Subgenual Anterior Cingulate Cortex Reactivity to Rejection Vs. Acceptance Predicts Depressive Symptoms among Adolescents with an Anxiety History.

IF 4.2 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Jennifer S Silk, Stefanie S Sequeira, Neil P Jones, Kyung Hwa Lee, Ronald E Dahl, Erika E Forbes, Neal D Ryan, Cecile D Ladouceur
{"title":"Subgenual Anterior Cingulate Cortex Reactivity to Rejection Vs. Acceptance Predicts Depressive Symptoms among Adolescents with an Anxiety History.","authors":"Jennifer S Silk, Stefanie S Sequeira, Neil P Jones, Kyung Hwa Lee, Ronald E Dahl, Erika E Forbes, Neal D Ryan, Cecile D Ladouceur","doi":"10.1080/15374416.2021.2019048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The goal of this study was to examine whether neural sensitivity to negative peer evaluation conveys risk for depression among youth with a history of anxiety. We hypothesized that brain activation in regions that process affective salience in response to rejection, relative to acceptance, from virtual peers would predict depressive symptoms 1 year later and would be associated with ecological momentary assessment (EMA) reports of peer connectedness.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants were 38 adolescents ages 11-16 (50% female) with a history of anxiety, recruited from a previous clinical trial. The study was a prospective naturalistic follow-up of depressive symptoms assessed 2 years (Wave 2) and 3 years (Wave 3) following treatment. At Wave 2, participants completed the Chatroom Interact Task during neuroimaging and 16 days of EMA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Controlling for depressive and anxiety symptoms at Wave 2, subgenual anterior cingulate (sgACC; <i>β </i>= .39, <i>p</i> = .010) activation to peer rejection (vs. acceptance) predicted depressive symptoms at Wave 3. SgACC activation to rejection (vs. acceptance) was highly negatively correlated with EMA reports of connectedness with peers in daily life (<i>r</i> = - .71, <i>p</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings suggest that elevated sgACC activation to negative, relative to positive, peer evaluation may serve as a risk factor for depressive symptoms among youth with a history of anxiety, perhaps by promoting vigilance or reactivity to social evaluative threats. SgACC activation to simulated peer evaluation appears to have implications for understanding how adolescents experience their daily social environments in ways that could contribute to depressive symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":48350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology","volume":"52 5","pages":"659-674"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9308833/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2021.2019048","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The goal of this study was to examine whether neural sensitivity to negative peer evaluation conveys risk for depression among youth with a history of anxiety. We hypothesized that brain activation in regions that process affective salience in response to rejection, relative to acceptance, from virtual peers would predict depressive symptoms 1 year later and would be associated with ecological momentary assessment (EMA) reports of peer connectedness.

Method: Participants were 38 adolescents ages 11-16 (50% female) with a history of anxiety, recruited from a previous clinical trial. The study was a prospective naturalistic follow-up of depressive symptoms assessed 2 years (Wave 2) and 3 years (Wave 3) following treatment. At Wave 2, participants completed the Chatroom Interact Task during neuroimaging and 16 days of EMA.

Results: Controlling for depressive and anxiety symptoms at Wave 2, subgenual anterior cingulate (sgACC; β = .39, p = .010) activation to peer rejection (vs. acceptance) predicted depressive symptoms at Wave 3. SgACC activation to rejection (vs. acceptance) was highly negatively correlated with EMA reports of connectedness with peers in daily life (r = - .71, p < .001).

Conclusion: Findings suggest that elevated sgACC activation to negative, relative to positive, peer evaluation may serve as a risk factor for depressive symptoms among youth with a history of anxiety, perhaps by promoting vigilance or reactivity to social evaluative threats. SgACC activation to simulated peer evaluation appears to have implications for understanding how adolescents experience their daily social environments in ways that could contribute to depressive symptoms.

前扣带回皮层下源对拒绝与接受的反应可预测有焦虑史的青少年的抑郁症状。
研究目的本研究旨在探讨神经系统对同伴负面评价的敏感性是否会影响有焦虑史的青少年患抑郁症的风险。我们假设,相对于接受虚拟同伴的拒绝,处理情感显著性的大脑区域的激活将预测一年后的抑郁症状,并与生态瞬间评估(EMA)报告的同伴联系相关:参与者为 38 名有焦虑病史的 11-16 岁青少年(50% 为女性),他们是从之前的一项临床试验中招募的。该研究是一项前瞻性自然追踪研究,对抑郁症状进行了治疗后两年(第二波)和三年(第三波)的评估。在第二阶段,参与者在神经影像学检查和16天的EMA期间完成了聊天室互动任务:控制第 2 波时的抑郁症状和焦虑症状后,第 3 波时,前扣带回下源(sgACC;β = .39,p = .010)对同伴拒绝(与接受)的激活可预测抑郁症状。SgACC对拒绝(与接受)的激活与EMA报告的日常生活中与同伴的联系呈高度负相关(r = - .71,p 结论:SgACC对拒绝(与接受)的激活与EMA报告的日常生活中与同伴的联系呈高度负相关:研究结果表明,相对于积极的同伴评价,消极同伴评价的 SgACC 激活程度升高可能会成为有焦虑史的青少年出现抑郁症状的风险因素,这可能是通过提高对社会评价威胁的警惕性或反应性造成的。SgACC对模拟同伴评价的激活似乎对了解青少年如何体验他们的日常社会环境,从而导致抑郁症状具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology (JCCAP) is the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association. It publishes original contributions on the following topics: (a) the development and evaluation of assessment and intervention techniques for use with clinical child and adolescent populations; (b) the development and maintenance of clinical child and adolescent problems; (c) cross-cultural and sociodemographic issues that have a clear bearing on clinical child and adolescent psychology in terms of theory, research, or practice; and (d) training and professional practice in clinical child and adolescent psychology, as well as child advocacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信