伽马射线和紫外线-C灭菌对本土制备的去矿物质冻干骨异体移植物中 BMP-7 水平的影响

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 CELL BIOLOGY
Cell and Tissue Banking Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-14 DOI:10.1007/s10561-023-10103-2
Zainab Kamal, Arundeep Kaur Lamba, Farrukh Faraz, Shruti Tandon, Archita Datta, Nasreen Ansari, Zaid Kamal Madni, Jaya Pandey
{"title":"伽马射线和紫外线-C灭菌对本土制备的去矿物质冻干骨异体移植物中 BMP-7 水平的影响","authors":"Zainab Kamal, Arundeep Kaur Lamba, Farrukh Faraz, Shruti Tandon, Archita Datta, Nasreen Ansari, Zaid Kamal Madni, Jaya Pandey","doi":"10.1007/s10561-023-10103-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The presence of bone morphogenetic proteins in demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) are responsible for developing hard tissues in intraosseous defects. The most common mode of sterilization of bone allografts, i.e., Gamma rays, have dramatic effects on the structural and biological properties of DFDBA, leading to loss of BMPs. Ultraviolet-C radiation is a newer approach to sterilize biodegradable scaffolds, which is simple to use and ensures efficient sterilization. However, UV-C radiation has not yet been effectively studied to sterilize bone allografts. This study aimed to compare and evaluate the effectiveness of Gamma and Ultraviolet-C rays in sterilizing indigenously prepared DFDBA and assess their effect on the quantity of BMP-7 present in the allograft. DFDBA samples from non-irradiated, gamma irradiated, and UV-C irradiated groups were tested for BMP-7 level and samples sterilized with gamma and UV-C rays were analysed for sterility testing. The estimated mean BMP-7 level was highest in non-irradiated DFDBA samples, followed by UV-C irradiated, and the lowest in gamma irradiated samples. Our study concluded that UV-C rays effectively sterilized DFDBA as indicated by negative sterility test and comprised lesser degradation of BMP-7 than gamma irradiation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9723,"journal":{"name":"Cell and Tissue Banking","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of gamma and Ultraviolet-C sterilization on BMP-7 level of indigenously prepared demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft.\",\"authors\":\"Zainab Kamal, Arundeep Kaur Lamba, Farrukh Faraz, Shruti Tandon, Archita Datta, Nasreen Ansari, Zaid Kamal Madni, Jaya Pandey\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10561-023-10103-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The presence of bone morphogenetic proteins in demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) are responsible for developing hard tissues in intraosseous defects. The most common mode of sterilization of bone allografts, i.e., Gamma rays, have dramatic effects on the structural and biological properties of DFDBA, leading to loss of BMPs. Ultraviolet-C radiation is a newer approach to sterilize biodegradable scaffolds, which is simple to use and ensures efficient sterilization. However, UV-C radiation has not yet been effectively studied to sterilize bone allografts. This study aimed to compare and evaluate the effectiveness of Gamma and Ultraviolet-C rays in sterilizing indigenously prepared DFDBA and assess their effect on the quantity of BMP-7 present in the allograft. DFDBA samples from non-irradiated, gamma irradiated, and UV-C irradiated groups were tested for BMP-7 level and samples sterilized with gamma and UV-C rays were analysed for sterility testing. The estimated mean BMP-7 level was highest in non-irradiated DFDBA samples, followed by UV-C irradiated, and the lowest in gamma irradiated samples. Our study concluded that UV-C rays effectively sterilized DFDBA as indicated by negative sterility test and comprised lesser degradation of BMP-7 than gamma irradiation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cell and Tissue Banking\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cell and Tissue Banking\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-023-10103-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell and Tissue Banking","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-023-10103-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脱矿冻干骨异体移植物(DFDBA)中的骨形态发生蛋白是骨内缺损硬组织形成的主要成分。最常见的骨异体移植物灭菌方式,即伽马射线,会对 DFDBA 的结构和生物特性产生巨大影响,导致 BMPs 损失。紫外线-C 辐射是一种较新的生物可降解支架灭菌方法,使用简单,可确保高效灭菌。然而,紫外线-C 辐射在骨异体移植物灭菌方面尚未得到有效研究。本研究旨在比较和评估伽马射线和紫外线-C射线对本土制备的 DFDBA 的灭菌效果,并评估它们对同种异体骨中 BMP-7 数量的影响。对未经过辐照、伽马射线辐照和紫外线-C射线辐照组的DFDBA样本进行了BMP-7含量检测,并对经过伽马射线和紫外线-C射线灭菌的样本进行了无菌检测分析。未经辐照的 DFDBA 样品中 BMP-7 的估计平均水平最高,紫外线-C 照射组次之,伽马射线照射组最低。我们的研究得出结论,紫外线-C 照射能有效地对 DFDBA 进行灭菌,无菌测试结果呈阴性,与伽马射线照射相比,紫外线-C 照射对 BMP-7 的降解作用较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effect of gamma and Ultraviolet-C sterilization on BMP-7 level of indigenously prepared demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft.

Effect of gamma and Ultraviolet-C sterilization on BMP-7 level of indigenously prepared demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft.

The presence of bone morphogenetic proteins in demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) are responsible for developing hard tissues in intraosseous defects. The most common mode of sterilization of bone allografts, i.e., Gamma rays, have dramatic effects on the structural and biological properties of DFDBA, leading to loss of BMPs. Ultraviolet-C radiation is a newer approach to sterilize biodegradable scaffolds, which is simple to use and ensures efficient sterilization. However, UV-C radiation has not yet been effectively studied to sterilize bone allografts. This study aimed to compare and evaluate the effectiveness of Gamma and Ultraviolet-C rays in sterilizing indigenously prepared DFDBA and assess their effect on the quantity of BMP-7 present in the allograft. DFDBA samples from non-irradiated, gamma irradiated, and UV-C irradiated groups were tested for BMP-7 level and samples sterilized with gamma and UV-C rays were analysed for sterility testing. The estimated mean BMP-7 level was highest in non-irradiated DFDBA samples, followed by UV-C irradiated, and the lowest in gamma irradiated samples. Our study concluded that UV-C rays effectively sterilized DFDBA as indicated by negative sterility test and comprised lesser degradation of BMP-7 than gamma irradiation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cell and Tissue Banking
Cell and Tissue Banking CELL BIOLOGY-ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cell and Tissue Banking provides a forum for disseminating information to scientists and clinicians involved in the banking and transplantation of cells and tissues. Cell and Tissue Banking is an international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes original papers in the following areas: basic research concerning general aspects of tissue banking such as quality assurance and control of banked cells/tissues, effects of preservation and sterilisation methods on cells/tissues, biotechnology, etc.; clinical applications of banked cells/tissues; standards of practice in procurement, processing, storage and distribution of cells/tissues; ethical issues; medico-legal issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信