高危新生儿经导管肺动脉分带:初步临床经验引发的体外研究。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Shannen B Kizilski, Dominic P Recco, Francesca Sperotto, Nora Lang, Peter E Hammer, Christopher W Baird, Nicola Maschietto, David M Hoganson
{"title":"高危新生儿经导管肺动脉分带:初步临床经验引发的体外研究。","authors":"Shannen B Kizilski,&nbsp;Dominic P Recco,&nbsp;Francesca Sperotto,&nbsp;Nora Lang,&nbsp;Peter E Hammer,&nbsp;Christopher W Baird,&nbsp;Nicola Maschietto,&nbsp;David M Hoganson","doi":"10.1007/s13239-023-00674-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Very high-risk, ductal-dependent or complex two-ventricle patients with associated comorbidities often require pulmonary blood flow restriction as bridge to a more definitive procedure, but current surgical options may not be well-tolerated. An evolving alternative utilizes a fenestrated Micro Vascular Plug (MVP) as a transcatheter, internal pulmonary artery band. In this study, we report a case series and an in-vitro evaluation of the MVP to elicit understanding of the challenges faced with device implantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following single-center, retrospective review of eight patients who underwent device placement, an in-vitro flow study was conducted on MVP devices to assess impact of device and fenestration sizing on pulmonary blood flow. A mathematical model was developed to relate migration risk to vessel size. Results of the engineering analysis were compared to the clinical series for validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At median follow-up of 8 months (range 1-15), survival was 63% (5/8), and 6 (75%) patients underwent subsequent target surgical intervention with relatively low mortality (1/6). Occluder-related challenges included migration (63%) and peri-device flow, which were evaluated in-vitro. The device demonstrated durability over normal and supraphysiologic conditions with minimal change in fenestration size. Smaller vessel size significantly increased pressure gradient due to reduced peri-device flow and smaller effective fenestration size.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Device oversizing, with appropriate adjustment to fenestration size, may reduce migration risk and provide a clinically appropriate balance between resulting pressure gradient and Qp:Qs. Our results can guide the interventionalist in appropriately selecting the device and fenestrations based on patient-specific anatomy and desired post-implantation flow characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":54322,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"640-654"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transcatheter Pulmonary Artery Banding in High-Risk Neonates: In-Vitro Study Provoked by Initial Clinical Experience.\",\"authors\":\"Shannen B Kizilski,&nbsp;Dominic P Recco,&nbsp;Francesca Sperotto,&nbsp;Nora Lang,&nbsp;Peter E Hammer,&nbsp;Christopher W Baird,&nbsp;Nicola Maschietto,&nbsp;David M Hoganson\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13239-023-00674-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Very high-risk, ductal-dependent or complex two-ventricle patients with associated comorbidities often require pulmonary blood flow restriction as bridge to a more definitive procedure, but current surgical options may not be well-tolerated. An evolving alternative utilizes a fenestrated Micro Vascular Plug (MVP) as a transcatheter, internal pulmonary artery band. In this study, we report a case series and an in-vitro evaluation of the MVP to elicit understanding of the challenges faced with device implantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following single-center, retrospective review of eight patients who underwent device placement, an in-vitro flow study was conducted on MVP devices to assess impact of device and fenestration sizing on pulmonary blood flow. A mathematical model was developed to relate migration risk to vessel size. Results of the engineering analysis were compared to the clinical series for validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At median follow-up of 8 months (range 1-15), survival was 63% (5/8), and 6 (75%) patients underwent subsequent target surgical intervention with relatively low mortality (1/6). Occluder-related challenges included migration (63%) and peri-device flow, which were evaluated in-vitro. The device demonstrated durability over normal and supraphysiologic conditions with minimal change in fenestration size. Smaller vessel size significantly increased pressure gradient due to reduced peri-device flow and smaller effective fenestration size.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Device oversizing, with appropriate adjustment to fenestration size, may reduce migration risk and provide a clinically appropriate balance between resulting pressure gradient and Qp:Qs. Our results can guide the interventionalist in appropriately selecting the device and fenestrations based on patient-specific anatomy and desired post-implantation flow characteristics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"640-654\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13239-023-00674-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13239-023-00674-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:具有相关合并症的高危、导管依赖性或复杂的双心室患者通常需要肺血流量限制作为更明确手术的桥梁,但目前的手术选择可能不能很好地耐受。一种不断发展的替代方案利用开窗微血管塞(MVP)作为经导管的内部肺动脉带。在这项研究中,我们报告了一系列病例和MVP的体外评估,以了解设备植入面临的挑战。方法:在对8例植入MVP装置的患者进行单中心回顾性审查后,对MVP装置进行体外血流研究,以评估装置和开窗尺寸对肺血流量的影响。开发了一个数学模型,将迁移风险与船只大小联系起来。将工程分析的结果与临床系列进行比较以进行验证。结果:在中位随访8个月(范围1-15)时,存活率为63%(5/8),6名(75%)患者随后接受了靶向手术干预,死亡率相对较低(1/6)。封堵器相关的挑战包括迁移(63%)和装置周围流动,这些都是在体外评估的。该装置在正常和超生理条件下表现出耐用性,开窗尺寸变化最小。由于装置周围流量减少和有效开窗尺寸减小,较小的血管尺寸显著增加了压力梯度。结论:器械尺寸过大,适当调整开窗大小,可以降低迁移风险,并在由此产生的压力梯度和Qp:Qs之间提供临床上合适的平衡。我们的研究结果可以指导干预者根据患者的具体解剖结构和所需的植入后流动特征适当选择装置和开窗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Transcatheter Pulmonary Artery Banding in High-Risk Neonates: In-Vitro Study Provoked by Initial Clinical Experience.

