Systematic Review of Procedural Skill Simulation in Health Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Franziska Pollok, Sarah B Lund, Michael D Traynor, Roberto Alva-Ruiz, Taleen A MacArthur, Ryan D Watkins, Cillian R Mahony, Malin Woerster, Vicky J-H Yeh, Alphonsus Matovu, Damian L Clarke, Torrey A Laack, Mariela Rivera
{"title":"Systematic Review of Procedural Skill Simulation in Health Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.","authors":"Franziska Pollok, Sarah B Lund, Michael D Traynor, Roberto Alva-Ruiz, Taleen A MacArthur, Ryan D Watkins, Cillian R Mahony, Malin Woerster, Vicky J-H Yeh, Alphonsus Matovu, Damian L Clarke, Torrey A Laack, Mariela Rivera","doi":"10.1097/SIH.0000000000000737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary statement: </strong>Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have adopted procedural skill simulation, with researchers increasingly investigating simulation efforts in resource-strained settings. We aim to summarize the current state of procedural skill simulation research in LMICs focusing on methodology, clinical area, types of outcomes and cost, cost-effectiveness, and overall sustainability. We performed a comprehensive literature review of original articles that assessed procedural skill simulation from database inception until April 2022.From 5371 screened articles, 262 were included in this review. All included studies were in English. Most studies were observational cohort studies (72.9%) and focused on obstetrics and neonatal medicine (32.4%). Most measured outcome was the process of task performance (56.5%). Several studies mentioned cost (38.9%) or sustainability (29.8%). However, few articles included actual monetary cost information (11.1%); only 1 article assessed cost-effectiveness. Based on our review, future research of procedural skill simulation in LMICS should focus on more rigorous research, cost assessments, and on less studied areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":49517,"journal":{"name":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000737","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary statement: Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have adopted procedural skill simulation, with researchers increasingly investigating simulation efforts in resource-strained settings. We aim to summarize the current state of procedural skill simulation research in LMICs focusing on methodology, clinical area, types of outcomes and cost, cost-effectiveness, and overall sustainability. We performed a comprehensive literature review of original articles that assessed procedural skill simulation from database inception until April 2022.From 5371 screened articles, 262 were included in this review. All included studies were in English. Most studies were observational cohort studies (72.9%) and focused on obstetrics and neonatal medicine (32.4%). Most measured outcome was the process of task performance (56.5%). Several studies mentioned cost (38.9%) or sustainability (29.8%). However, few articles included actual monetary cost information (11.1%); only 1 article assessed cost-effectiveness. Based on our review, future research of procedural skill simulation in LMICS should focus on more rigorous research, cost assessments, and on less studied areas.

中低收入国家医疗保健程序技能模拟的系统回顾。
摘要说明:中低收入国家(LMICs)已经采用了程序技能模拟,研究人员越来越多地调查资源紧张环境下的模拟工作。我们旨在总结中低收入国家程序技能模拟研究的现状,重点关注方法、临床领域、结果类型和成本、成本效益以及整体可持续性。我们对从数据库建立到 2022 年 4 月期间评估程序技能模拟的原创文章进行了全面的文献综述。所有纳入的研究均为英文。大多数研究为观察性队列研究(72.9%),侧重于产科和新生儿科(32.4%)。大多数测量结果是任务执行过程(56.5%)。一些研究提到了成本(38.9%)或可持续性(29.8%)。然而,很少有文章包含实际货币成本信息(11.1%);只有一篇文章评估了成本效益。根据我们的综述,未来对低密度多器官功能综合征中程序性技能模拟的研究应侧重于更严格的研究、成本评估以及研究较少的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare is a multidisciplinary publication encompassing all areas of applications and research in healthcare simulation technology. The journal is relevant to a broad range of clinical and biomedical specialties, and publishes original basic, clinical, and translational research on these topics and more: Safety and quality-oriented training programs; Development of educational and competency assessment standards; Reports of experience in the use of simulation technology; Virtual reality; Epidemiologic modeling; Molecular, pharmacologic, and disease modeling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信