A systematic review of social network sentiment analysis with comparative study of ensemble-based techniques

IF 10.7 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Dimple Tiwari, Bharti Nagpal, Bhoopesh Singh Bhati, Ashutosh Mishra, Manoj Kumar
{"title":"A systematic review of social network sentiment analysis with comparative study of ensemble-based techniques","authors":"Dimple Tiwari,&nbsp;Bharti Nagpal,&nbsp;Bhoopesh Singh Bhati,&nbsp;Ashutosh Mishra,&nbsp;Manoj Kumar","doi":"10.1007/s10462-023-10472-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sentiment Analysis (SA) of text reviews is an emerging concern in Natural Language Processing (NLP). It is a broadly active method for analyzing and extracting opinions from text using individual or ensemble learning techniques. This field has unquestionable potential in the digital world and social media platforms. Therefore, we present a systematic survey that organizes and describes the current scenario of the SA and provides a structured overview of proposed approaches from traditional to advance. This work also discusses the SA-related challenges, feature engineering techniques, benchmark datasets, popular publication platforms, and best algorithms to advance the automatic SA. Furthermore, a comparative study has been conducted to assess the performance of bagging and boosting-based ensemble techniques for social network SA. Bagging and Boosting are two major approaches of ensemble learning that contain various ensemble algorithms to classify sentiment polarity. Recent studies recommend that ensemble learning techniques have the potential of applicability for sentiment classification. This analytical study examines the bagging and boosting-based ensemble techniques on four benchmark datasets to provide extensive knowledge regarding ensemble techniques for SA. The efficiency and accuracy of these techniques have been measured in terms of TPR, FPR, Weighted F-Score, Weighted Precision, Weighted Recall, Accuracy, ROC-AUC curve, and Run-Time. Moreover, comparative results reveal that bagging-based ensemble techniques outperformed boosting-based techniques for text classification. This extensive review aims to present benchmark information regarding social network SA that will be helpful for future research in this field.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8449,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence Review","volume":"56 11","pages":"13407 - 13461"},"PeriodicalIF":10.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-023-10472-w.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence Review","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-023-10472-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Sentiment Analysis (SA) of text reviews is an emerging concern in Natural Language Processing (NLP). It is a broadly active method for analyzing and extracting opinions from text using individual or ensemble learning techniques. This field has unquestionable potential in the digital world and social media platforms. Therefore, we present a systematic survey that organizes and describes the current scenario of the SA and provides a structured overview of proposed approaches from traditional to advance. This work also discusses the SA-related challenges, feature engineering techniques, benchmark datasets, popular publication platforms, and best algorithms to advance the automatic SA. Furthermore, a comparative study has been conducted to assess the performance of bagging and boosting-based ensemble techniques for social network SA. Bagging and Boosting are two major approaches of ensemble learning that contain various ensemble algorithms to classify sentiment polarity. Recent studies recommend that ensemble learning techniques have the potential of applicability for sentiment classification. This analytical study examines the bagging and boosting-based ensemble techniques on four benchmark datasets to provide extensive knowledge regarding ensemble techniques for SA. The efficiency and accuracy of these techniques have been measured in terms of TPR, FPR, Weighted F-Score, Weighted Precision, Weighted Recall, Accuracy, ROC-AUC curve, and Run-Time. Moreover, comparative results reveal that bagging-based ensemble techniques outperformed boosting-based techniques for text classification. This extensive review aims to present benchmark information regarding social network SA that will be helpful for future research in this field.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

社交网络情感分析与基于集成技术的比较研究的系统综述。
文本评论的情感分析(SA)是自然语言处理(NLP)中一个新兴的问题。它是一种广泛活跃的方法,用于使用个人或集体学习技术从文本中分析和提取意见。这一领域在数字世界和社交媒体平台上具有毋庸置疑的潜力。因此,我们提出了一项系统的调查,该调查组织和描述了SA的当前场景,并对从传统到先进的拟议方法进行了结构化概述。本文还讨论了SA相关的挑战、特征工程技术、基准数据集、流行的发布平台以及推进自动SA的最佳算法。此外,还进行了比较研究,以评估基于bagging和boosting的集成技术在社交网络SA中的性能。Bagging和Boosting是集成学习的两种主要方法,包含了各种用于对情绪极性进行分类的集成算法。最近的研究表明,集成学习技术具有适用于情绪分类的潜力。这项分析研究在四个基准数据集上检查了基于装袋和助推的集成技术,以提供有关SA集成技术的广泛知识。这些技术的效率和准确性已根据TPR、FPR、加权F-Score、加权精度、加权召回率、准确度、ROC-AUC曲线和运行时间进行了测量。此外,比较结果表明,基于bagging的集成技术在文本分类方面优于基于boosting的技术。这篇广泛的综述旨在提供有关社交网络SA的基准信息,这将有助于该领域的未来研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence Review
Artificial Intelligence Review 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence Review, a fully open access journal, publishes cutting-edge research in artificial intelligence and cognitive science. It features critical evaluations of applications, techniques, and algorithms, providing a platform for both researchers and application developers. The journal includes refereed survey and tutorial articles, along with reviews and commentary on significant developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信