Planning engagement with web resources to improve diet quality and break up sedentary time for home-working employees: A mixed methods study.

IF 5.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Dawn Holford, Gianluca Tognon, Valerie Gladwell, Kelly Murray, Mark Nicoll, Angela Knox, Rachel McCloy, Vanessa Loaiza
{"title":"Planning engagement with web resources to improve diet quality and break up sedentary time for home-working employees: A mixed methods study.","authors":"Dawn Holford, Gianluca Tognon, Valerie Gladwell, Kelly Murray, Mark Nicoll, Angela Knox, Rachel McCloy, Vanessa Loaiza","doi":"10.1037/ocp0000356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As home working becomes more common, employers may struggle to provide health promotion interventions that can successfully bridge the gap between employees' intentions to engage in healthier behaviors and actual action. Based on past evidence that action planning can successfully encourage the adoption of healthier behaviors, this mixed-methods study of a web-based self-help intervention incorporated a randomized planning trial that included quantitative measures of engagement and follow-up qualitative interviews with a subsample of participants. Participants either (a) selected a movement plan for incorporating a series of 2-min exercise videos into their work week to break up sedentary time and a balanced meal plan with recipe cards for a week's lunches and dinners or (b) received access to these resources without a plan. Selecting a movement plan was more effective at increasing engagement with the web resources compared to the no-plan condition. In the follow-up interviews, participants indicated that the plan helped to remind participants to engage with the resources and made it simpler for them to follow the guidance for exercises and meals. Ease of use and being able to fit exercises and meals around work tasks were key factors that facilitated uptake of the resources, while lack of time and worries about how colleagues would perceive them taking breaks to use the resources were barriers to uptake. Participants' self-efficacy was associated with general resource use but not plan adherence. Overall, including plans with online self-help resources could enhance their uptake. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Health Psychology","volume":"28 4","pages":"224-238"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10424491/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000356","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As home working becomes more common, employers may struggle to provide health promotion interventions that can successfully bridge the gap between employees' intentions to engage in healthier behaviors and actual action. Based on past evidence that action planning can successfully encourage the adoption of healthier behaviors, this mixed-methods study of a web-based self-help intervention incorporated a randomized planning trial that included quantitative measures of engagement and follow-up qualitative interviews with a subsample of participants. Participants either (a) selected a movement plan for incorporating a series of 2-min exercise videos into their work week to break up sedentary time and a balanced meal plan with recipe cards for a week's lunches and dinners or (b) received access to these resources without a plan. Selecting a movement plan was more effective at increasing engagement with the web resources compared to the no-plan condition. In the follow-up interviews, participants indicated that the plan helped to remind participants to engage with the resources and made it simpler for them to follow the guidance for exercises and meals. Ease of use and being able to fit exercises and meals around work tasks were key factors that facilitated uptake of the resources, while lack of time and worries about how colleagues would perceive them taking breaks to use the resources were barriers to uptake. Participants' self-efficacy was associated with general resource use but not plan adherence. Overall, including plans with online self-help resources could enhance their uptake. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

计划利用网络资源提高饮食质量,减少在家工作员工的久坐时间:混合方法研究。
随着在家工作变得越来越普遍,雇主可能很难提供能够成功弥合员工参与健康行为的意愿与实际行动之间差距的健康促进干预措施。过去有证据表明,行动规划可以成功地鼓励人们采取更健康的行为,基于这一证据,本研究对基于网络的自助干预措施进行了混合方法研究,其中包括一项随机规划试验,该试验包括对参与度的定量测量以及对参与者子样本的后续定性访谈。参与者要么(a)选择一个运动计划,将一系列 2 分钟的运动视频融入一周的工作中,以打散久坐的时间;要么(b)选择一个平衡膳食计划,包括一周午餐和晚餐的食谱卡;要么(b)在没有计划的情况下获得这些资源。与没有计划的情况相比,选择运动计划能更有效地提高网络资源的参与度。在后续访谈中,参与者表示,计划有助于提醒参与者使用资源,并使他们更容易按照指导进行锻炼和进餐。易于使用以及能够在工作任务之余进行锻炼和进餐是促进使用资源的关键因素,而没有时间和担心同事会认为他们在休息时间使用资源则是使用资源的障碍。参与者的自我效能与一般资源的使用有关,但与计划的坚持无关。总的来说,在计划中加入在线自助资源可以提高计划的使用率。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Journal of Occupational Health Psychology offers research, theory, and public policy articles in occupational health psychology, an interdisciplinary field representing a broad range of backgrounds, interests, and specializations. Occupational health psychology concerns the application of psychology to improving the quality of work life and to protecting and promoting the safety, health, and well-being of workers. This journal focuses on the work environment, the individual, and the work-family interface.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信