基于变压器的深度神经网络在数字乳腺断层合成图像上的乳腺癌分类。

IF 8.1 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Weonsuk Lee, Hyeonsoo Lee, Hyunjae Lee, Eun Kyung Park, Hyeonseob Nam, Thijs Kooi
{"title":"基于变压器的深度神经网络在数字乳腺断层合成图像上的乳腺癌分类。","authors":"Weonsuk Lee,&nbsp;Hyeonsoo Lee,&nbsp;Hyunjae Lee,&nbsp;Eun Kyung Park,&nbsp;Hyeonseob Nam,&nbsp;Thijs Kooi","doi":"10.1148/ryai.220159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop an efficient deep neural network model that incorporates context from neighboring image sections to detect breast cancer on digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The authors adopted a transformer architecture that analyzes neighboring sections of the DBT stack. The proposed method was compared with two baselines: an architecture based on three-dimensional (3D) convolutions and a two-dimensional model that analyzes each section individually. The models were trained with 5174 four-view DBT studies, validated with 1000 four-view DBT studies, and tested on 655 four-view DBT studies, which were retrospectively collected from nine institutions in the United States through an external entity. Methods were compared using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity at a fixed specificity, and specificity at a fixed sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On the test set of 655 DBT studies, both 3D models showed higher classification performance than did the per-section baseline model. The proposed transformer-based model showed a significant increase in AUC (0.88 vs 0.91, <i>P</i> = .002), sensitivity (81.0% vs 87.7%, <i>P</i> = .006), and specificity (80.5% vs 86.4%, <i>P</i> < .001) at clinically relevant operating points when compared with the single-DBT-section baseline. The transformer-based model used only 25% of the number of floating-point operations per second used by the 3D convolution model while demonstrating similar classification performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A transformer-based deep neural network using data from neighboring sections improved breast cancer classification performance compared with a per-section baseline model and was more efficient than a model using 3D convolutions.<b>Keywords:</b> Breast, Tomosynthesis, Diagnosis, Supervised Learning, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, Breast Cancer, Deep Neural Networks, Transformers <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":29787,"journal":{"name":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10245183/pdf/ryai.220159.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transformer-based Deep Neural Network for Breast Cancer Classification on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images.\",\"authors\":\"Weonsuk Lee,&nbsp;Hyeonsoo Lee,&nbsp;Hyunjae Lee,&nbsp;Eun Kyung Park,&nbsp;Hyeonseob Nam,&nbsp;Thijs Kooi\",\"doi\":\"10.1148/ryai.220159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop an efficient deep neural network model that incorporates context from neighboring image sections to detect breast cancer on digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The authors adopted a transformer architecture that analyzes neighboring sections of the DBT stack. The proposed method was compared with two baselines: an architecture based on three-dimensional (3D) convolutions and a two-dimensional model that analyzes each section individually. The models were trained with 5174 four-view DBT studies, validated with 1000 four-view DBT studies, and tested on 655 four-view DBT studies, which were retrospectively collected from nine institutions in the United States through an external entity. Methods were compared using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity at a fixed specificity, and specificity at a fixed sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On the test set of 655 DBT studies, both 3D models showed higher classification performance than did the per-section baseline model. The proposed transformer-based model showed a significant increase in AUC (0.88 vs 0.91, <i>P</i> = .002), sensitivity (81.0% vs 87.7%, <i>P</i> = .006), and specificity (80.5% vs 86.4%, <i>P</i> < .001) at clinically relevant operating points when compared with the single-DBT-section baseline. The transformer-based model used only 25% of the number of floating-point operations per second used by the 3D convolution model while demonstrating similar classification performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A transformer-based deep neural network using data from neighboring sections improved breast cancer classification performance compared with a per-section baseline model and was more efficient than a model using 3D convolutions.<b>Keywords:</b> Breast, Tomosynthesis, Diagnosis, Supervised Learning, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, Breast Cancer, Deep Neural Networks, Transformers <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2023.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29787,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10245183/pdf/ryai.220159.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.220159\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.220159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:建立一种有效的深度神经网络模型,该模型结合了相邻图像部分的上下文,用于数字乳腺断层合成(DBT)图像上的乳腺癌检测。材料和方法:作者采用了一种变压器架构来分析DBT堆栈的相邻部分。将所提出的方法与两个基线进行了比较:基于三维(3D)卷积的架构和单独分析每个部分的二维模型。这些模型通过5174项四视角DBT研究进行训练,1000项四视角DBT研究进行验证,并对655项四视角DBT研究进行测试,这些研究是通过外部实体从美国9个机构回顾性收集的。采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、固定特异度下的灵敏度和固定敏感性下的特异性进行比较。结果:在655个DBT研究的测试集上,两种3D模型都比每段基线模型表现出更高的分类性能。与单次dbt切片基线相比,提出的基于变压器的模型在临床相关操作点的AUC (0.88 vs 0.91, P = 0.002),灵敏度(81.0% vs 87.7%, P = 0.006)和特异性(80.5% vs 86.4%, P < 0.001)均显着增加。基于变压器的模型每秒使用的浮点运算次数仅为3D卷积模型的25%,同时显示出相似的分类性能。结论:与每个切片基线模型相比,基于变压器的深度神经网络使用邻近切片数据提高了乳腺癌分类性能,并且比使用3D卷积的模型更有效。关键词:乳房,断层合成,诊断,监督学习,卷积神经网络(CNN),数字乳房断层合成,乳腺癌,深度神经网络,变压器。©rsna, 2023。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transformer-based Deep Neural Network for Breast Cancer Classification on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images.

Purpose: To develop an efficient deep neural network model that incorporates context from neighboring image sections to detect breast cancer on digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images.

Materials and methods: The authors adopted a transformer architecture that analyzes neighboring sections of the DBT stack. The proposed method was compared with two baselines: an architecture based on three-dimensional (3D) convolutions and a two-dimensional model that analyzes each section individually. The models were trained with 5174 four-view DBT studies, validated with 1000 four-view DBT studies, and tested on 655 four-view DBT studies, which were retrospectively collected from nine institutions in the United States through an external entity. Methods were compared using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity at a fixed specificity, and specificity at a fixed sensitivity.

Results: On the test set of 655 DBT studies, both 3D models showed higher classification performance than did the per-section baseline model. The proposed transformer-based model showed a significant increase in AUC (0.88 vs 0.91, P = .002), sensitivity (81.0% vs 87.7%, P = .006), and specificity (80.5% vs 86.4%, P < .001) at clinically relevant operating points when compared with the single-DBT-section baseline. The transformer-based model used only 25% of the number of floating-point operations per second used by the 3D convolution model while demonstrating similar classification performance.

Conclusion: A transformer-based deep neural network using data from neighboring sections improved breast cancer classification performance compared with a per-section baseline model and was more efficient than a model using 3D convolutions.Keywords: Breast, Tomosynthesis, Diagnosis, Supervised Learning, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, Breast Cancer, Deep Neural Networks, Transformers Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2023.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
1.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Radiology: Artificial Intelligence is a bi-monthly publication that focuses on the emerging applications of machine learning and artificial intelligence in the field of imaging across various disciplines. This journal is available online and accepts multiple manuscript types, including Original Research, Technical Developments, Data Resources, Review articles, Editorials, Letters to the Editor and Replies, Special Reports, and AI in Brief.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信