[反刍和分裂型人格特征]。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Éva Nikolett Fejes, Nóra Lilla Kovács, Imréné Bittermann, Eszter Blind, Ágoston Schmelowszky
{"title":"[反刍和分裂型人格特征]。","authors":"Éva Nikolett Fejes,&nbsp;Nóra Lilla Kovács,&nbsp;Imréné Bittermann,&nbsp;Eszter Blind,&nbsp;Ágoston Schmelowszky","doi":"10.18071/isz.76.0149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong><p>Although ru&shy;mination and schizotypal traits can be considered transdiagnostic phenomena and can occur within non-clinical population as well, a relatively small number of research has been carried out on the topic involving both patient and non clinical participants. The aim of this study is to examine the rela&shy;tionship between schizotypal traits and rumination using a transdiagnostic approach, involving participants living with psychotic disorders and sine morbo individuals.</p>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong><p>We recruited participants living with psychotic disorders (paranoid schizophrenia, hebephrenia, schizoaffective disorder, etc.) (n = 30) and controls who had not been diagnosed with any mental illnesses (n = 67). The connection between rumination and schizotypal traits was examined by self-report questionnaire method in a cross-sectional arrangement. The Oxford-Liverpool Inventory was used to measure schizotypal traits, and the Ruminative Thought Style Questionnaire was used to determine the level of rumination.&nbsp;</p>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><p>Schizotypal symptoms (&beta; = 0.575; p &lt; 0.001), especially cognitive disorganization (&beta; = 0.459; p &lt; 0.001) and unusual experiences (&beta; = 0.221; p = 0.029) significantly explained the degree of rumination.&nbsp;</p>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong><p>Our results support the hypothesis that the association between rumination and schizotypic traits is due to decreased cognitive inhibitory functions.</p>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50394,"journal":{"name":"Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Rumination and schizotypal personality traits].\",\"authors\":\"Éva Nikolett Fejes,&nbsp;Nóra Lilla Kovács,&nbsp;Imréné Bittermann,&nbsp;Eszter Blind,&nbsp;Ágoston Schmelowszky\",\"doi\":\"10.18071/isz.76.0149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong><p>Although ru&shy;mination and schizotypal traits can be considered transdiagnostic phenomena and can occur within non-clinical population as well, a relatively small number of research has been carried out on the topic involving both patient and non clinical participants. The aim of this study is to examine the rela&shy;tionship between schizotypal traits and rumination using a transdiagnostic approach, involving participants living with psychotic disorders and sine morbo individuals.</p>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong><p>We recruited participants living with psychotic disorders (paranoid schizophrenia, hebephrenia, schizoaffective disorder, etc.) (n = 30) and controls who had not been diagnosed with any mental illnesses (n = 67). The connection between rumination and schizotypal traits was examined by self-report questionnaire method in a cross-sectional arrangement. The Oxford-Liverpool Inventory was used to measure schizotypal traits, and the Ruminative Thought Style Questionnaire was used to determine the level of rumination.&nbsp;</p>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><p>Schizotypal symptoms (&beta; = 0.575; p &lt; 0.001), especially cognitive disorganization (&beta; = 0.459; p &lt; 0.001) and unusual experiences (&beta; = 0.221; p = 0.029) significantly explained the degree of rumination.&nbsp;</p>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong><p>Our results support the hypothesis that the association between rumination and schizotypic traits is due to decreased cognitive inhibitory functions.</p>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18071/isz.76.0149\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18071/isz.76.0149","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:虽然分裂和分裂型特征可以被认为是跨诊断现象,也可以发生在非临床人群中,但相对较少的研究已经开展了涉及患者和非临床参与者的主题。本研究的目的是利用跨诊断的方法来研究分裂型特征与反刍之间的关系,研究对象包括患有精神障碍的参与者和正常个体。方法:我们招募了患有精神障碍(偏执型精神分裂症、肝炎、分裂情感性障碍等)的参与者(n = 30)和未被诊断为任何精神疾病的对照组(n = 67)。采用横断面自述问卷法研究反刍与分裂型性状之间的关系。牛津-利物浦量表用于测量分裂型特征,反刍思维风格问卷用于确定反刍水平。结果:分裂型症状(& β;= 0.575;p & lt;0.001),尤其是认知紊乱(& β;= 0.459;p & lt;0.001)和不寻常的经历(β= 0.221;P = 0.029)显著解释了反刍程度。 结论:我们的研究结果支持了反刍与分裂型特征之间的关联是由于认知抑制功能下降所致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Rumination and schizotypal personality traits].

Background and purpose:

Although ru­mination and schizotypal traits can be considered transdiagnostic phenomena and can occur within non-clinical population as well, a relatively small number of research has been carried out on the topic involving both patient and non clinical participants. The aim of this study is to examine the rela­tionship between schizotypal traits and rumination using a transdiagnostic approach, involving participants living with psychotic disorders and sine morbo individuals.

.

Methods:

We recruited participants living with psychotic disorders (paranoid schizophrenia, hebephrenia, schizoaffective disorder, etc.) (n = 30) and controls who had not been diagnosed with any mental illnesses (n = 67). The connection between rumination and schizotypal traits was examined by self-report questionnaire method in a cross-sectional arrangement. The Oxford-Liverpool Inventory was used to measure schizotypal traits, and the Ruminative Thought Style Questionnaire was used to determine the level of rumination. 

.

Results:

Schizotypal symptoms (β = 0.575; p < 0.001), especially cognitive disorganization (β = 0.459; p < 0.001) and unusual experiences (β = 0.221; p = 0.029) significantly explained the degree of rumination. 

.

Conclusion:

Our results support the hypothesis that the association between rumination and schizotypic traits is due to decreased cognitive inhibitory functions.

.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience
Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Clinical Neuroscience (Ideggyógyászati Szemle) is to provide a forum for the exchange of clinical and scientific information for a multidisciplinary community. The Clinical Neuroscience will be of primary interest to neurologists, neurosurgeons, psychiatrist and clinical specialized psycholigists, neuroradiologists and clinical neurophysiologists, but original works in basic or computer science, epidemiology, pharmacology, etc., relating to the clinical practice with involvement of the central nervous system are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信