在同一新型数字线性加速器平台上,将一种新的基于圆锥的放射外科系统与经过临床测试的放射手术系统进行比较。

IF 0.7 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Journal of Medical Physics Pub Date : 2023-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-29 DOI:10.4103/jmp.jmp_93_22
Dayananda Shamurailatpam Sharma, P Shaju, Mayur B Sawant, Suryakant Kaushik
{"title":"在同一新型数字线性加速器平台上,将一种新的基于圆锥的放射外科系统与经过临床测试的放射手术系统进行比较。","authors":"Dayananda Shamurailatpam Sharma,&nbsp;P Shaju,&nbsp;Mayur B Sawant,&nbsp;Suryakant Kaushik","doi":"10.4103/jmp.jmp_93_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the dosimetric characteristics of circular cones, the accuracy of dose modeling and overall treatment delivery of two radiosurgery systems integrated on a linear accelerator (Linac).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The dosimetric characteristics of circular cones (4-17.5 mm) from Varian (VC) and BrainLAB (BLC) were measured for 6 MV flattening filter free beam from Edge linac using stereotactic field diode and 0.65 cc ionization chamber following established protocols. The Eclipse and iPlan modeled dose distribution for VCs and BLCs were validated with EBT3-film measurement. End-to-end tests were performed using stereotactic phantom having PTW 60008 diode connected to a Dose-1 electrometer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The depth at dose maximum, TRP<sup>20</sup><sub>10</sub> and dose at 10cm depth of the same size VC and BLC agree within ± 0.7 mm, ± 0.71% and ± 0.81% respectively. Full width at half maximum (FWHM) of any cone beyond 15 mm depth increases at 1% of nominal cone size per 10 mm depth. The penumbra of 4mm and 17.5mm VC at 15 mm depth was 1.1 mm and 1.50 mm. At 300 mm depth, penumbra increased by around 0.4 mm for 4 mm cone and up to 1 mm for cone size ≥12.5 mm. The VCs penumbra values were within ±1mm of the corresponding BLCs. Scatter factors for VCs varies from 0.609 to 0.841 and were within ± 1.0% of corresponding values of BLCs. Agreement between the Eclipse and iPlan computed dose fluence and the EBT3-film measured dose fluence was >98% (γ: 1%@1 mm), and the absolute dose difference was ≤ 2.2%, except for the 4 mm cone in which it was >96% and ≤4.83%. Target localization using cone-beam computed tomography was accurate within ± 0.8 mm and ± 0.3° in translation and rotation. The end-to-end dose delivery accuracy for both radiosurgery systems was within ± 3.62%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The dosimetric characteristics of Varian and BLC cones of same diameter was comparable. Both Eclipse and iPlan cone planning system modeled dose fluences agree well with the EBT3 film measurement. The end-to-end tests revealed an excellent target localization accuracy of Edge linac with satisfactory and comparable absolute dose agreement between Varian and BLC radiosurgery systems and hence these can be interchanged on edge linac.</p>","PeriodicalId":51719,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"48 2","pages":"111-119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2f/13/JMP-48-111.PMC10419751.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benchmarking a New Circular Cone-based Radiosurgery System against Clinically Tested Radiosurgery System on the same Novel Digital Linear Accelerator Platform.\",\"authors\":\"Dayananda Shamurailatpam Sharma,&nbsp;P Shaju,&nbsp;Mayur B Sawant,&nbsp;Suryakant Kaushik\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jmp.jmp_93_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the dosimetric characteristics of circular cones, the accuracy of dose modeling and overall treatment delivery of two radiosurgery systems integrated on a linear accelerator (Linac).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The dosimetric characteristics of circular cones (4-17.5 mm) from Varian (VC) and BrainLAB (BLC) were measured for 6 MV flattening filter free beam from Edge linac using stereotactic field diode and 0.65 cc ionization chamber following established protocols. The Eclipse and iPlan modeled dose distribution for VCs and BLCs were validated with EBT3-film measurement. End-to-end tests were performed using stereotactic phantom having PTW 60008 diode connected to a Dose-1 electrometer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The depth at dose maximum, TRP<sup>20</sup><sub>10</sub> and dose at 10cm depth of the same size VC and BLC agree within ± 0.7 mm, ± 0.71% and ± 0.81% respectively. Full width at half maximum (FWHM) of any cone beyond 15 mm depth increases at 1% of nominal cone size per 10 mm depth. The penumbra of 4mm and 17.5mm VC at 15 mm depth was 1.1 mm and 1.50 mm. At 300 mm depth, penumbra increased by around 0.4 mm for 4 mm cone and up to 1 mm for cone size ≥12.5 mm. The VCs penumbra values were within ±1mm of the corresponding BLCs. Scatter factors for VCs varies from 0.609 to 0.841 and were within ± 1.0% of corresponding values of BLCs. Agreement between the Eclipse and iPlan computed dose fluence and the EBT3-film measured dose fluence was >98% (γ: 1%@1 mm), and the absolute dose difference was ≤ 2.2%, except for the 4 mm cone in which it was >96% and ≤4.83%. Target localization using cone-beam computed tomography was accurate within ± 0.8 mm and ± 0.3° in translation and rotation. The end-to-end dose delivery accuracy for both radiosurgery systems was within ± 3.62%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The dosimetric characteristics of Varian and BLC cones of same diameter was comparable. Both Eclipse and iPlan cone planning system modeled dose fluences agree well with the EBT3 film measurement. The end-to-end tests revealed an excellent target localization accuracy of Edge linac with satisfactory and comparable absolute dose agreement between Varian and BLC radiosurgery systems and hence these can be interchanged on edge linac.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"48 2\",\"pages\":\"111-119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2f/13/JMP-48-111.PMC10419751.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_93_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_93_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:检查两个集成在线性加速器(Linac)上的放射外科系统的圆锥的剂量测量特性、剂量建模的准确性和整体治疗递送。材料和方法:使用立体定向场二极管和0.65cc电离室,按照既定方案,测量了来自Varian(VC)和BrainLAB(BLC)的圆形锥体(4-17.5mm)在来自Edge直线加速器的6MV平坦无滤波器光束下的剂量特性。Eclipse和iPlan模型化的VC和BLC的剂量分布通过EBT3膜测量进行了验证。使用立体定向体模进行端到端测试,该体模具有连接到Dose-1静电计的PTW 60008二极管。结果:相同大小VC和BLC的最大剂量深度、TRP2010和10cm深度的剂量分别在±0.7mm、±0.71%和±0.81%范围内。超过15 mm深度的任何锥体的最大半宽(FWHM),每10 mm深度增加标称锥体尺寸的1%。4mm和17.5mm VC在15mm深度处的半影分别为1.1mm和1.50mm。在300mm深度处,4mm锥体的半影增加了约0.4mm,锥体尺寸≥12.5mm时半影增加至1mm。VC的半影值在相应BLC的±1mm范围内。VC的散射因子在0.609到0.841之间变化,并且在BLC相应值的±1.0%范围内。Eclipse和iPlan计算的剂量通量与EBT3胶片测量的剂量通量之间的一致性>98%(γ:1%@1mm),绝对剂量差≤2.2%,但4mm圆锥体的一致性>96%且≤4.83%。使用锥形束计算机断层扫描的目标定位在平移和旋转方面的准确度在±0.8 mm和±0.3°以内。两种放射外科系统的端到端剂量递送准确率均在±3.62%以内。结论:相同直径的Varian锥和BLC锥的剂量测量特性具有可比性。Eclipse和iPlan锥形规划系统建模的剂量通量与EBT3胶片测量结果一致。端到端测试显示,边缘直线加速器具有良好的目标定位精度,Varian和BLC放射外科系统之间具有令人满意和可比较的绝对剂量一致性,因此这些系统可以在边缘直线加速器上互换。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Benchmarking a New Circular Cone-based Radiosurgery System against Clinically Tested Radiosurgery System on the same Novel Digital Linear Accelerator Platform.

