How reliable is assessment of children's sentence comprehension using a self-directed app? A comparison of supported versus independent use.

IF 1.7 2区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Journal of Child Language Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-14 DOI:10.1017/S0305000923000545
Pauline Frizelle, Ana Buckley, Tricia Biancone, Anna Ceroni, Darren Dahly, Paul Fletcher, Dorothy V M Bishop, Cristina McKean
{"title":"How reliable is assessment of children's sentence comprehension using a self-directed app? A comparison of supported versus independent use.","authors":"Pauline Frizelle, Ana Buckley, Tricia Biancone, Anna Ceroni, Darren Dahly, Paul Fletcher, Dorothy V M Bishop, Cristina McKean","doi":"10.1017/S0305000923000545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study reports on the feasibility of using the Test of Complex Syntax- Electronic (TECS-E), as a self-directed app, to measure sentence comprehension in children aged 4 to 5 ½ years old; how testing apps might be adapted for effective independent use; and agreement levels between face-to-face supported computerized and independent computerized testing with this cohort. A pilot phase was completed with 4 to 4;06-year-old children, to determine the appropriate functional app features required to facilitate independent test completion. Following the integration of identified features, children completed the app independently or with adult support (4-4;05 (n = 22) 4;06-4;11 months (n = 55) and 5 to 5;05 (<i>n</i> = 113)) and test re-test reliability was examined. Independent test completion posed problems for children under 5 years but for those over 5, TECS-E is a reliable method to assess children's understanding of complex sentences, when used independently.</p>","PeriodicalId":48132,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Language","volume":" ","pages":"1395-1423"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child Language","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000923000545","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study reports on the feasibility of using the Test of Complex Syntax- Electronic (TECS-E), as a self-directed app, to measure sentence comprehension in children aged 4 to 5 ½ years old; how testing apps might be adapted for effective independent use; and agreement levels between face-to-face supported computerized and independent computerized testing with this cohort. A pilot phase was completed with 4 to 4;06-year-old children, to determine the appropriate functional app features required to facilitate independent test completion. Following the integration of identified features, children completed the app independently or with adult support (4-4;05 (n = 22) 4;06-4;11 months (n = 55) and 5 to 5;05 (n = 113)) and test re-test reliability was examined. Independent test completion posed problems for children under 5 years but for those over 5, TECS-E is a reliable method to assess children's understanding of complex sentences, when used independently.

使用自我导向应用程序评估儿童的句子理解能力有多可靠?支持使用与独立使用的比较。
本研究报告了使用复杂句法测试-电子(tec - e)作为自我导向应用程序来测量4 - 5岁半儿童句子理解的可行性;测试应用如何适应有效的独立使用;在这个队列中,面对面支持的计算机化测试和独立计算机化测试之间的一致性水平。一个试点阶段是在4到46岁的儿童中完成的,以确定促进独立测试完成所需的适当功能应用程序特性。在整合识别的特征后,儿童独立完成应用程序或在成人支持下完成应用程序(4-4;05 (n = 22) 4;06-4;11个月(n = 55)和5至5;05 (n = 113)),并对测试重测信度进行检验。对于5岁以下的儿童来说,独立完成测试存在问题,但对于5岁以上的儿童来说,独立使用tec - e是评估儿童对复杂句理解的可靠方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
142
期刊介绍: A key publication in the field, Journal of Child Language publishes articles on all aspects of the scientific study of language behaviour in children, the principles which underlie it, and the theories which may account for it. The international range of authors and breadth of coverage allow the journal to forge links between many different areas of research including psychology, linguistics, cognitive science and anthropology. This interdisciplinary approach spans a wide range of interests: phonology, phonetics, morphology, syntax, vocabulary, semantics, pragmatics, sociolinguistics, or any other recognised facet of language study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信