethical, philosophical, and legal contributions that increase knowledge on the treatment and prevention of intellectual disability and of associated impairments and disabilities, and/or inform public policy and practice. Expert reviews on themes in which recent research has produced notable advances will be included. Such reviews will normally be by invitation.