Benchmarking a New Circular Cone-based Radiosurgery System against Clinically Tested Radiosurgery System on the same Novel Digital Linear Accelerator Platform.

Benchmarking a New Circular Cone-based Radiosurgery System against Clinically Tested Radiosurgery System on the same Novel Digital Linear Accelerator Platform.

Benchmarking a New Circular Cone-based Radiosurgery System against Clinically Tested Radiosurgery System on the same Novel Digital Linear Accelerator Platform.

Objective: To examine the dosimetric characteristics of circular cones, the accuracy of dose modeling and overall treatment delivery of two radiosurgery systems integrated on a linear accelerator (Linac).

Materials and methods: The dosimetric characteristics of circular cones (4-17.5 mm) from Varian (VC) and BrainLAB (BLC) were measured for 6 MV flattening filter free beam from Edge linac using stereotactic field diode and 0.65 cc ionization chamber following established protocols. The Eclipse and iPlan modeled dose distribution for VCs and BLCs were validated with EBT3-film measurement. End-to-end tests were performed using stereotactic phantom having PTW 60008 diode connected to a Dose-1 electrometer.

Results: The depth at dose maximum, TRP2010 and dose at 10cm depth of the same size VC and BLC agree within ± 0.7 mm, ± 0.71% and ± 0.81% respectively. Full width at half maximum (FWHM) of any cone beyond 15 mm depth increases at 1% of nominal cone size per 10 mm depth. The penumbra of 4mm and 17.5mm VC at 15 mm depth was 1.1 mm and 1.50 mm. At 300 mm depth, penumbra increased by around 0.4 mm for 4 mm cone and up to 1 mm for cone size ≥12.5 mm. The VCs penumbra values were within ±1mm of the corresponding BLCs. Scatter factors for VCs varies from 0.609 to 0.841 and were within ± 1.0% of corresponding values of BLCs. Agreement between the Eclipse and iPlan computed dose fluence and the EBT3-film measured dose fluence was >98% (γ: 1%@1 mm), and the absolute dose difference was ≤ 2.2%, except for the 4 mm cone in which it was >96% and ≤4.83%. Target localization using cone-beam computed tomography was accurate within ± 0.8 mm and ± 0.3° in translation and rotation. The end-to-end dose delivery accuracy for both radiosurgery systems was within ± 3.62%.

Conclusion: The dosimetric characteristics of Varian and BLC cones of same diameter was comparable. Both Eclipse and iPlan cone planning system modeled dose fluences agree well with the EBT3 film measurement. The end-to-end tests revealed an excellent target localization accuracy of Edge linac with satisfactory and comparable absolute dose agreement between Varian and BLC radiosurgery systems and hence these can be interchanged on edge linac.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Physics
Journal of Medical Physics RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
55
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS is the official journal of Association of Medical Physicists of India (AMPI). The association has been bringing out a quarterly publication since 1976. Till the end of 1993, it was known as Medical Physics Bulletin, which then became Journal of Medical Physics. The main objective of the Journal is to serve as a vehicle of communication to highlight all aspects of the practice of medical radiation physics. The areas covered include all aspects of the application of radiation physics to biological sciences, radiotherapy, radiodiagnosis, nuclear medicine, dosimetry and radiation protection. Papers / manuscripts dealing with the aspects of physics related to cancer therapy / radiobiology also fall within the scope of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信