Structural Correlates of Mental Health Support Access among Sexual Minority Youth of Color during COVID-19.

IF 4.2 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Chantelle Roulston, Sarah McKetta, Maggi Price, Kathryn R Fox, Jessica L Schleider
{"title":"Structural Correlates of Mental Health Support Access among Sexual Minority Youth of Color during COVID-19.","authors":"Chantelle Roulston, Sarah McKetta, Maggi Price, Kathryn R Fox, Jessica L Schleider","doi":"10.1080/15374416.2022.2034633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many youth with mental health needs cannot access treatment, with multiply-marginalized youth, such as sexual minority youth of Color (SMYoC), experiencing both structural and identity-related barriers to care. The COVID-19 pandemic threatens to exacerbate multi-level treatment access barriers facing SMYoC youth nationwide. However, little large-scale research has examined access to mental health care among SMYoC across the United States, either during or prior to the pandemic. Such work is critical to understanding and ameliorating barriers in this domain. Using data from adolescents who self-identified as SMYoC and who endorsed a desire for mental health support during the COVID-19 pandemic (<i>N</i> = 470, ages 13-16, from 43 U.S. states), we examined associations between state-level, structural factors (income inequality; mental health-care provider shortage; anti-Black racism; homophobia; and the interaction between anti-Black racism and homophobia) and SMYoC mental health treatment access. Multinomial logistic regressions revealed state-level mental health-care provider shortage as the only significant predictor of SMYoC reporting they <i>never</i> (versus <i>always</i>) accessed mental health support during the COVID-19 pandemic. SMYoC living in areas with both lower homophobia <i>and</i> lower anti-Black racism were more likely to report <i>always</i> (versus <i>sometimes</i>) accessing mental health treatment. Results highlight the critical importance of considering diverse structural factors and applying an intersectional lens when exploring barriers to mental health treatment among multiply-marginalized youth. In locations where provider shortages are less severe, cultural stigma - including anti-Black racism and homophobia - may still pose challenges for SMYoC in need of mental health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology","volume":"52 5","pages":"649-658"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9452605/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2022.2034633","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many youth with mental health needs cannot access treatment, with multiply-marginalized youth, such as sexual minority youth of Color (SMYoC), experiencing both structural and identity-related barriers to care. The COVID-19 pandemic threatens to exacerbate multi-level treatment access barriers facing SMYoC youth nationwide. However, little large-scale research has examined access to mental health care among SMYoC across the United States, either during or prior to the pandemic. Such work is critical to understanding and ameliorating barriers in this domain. Using data from adolescents who self-identified as SMYoC and who endorsed a desire for mental health support during the COVID-19 pandemic (N = 470, ages 13-16, from 43 U.S. states), we examined associations between state-level, structural factors (income inequality; mental health-care provider shortage; anti-Black racism; homophobia; and the interaction between anti-Black racism and homophobia) and SMYoC mental health treatment access. Multinomial logistic regressions revealed state-level mental health-care provider shortage as the only significant predictor of SMYoC reporting they never (versus always) accessed mental health support during the COVID-19 pandemic. SMYoC living in areas with both lower homophobia and lower anti-Black racism were more likely to report always (versus sometimes) accessing mental health treatment. Results highlight the critical importance of considering diverse structural factors and applying an intersectional lens when exploring barriers to mental health treatment among multiply-marginalized youth. In locations where provider shortages are less severe, cultural stigma - including anti-Black racism and homophobia - may still pose challenges for SMYoC in need of mental health care.

COVID-19 期间有色人种性少数群体青年获得心理健康支持的结构性相关因素。
许多有心理健康需求的青年无法获得治疗,而多重边缘化的青年,如有色人种中的性少数群体青年(SMYoC),在接受治疗时会遇到结构性障碍和与身份相关的障碍。COVID-19 的流行有可能加剧全国范围内有色人种青年所面临的多层次治疗障碍。然而,无论是在大流行期间还是之前,很少有大规模的研究对全美中小男性和女性青少年获得心理健康护理的情况进行调查。这项工作对于了解和改善这一领域的障碍至关重要。利用自我认同为 SMYoC 并在 COVID-19 大流行期间表示希望获得心理健康支持的青少年的数据(N = 470,13-16 岁,来自美国 43 个州),我们研究了州一级的结构性因素(收入不平等;心理健康保健提供者短缺;反黑人种族主义;仇视同性恋;以及反黑人种族主义和仇视同性恋之间的交互作用)与 SMYoC 心理健康治疗机会之间的关联。多项式逻辑回归显示,州一级的心理健康医疗服务提供者短缺是唯一能显著预测 SMYoC 在 COVID-19 大流行期间报告从未(相对于总是)获得心理健康支持的因素。生活在仇视同性恋现象较少和反黑人种族主义现象较少地区的 SMYoC 更有可能报告他们总是(而不是有时)获得心理健康治疗。研究结果突出表明,在探讨多重边缘化青少年接受心理健康治疗的障碍时,考虑各种结构性因素并运用交叉视角至关重要。在医疗服务提供者短缺不那么严重的地方,文化污名--包括反黑人种族主义和仇视同性恋--可能仍然会给需要心理健康护理的 SMYoC 带来挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology (JCCAP) is the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association. It publishes original contributions on the following topics: (a) the development and evaluation of assessment and intervention techniques for use with clinical child and adolescent populations; (b) the development and maintenance of clinical child and adolescent problems; (c) cross-cultural and sociodemographic issues that have a clear bearing on clinical child and adolescent psychology in terms of theory, research, or practice; and (d) training and professional practice in clinical child and adolescent psychology, as well as child advocacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信