A comparison of endovascular coil systems for the treatment of small intracranial aneurysms.

BackgroundEndovascular coiling of small, intracranial aneurysms remains controversial and difficult, despite advances in technology.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed data for 62 small aneurysms (<3.99 mm) in 59 patients. Occlusion rates, complications rates, and coil packing densities were compared between subgroups based upon coil type and rupture status.ResultsRuptured aneurysms predominated (67.7%). Aneurysms measured 2.99 ± 0.63 mm by 2.51 ± 0.61 mm with an aspect ratio of 1.21 ± 0.34 mm. Brands included Optima (Balt) (29%), MicroVention Hydrogel (24.2%), and Penumbra SMART (19.4%) coil systems. Average packing density was 34.3 ± 13.5 mm³. Occlusion rate was 100% in unruptured aneurysms; 84% utilized adjuvant devices. For ruptured aneurysms, complete occlusion or stable neck remnant was achieved in 88.6% while recanalization occurred in 11.4%. No rebleeding occurred. Average packing density (p = 0.919) and coil type (p = 0.056) did not impact occlusion. Aspect ratio was smaller in aneurysms with technical complications (p = 0.281), and aneurysm volume was significantly smaller in those with coil protrusion (p = 0.018). Complication rates did not differ between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms (22.6 vs. 15.8%, p = 0.308) or coil types (p = 0.830).ConclusionDespite advances in embolization devices, coiling of small intracranial aneurysms is still scrutinized. High occlusion rates are achievable, especially in unruptured aneurysms, with coil type and packing density suggesting association with complete occlusion. Technical complications may be influenced by aneurysm geometry. Advances in endovascular technologies have revolutionized small aneurysm treatment, with this series demonstrating excellent aneurysm occlusion especially in unruptured aneurysms.