提高常规临床预约的数据质量-开发儿童和青少年创伤性牙齿损伤的最小数据集。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Dental Traumatology Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-14 DOI:10.1111/edt.12876
Kate P Kenny, Sue Pavitt, Robbie Foy, Peter F Day
{"title":"提高常规临床预约的数据质量-开发儿童和青少年创伤性牙齿损伤的最小数据集。","authors":"Kate P Kenny, Sue Pavitt, Robbie Foy, Peter F Day","doi":"10.1111/edt.12876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>It is currently difficult to evaluate the success or not of treatment for dental injuries due to poor recording of diagnostic and treatment codes in clinical dentistry. A minimum dataset comprises a standardised minimum set of outcomes along with a specified outcome measurement instrument, to allow aggregated use of data from routine clinical care appointments. This study aimed to determine which outcomes should be included in a minimum dataset for traumatic dental injuries (TDI).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a three-stage sequential, mixed-methods study, using evidence-based best practice for dataset development. Normalisation process theory informed the development of the study protocols. In Stage 1, semi-structured interviews with patients and their parent or guardian were undertaken to identify outcomes of importance to patients. In Stage 2, an online Delphi survey was undertaken to identify outcomes of importance to clinicians. In Stage 3, a National Consensus Meeting was undertaken involving patient representatives, clinicians and other stakeholders, to agree which outcomes should be included in the minimum dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stage 1: Eleven participants were recruited, five children and six parents. Two key themes emerged from the analysis-communication and aesthetics. In Stage 2, 34 dentists were recruited, and 32 completed both rounds of the survey (97% retention). Most outcomes were deemed by participants to be of 'critical importance', with three outcomes deemed 'important' and none to be 'of limited importance'. In Stage 3, 15 participants took part in the consensus meeting. Participants agreed that the dataset should comprise a list of clinician-important outcomes (pulp healing, periodontal healing, discolouration, tooth loss) and a list of patient-important outcomes (communication, aesthetics, pain, quality of life).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A Minimum Dataset for TDI has been developed using a robust and transparent methodology.</p>","PeriodicalId":55180,"journal":{"name":"Dental Traumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving data quality from routine clinical appointments-Development of a minimum dataset for traumatic dental injuries in children and adolescents.\",\"authors\":\"Kate P Kenny, Sue Pavitt, Robbie Foy, Peter F Day\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/edt.12876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>It is currently difficult to evaluate the success or not of treatment for dental injuries due to poor recording of diagnostic and treatment codes in clinical dentistry. A minimum dataset comprises a standardised minimum set of outcomes along with a specified outcome measurement instrument, to allow aggregated use of data from routine clinical care appointments. This study aimed to determine which outcomes should be included in a minimum dataset for traumatic dental injuries (TDI).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a three-stage sequential, mixed-methods study, using evidence-based best practice for dataset development. Normalisation process theory informed the development of the study protocols. In Stage 1, semi-structured interviews with patients and their parent or guardian were undertaken to identify outcomes of importance to patients. In Stage 2, an online Delphi survey was undertaken to identify outcomes of importance to clinicians. In Stage 3, a National Consensus Meeting was undertaken involving patient representatives, clinicians and other stakeholders, to agree which outcomes should be included in the minimum dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stage 1: Eleven participants were recruited, five children and six parents. Two key themes emerged from the analysis-communication and aesthetics. In Stage 2, 34 dentists were recruited, and 32 completed both rounds of the survey (97% retention). Most outcomes were deemed by participants to be of 'critical importance', with three outcomes deemed 'important' and none to be 'of limited importance'. In Stage 3, 15 participants took part in the consensus meeting. Participants agreed that the dataset should comprise a list of clinician-important outcomes (pulp healing, periodontal healing, discolouration, tooth loss) and a list of patient-important outcomes (communication, aesthetics, pain, quality of life).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A Minimum Dataset for TDI has been developed using a robust and transparent methodology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dental Traumatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dental Traumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12876\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12876","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景/目的:目前,由于临床牙科诊断和治疗代码记录不佳,很难评估治疗牙损伤的成功与否。最小数据集包括标准化的最小结果集以及指定的结果测量工具,以允许汇总使用来自常规临床护理预约的数据。本研究旨在确定创伤性牙齿损伤(TDI)的最小数据集应包括哪些结果。材料和方法:这是一个三阶段连续的混合方法研究,使用基于证据的数据集开发最佳实践。规范化过程理论为研究方案的制定提供了依据。在第一阶段,对患者及其父母或监护人进行半结构化访谈,以确定对患者重要的结果。在第二阶段,进行了在线德尔菲调查,以确定对临床医生重要的结果。在第三阶段,召开了一次全国共识会议,涉及患者代表、临床医生和其他利益相关者,以商定哪些结果应包括在最小数据集中。结果:第一阶段:招募了11名参与者,5名儿童和6名家长。分析中出现了两个关键主题——传播和美学。在第二阶段,共招募了34名牙医,其中32名完成了两轮调查(保留率97%)。大多数结果被参与者认为是“至关重要的”,有三个结果被认为是“重要的”,没有一个结果被认为是“有限重要的”。在第三阶段,15个参与者参加了共识会议。参与者同意数据集应包括临床重要结果列表(牙髓愈合、牙周愈合、变色、牙齿脱落)和患者重要结果列表(沟通、美学、疼痛、生活质量)。结论:使用稳健和透明的方法开发了TDI的最小数据集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving data quality from routine clinical appointments-Development of a minimum dataset for traumatic dental injuries in children and adolescents.

