丹麦20个月大的孩子对熟悉单词的识别,包括辅音和元音发音错误。

IF 1.1 3区 文学 Q3 ACOUSTICS
Phonetica Pub Date : 2023-08-03 Print Date: 2023-10-26 DOI:10.1515/phon-2023-2001
Anders Højen, Thomas O Madsen, Dorthe Bleses
{"title":"丹麦20个月大的孩子对熟悉单词的识别,包括辅音和元音发音错误。","authors":"Anders Højen,&nbsp;Thomas O Madsen,&nbsp;Dorthe Bleses","doi":"10.1515/phon-2023-2001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although several studies initially supported the proposal by Nespor et al. (Nespor, Marina, Marcela Peña & Jacques Mehler. 2003. On the different roles of vowels and consonants in speech processing and language acquisition. <i>Lingue e Linguaggio</i> 2. 221-247) that consonants are more informative than vowels in lexical processing, a more complex picture has emerged from recent research. Current evidence suggests that infants initially show a vowel bias in lexical processing and later transition to a consonant bias, possibly depending on the characteristics of the ambient language. Danish infants have shown a vowel bias in word learning at 20 months-an age at which infants learning French or Italian no longer show a vowel bias but rather a consonant bias, and infants learning English show no bias. The present study tested whether Danish 20-month-olds also have a vowel bias when recognizing <i>familiar</i> words. Specifically, using the Intermodal Preferential Looking paradigm, we tested whether Danish infants were more likely to ignore or accept consonant than vowel mispronunciations when matching familiar words with pictures. The infants successfully matched correctly pronounced familiar words with pictures but showed no vowel or consonant bias when matching mispronounced words with pictures. The lack of a bias for Danish vowels or consonants in familiar word recognition adds to evidence that lexical processing biases are language-specific and may additionally depend on developmental age and perhaps task difficulty.</p>","PeriodicalId":55608,"journal":{"name":"Phonetica","volume":" ","pages":"309-328"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Danish 20-month-olds' recognition of familiar words with and without consonant and vowel mispronunciations.\",\"authors\":\"Anders Højen,&nbsp;Thomas O Madsen,&nbsp;Dorthe Bleses\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/phon-2023-2001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Although several studies initially supported the proposal by Nespor et al. (Nespor, Marina, Marcela Peña & Jacques Mehler. 2003. On the different roles of vowels and consonants in speech processing and language acquisition. <i>Lingue e Linguaggio</i> 2. 221-247) that consonants are more informative than vowels in lexical processing, a more complex picture has emerged from recent research. Current evidence suggests that infants initially show a vowel bias in lexical processing and later transition to a consonant bias, possibly depending on the characteristics of the ambient language. Danish infants have shown a vowel bias in word learning at 20 months-an age at which infants learning French or Italian no longer show a vowel bias but rather a consonant bias, and infants learning English show no bias. The present study tested whether Danish 20-month-olds also have a vowel bias when recognizing <i>familiar</i> words. Specifically, using the Intermodal Preferential Looking paradigm, we tested whether Danish infants were more likely to ignore or accept consonant than vowel mispronunciations when matching familiar words with pictures. The infants successfully matched correctly pronounced familiar words with pictures but showed no vowel or consonant bias when matching mispronounced words with pictures. The lack of a bias for Danish vowels or consonants in familiar word recognition adds to evidence that lexical processing biases are language-specific and may additionally depend on developmental age and perhaps task difficulty.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Phonetica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"309-328\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Phonetica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/phon-2023-2001\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phonetica","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/phon-2023-2001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管一些研究最初支持Nespor等人的提议(Nespor,Marina,Marcela Peña和Jacques Mehler,2003)。元音和辅音在语音处理和语言习得中的不同作用。Lingue e Linguaggio 2。221-247)在词汇处理中,辅音比元音更具信息性,最近的研究显示出一幅更复杂的画面。目前的证据表明,婴儿在词汇处理中最初表现出元音偏误,后来转变为辅音偏误,这可能取决于环境语言的特点。丹麦婴儿在20个月大时在单词学习中表现出元音偏误,在这个年龄学习法语或意大利语的婴儿不再表现出元音偏误,而是表现出辅音偏误,学习英语的婴儿也没有表现出偏误。本研究测试了丹麦20个月大的孩子在识别熟悉单词时是否也有元音偏差。具体来说,使用跨模式优先注视范式,我们测试了丹麦婴儿在将熟悉的单词与图片进行匹配时,是否更容易忽视或接受辅音发音错误,而不是元音发音错误。这些婴儿成功地将发音正确的熟悉单词与图片进行了匹配,但在将发音错误的单词与图片匹配时,没有表现出元音或辅音偏差。在熟悉的单词识别中,对丹麦语元音或辅音没有偏见,这进一步证明了词汇处理偏见是特定于语言的,可能还取决于发育年龄和任务难度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Danish 20-month-olds' recognition of familiar words with and without consonant and vowel mispronunciations.

Although several studies initially supported the proposal by Nespor et al. (Nespor, Marina, Marcela Peña & Jacques Mehler. 2003. On the different roles of vowels and consonants in speech processing and language acquisition. Lingue e Linguaggio 2. 221-247) that consonants are more informative than vowels in lexical processing, a more complex picture has emerged from recent research. Current evidence suggests that infants initially show a vowel bias in lexical processing and later transition to a consonant bias, possibly depending on the characteristics of the ambient language. Danish infants have shown a vowel bias in word learning at 20 months-an age at which infants learning French or Italian no longer show a vowel bias but rather a consonant bias, and infants learning English show no bias. The present study tested whether Danish 20-month-olds also have a vowel bias when recognizing familiar words. Specifically, using the Intermodal Preferential Looking paradigm, we tested whether Danish infants were more likely to ignore or accept consonant than vowel mispronunciations when matching familiar words with pictures. The infants successfully matched correctly pronounced familiar words with pictures but showed no vowel or consonant bias when matching mispronounced words with pictures. The lack of a bias for Danish vowels or consonants in familiar word recognition adds to evidence that lexical processing biases are language-specific and may additionally depend on developmental age and perhaps task difficulty.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Phonetica
Phonetica 物理-声学
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Contemporary research into spoken language employs a wide range of approaches, from instrumental measures to perceptual and neurocognitive measures, to computational models, for investigating the properties and principles of speech in communicative settings across the world’s languages. ''Phonetica'' is an international interdisciplinary forum for phonetic science that covers all aspects of the subject matter, from phonetic and phonological descriptions of segments and prosodies to speech physiology, articulation, acoustics, perception, acquisition, and phonetic variation and change. ''Phonetica'' thus provides a platform for a comprehensive understanding of speaker-hearer interaction across languages and dialects, and of learning contexts throughout the lifespan. Papers published in this journal report expert original work that deals both with theoretical issues and with new empirical data, as well as with innovative methods and applications that will help to advance the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信