Transcatheter Pulmonary Artery Banding in High-Risk Neonates: In-Vitro Study Provoked by Initial Clinical Experience.

Purpose: Very high-risk, ductal-dependent or complex two-ventricle patients with associated comorbidities often require pulmonary blood flow restriction as bridge to a more definitive procedure, but current surgical options may not be well-tolerated. An evolving alternative utilizes a fenestrated Micro Vascular Plug (MVP) as a transcatheter, internal pulmonary artery band. In this study, we report a case series and an in-vitro evaluation of the MVP to elicit understanding of the challenges faced with device implantation.

Methods: Following single-center, retrospective review of eight patients who underwent device placement, an in-vitro flow study was conducted on MVP devices to assess impact of device and fenestration sizing on pulmonary blood flow. A mathematical model was developed to relate migration risk to vessel size. Results of the engineering analysis were compared to the clinical series for validation.

Results: At median follow-up of 8 months (range 1-15), survival was 63% (5/8), and 6 (75%) patients underwent subsequent target surgical intervention with relatively low mortality (1/6). Occluder-related challenges included migration (63%) and peri-device flow, which were evaluated in-vitro. The device demonstrated durability over normal and supraphysiologic conditions with minimal change in fenestration size. Smaller vessel size significantly increased pressure gradient due to reduced peri-device flow and smaller effective fenestration size.

Conclusion: Device oversizing, with appropriate adjustment to fenestration size, may reduce migration risk and provide a clinically appropriate balance between resulting pressure gradient and Qp:Qs. Our results can guide the interventionalist in appropriately selecting the device and fenestrations based on patient-specific anatomy and desired post-implantation flow characteristics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology
Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology is a journal publishing the spectrum of basic to translational research in all aspects of cardiovascular physiology and medical treatment. It is the forum for academic and industrial investigators to disseminate research that utilizes engineering principles and methods to advance fundamental knowledge and technological solutions related to the cardiovascular system. Manuscripts spanning from subcellular to systems level topics are invited, including but not limited to implantable medical devices, hemodynamics and tissue biomechanics, functional imaging, surgical devices, electrophysiology, tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, diagnostic instruments, transport and delivery of biologics, and sensors. In addition to manuscripts describing the original publication of research, manuscripts reviewing developments in these topics or their state-of-art are also invited.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信