Background/aims: It is currently difficult to evaluate the success or not of treatment for dental injuries due to poor recording of diagnostic and treatment codes in clinical dentistry. A minimum dataset comprises a standardised minimum set of outcomes along with a specified outcome measurement instrument, to allow aggregated use of data from routine clinical care appointments. This study aimed to determine which outcomes should be included in a minimum dataset for traumatic dental injuries (TDI).

Materials and methods: This is a three-stage sequential, mixed-methods study, using evidence-based best practice for dataset development. Normalisation process theory informed the development of the study protocols. In Stage 1, semi-structured interviews with patients and their parent or guardian were undertaken to identify outcomes of importance to patients. In Stage 2, an online Delphi survey was undertaken to identify outcomes of importance to clinicians. In Stage 3, a National Consensus Meeting was undertaken involving patient representatives, clinicians and other stakeholders, to agree which outcomes should be included in the minimum dataset.

Results: Stage 1: Eleven participants were recruited, five children and six parents. Two key themes emerged from the analysis-communication and aesthetics. In Stage 2, 34 dentists were recruited, and 32 completed both rounds of the survey (97% retention). Most outcomes were deemed by participants to be of 'critical importance', with three outcomes deemed 'important' and none to be 'of limited importance'. In Stage 3, 15 participants took part in the consensus meeting. Participants agreed that the dataset should comprise a list of clinician-important outcomes (pulp healing, periodontal healing, discolouration, tooth loss) and a list of patient-important outcomes (communication, aesthetics, pain, quality of life).

Conclusion: A Minimum Dataset for TDI has been developed using a robust and transparent methodology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dental Traumatology
Dental Traumatology 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
32.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Dental Traumatology is an international journal that aims to convey scientific and clinical progress in all areas related to adult and pediatric dental traumatology. This includes the following topics: - Epidemiology, Social Aspects, Education, Diagnostics - Esthetics / Prosthetics/ Restorative - Evidence Based Traumatology & Study Design - Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery/Transplant/Implant - Pediatrics and Orthodontics - Prevention and Sports Dentistry - Endodontics and Periodontal Aspects The journal"s aim is to promote communication among clinicians, educators, researchers, and others interested in the field of dental traumatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信