Yilin Pan, Christine Yim-Ping Wong, Haiying Ma, Ryan Tsz-Hei Tse, Carol Ka-Lo Cheng, Miaomiao Tan, Peter Ka-Fung Chiu, Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh, Xin Wang, Chi-Fai Ng, Liang Zhang
{"title":"定量比较肾盂尿和膀胱尿,研究下尿路对尿液蛋白质组的改变。","authors":"Yilin Pan, Christine Yim-Ping Wong, Haiying Ma, Ryan Tsz-Hei Tse, Carol Ka-Lo Cheng, Miaomiao Tan, Peter Ka-Fung Chiu, Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh, Xin Wang, Chi-Fai Ng, Liang Zhang","doi":"10.1002/prca.202300004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Urine proteome is a valuable reservoir of biomarkers for disease diagnosis and monitoring. Following formation as the plasma filtrate in the kidney, urine is progressively modified by the active reabsorption and secretion of the urinary tract. However, little is known about how the urine proteome changes as it passes along the urinary tract.</p><p><strong>Experimental design: </strong>To investigate this, we compared the proteome composition of the renal pelvis urine (RPU) and individually self-voided bladder urine (BU) collected from seven unilateral urinary tract obstruction male patients by LC-MS/MS screening. To our knowledge, this is the first proteomic comparison of RPU and BU samples from the same individual.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, RPU and BU proteomes did not exhibit proteins that were exclusively present in all samples of one urine type while in none of the other type. Nonetheless, BU had more overrepresented proteins that were observed at a higher frequency than RPU. Label-free quantitative analyses revealed BU-RPU differential proteins that are enriched in exosomes and extracellular proteins. However, the differences were not significant after corrections for multiple testing. Interestingly, we observed a significant increase of collagen peptides with hydroxyproline modifications in the BU samples, suggesting differences in protein modifications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical relevance: </strong>Our study revealed no substantial differences at the protein level between the BU and RPU samples. Future investigations with expanded cohorts would provide more insights about the urothelial-urinary interactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative comparison of the renal pelvic urine and bladder urine to examine modifications of the urine proteome by the lower urinary tract.\",\"authors\":\"Yilin Pan, Christine Yim-Ping Wong, Haiying Ma, Ryan Tsz-Hei Tse, Carol Ka-Lo Cheng, Miaomiao Tan, Peter Ka-Fung Chiu, Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh, Xin Wang, Chi-Fai Ng, Liang Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/prca.202300004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Urine proteome is a valuable reservoir of biomarkers for disease diagnosis and monitoring. Following formation as the plasma filtrate in the kidney, urine is progressively modified by the active reabsorption and secretion of the urinary tract. However, little is known about how the urine proteome changes as it passes along the urinary tract.</p><p><strong>Experimental design: </strong>To investigate this, we compared the proteome composition of the renal pelvis urine (RPU) and individually self-voided bladder urine (BU) collected from seven unilateral urinary tract obstruction male patients by LC-MS/MS screening. To our knowledge, this is the first proteomic comparison of RPU and BU samples from the same individual.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, RPU and BU proteomes did not exhibit proteins that were exclusively present in all samples of one urine type while in none of the other type. Nonetheless, BU had more overrepresented proteins that were observed at a higher frequency than RPU. Label-free quantitative analyses revealed BU-RPU differential proteins that are enriched in exosomes and extracellular proteins. However, the differences were not significant after corrections for multiple testing. Interestingly, we observed a significant increase of collagen peptides with hydroxyproline modifications in the BU samples, suggesting differences in protein modifications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical relevance: </strong>Our study revealed no substantial differences at the protein level between the BU and RPU samples. Future investigations with expanded cohorts would provide more insights about the urothelial-urinary interactions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/prca.202300004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/prca.202300004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:尿液蛋白质组是诊断和监测疾病的宝贵生物标志物库。尿液在肾脏中形成血浆滤液后,会通过泌尿道的主动重吸收和分泌而逐渐改变。然而,人们对尿液沿泌尿道排出时尿液蛋白质组的变化知之甚少:为了研究这个问题,我们通过 LC-MS/MS 筛选比较了从七名单侧尿路梗阻男性患者处收集的肾盂尿(RPU)和单独自排的膀胱尿(BU)的蛋白质组组成。据我们所知,这是首次对同一患者的肾盂尿和膀胱尿样本进行蛋白质组学比较:结果:总体而言,RPU 和 BU 蛋白质组并没有出现一种尿液样本中所有蛋白质都存在,而另一种尿液样本中却没有的情况。尽管如此,BU 蛋白质组中有更多的高代表性蛋白质,其出现频率高于 RPU。无标记定量分析显示,BU-RPU 差异蛋白质富含外泌体和细胞外蛋白质。然而,经多重检验校正后,差异并不显著。有趣的是,我们观察到 BU 样本中具有羟脯氨酸修饰的胶原肽明显增加,这表明蛋白质修饰存在差异:我们的研究表明,BU 和 RPU 样本在蛋白质水平上没有实质性差异。未来扩大样本群的研究将为尿路-泌尿系统相互作用提供更多信息。
Quantitative comparison of the renal pelvic urine and bladder urine to examine modifications of the urine proteome by the lower urinary tract.
Purpose: Urine proteome is a valuable reservoir of biomarkers for disease diagnosis and monitoring. Following formation as the plasma filtrate in the kidney, urine is progressively modified by the active reabsorption and secretion of the urinary tract. However, little is known about how the urine proteome changes as it passes along the urinary tract.
Experimental design: To investigate this, we compared the proteome composition of the renal pelvis urine (RPU) and individually self-voided bladder urine (BU) collected from seven unilateral urinary tract obstruction male patients by LC-MS/MS screening. To our knowledge, this is the first proteomic comparison of RPU and BU samples from the same individual.
Results: Overall, RPU and BU proteomes did not exhibit proteins that were exclusively present in all samples of one urine type while in none of the other type. Nonetheless, BU had more overrepresented proteins that were observed at a higher frequency than RPU. Label-free quantitative analyses revealed BU-RPU differential proteins that are enriched in exosomes and extracellular proteins. However, the differences were not significant after corrections for multiple testing. Interestingly, we observed a significant increase of collagen peptides with hydroxyproline modifications in the BU samples, suggesting differences in protein modifications.
Conclusions and clinical relevance: Our study revealed no substantial differences at the protein level between the BU and RPU samples. Future investigations with expanded cohorts would provide more insights about the urothelial-urinary interactions.