Antonella Bertucci, Ruth C Wilkins, Sylvie Lachapelle, Helen C Turner, David J Brenner, Guy Garty
{"title":"基于分离淋巴细胞和全血的 CBMN 检测法在辐射分诊中的应用比较。","authors":"Antonella Bertucci, Ruth C Wilkins, Sylvie Lachapelle, Helen C Turner, David J Brenner, Guy Garty","doi":"10.1159/000533488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Following a mass-casualty nuclear/radiological event, there will be an important need for rapid and accurate estimation of absorbed dose for biological triage. The cytokinesis-block micronucleus (CBMN) assay is an established and validated cytogenetic biomarker used to assess DNA damage in irradiated peripheral blood lymphocytes. Here, we describe an intercomparison experiment between two biodosimetry laboratories, located at Columbia University (CU) and Health Canada (HC) that performed different variants of the human blood CBMN assay to reconstruct dose in human blood, with CU performing the assay on isolated lymphocytes and using semi-automated scoring whereas HC used the more conventional whole blood assay. Although the micronucleus yields varied significantly between the two assays, the predicted doses closely matched up to 4 Gy - the range from which the HC calibration curve was previously established. These results highlight the importance of a robust calibration curve(s) across a wide age range of donors that match the exposure scenario as closely as possible and that will account for differences in methodology between laboratories. We have seen that at low doses, variability in the results may be attributed to variation in the processing while at higher doses the variation is dominated by inter-individual variation in cell proliferation. This interlaboratory collaboration further highlights the usefulness of the CBMN endpoint to accurately reconstruct absorbed dose in human blood after ionizing radiation exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":11206,"journal":{"name":"Cytogenetic and Genome Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10859551/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Isolated Lymphocyte and Whole Blood-Based CBMN Assays for Radiation Triage.\",\"authors\":\"Antonella Bertucci, Ruth C Wilkins, Sylvie Lachapelle, Helen C Turner, David J Brenner, Guy Garty\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000533488\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Following a mass-casualty nuclear/radiological event, there will be an important need for rapid and accurate estimation of absorbed dose for biological triage. The cytokinesis-block micronucleus (CBMN) assay is an established and validated cytogenetic biomarker used to assess DNA damage in irradiated peripheral blood lymphocytes. Here, we describe an intercomparison experiment between two biodosimetry laboratories, located at Columbia University (CU) and Health Canada (HC) that performed different variants of the human blood CBMN assay to reconstruct dose in human blood, with CU performing the assay on isolated lymphocytes and using semi-automated scoring whereas HC used the more conventional whole blood assay. Although the micronucleus yields varied significantly between the two assays, the predicted doses closely matched up to 4 Gy - the range from which the HC calibration curve was previously established. These results highlight the importance of a robust calibration curve(s) across a wide age range of donors that match the exposure scenario as closely as possible and that will account for differences in methodology between laboratories. We have seen that at low doses, variability in the results may be attributed to variation in the processing while at higher doses the variation is dominated by inter-individual variation in cell proliferation. This interlaboratory collaboration further highlights the usefulness of the CBMN endpoint to accurately reconstruct absorbed dose in human blood after ionizing radiation exposure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cytogenetic and Genome Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10859551/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cytogenetic and Genome Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000533488\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cytogenetic and Genome Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000533488","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
发生大规模核伤亡/放射事件后,需要快速准确地估算吸收剂量,以便进行生物分流。细胞因子阻滞微核(CBMN)检测是一种成熟且有效的细胞遗传生物标志物,用于评估辐照外周血淋巴细胞中的 DNA 损伤。在这里,我们描述了哥伦比亚大学(CU)和加拿大卫生部(HC)的两个生物模拟实验室之间的相互比较实验,这两个实验室采用了不同的人体血液 CBMN 检测方法来重建人体血液中的剂量,其中哥伦比亚大学对分离的淋巴细胞进行检测,并采用半自动评分法,而加拿大卫生部则采用更传统的全血检测方法。虽然两种检测方法的微核产率差异很大,但预测的剂量在 4 Gy 之前非常吻合,而 HC 的校准曲线正是在这一范围内建立的。这些结果凸显了在广泛的年龄范围内建立一条(多条)稳健的校准曲线的重要性,该曲线应尽可能与暴露情况相匹配,并能考虑到实验室之间方法的差异。我们看到,在低剂量时,结果的差异可能归因于处理过程中的差异,而在高剂量时,差异则主要由细胞增殖的个体间差异造成。这次实验室间的合作进一步凸显了 CBMN 终点在准确重建电离辐射照射后人体血液吸收剂量方面的实用性。
Comparison of Isolated Lymphocyte and Whole Blood-Based CBMN Assays for Radiation Triage.
Following a mass-casualty nuclear/radiological event, there will be an important need for rapid and accurate estimation of absorbed dose for biological triage. The cytokinesis-block micronucleus (CBMN) assay is an established and validated cytogenetic biomarker used to assess DNA damage in irradiated peripheral blood lymphocytes. Here, we describe an intercomparison experiment between two biodosimetry laboratories, located at Columbia University (CU) and Health Canada (HC) that performed different variants of the human blood CBMN assay to reconstruct dose in human blood, with CU performing the assay on isolated lymphocytes and using semi-automated scoring whereas HC used the more conventional whole blood assay. Although the micronucleus yields varied significantly between the two assays, the predicted doses closely matched up to 4 Gy - the range from which the HC calibration curve was previously established. These results highlight the importance of a robust calibration curve(s) across a wide age range of donors that match the exposure scenario as closely as possible and that will account for differences in methodology between laboratories. We have seen that at low doses, variability in the results may be attributed to variation in the processing while at higher doses the variation is dominated by inter-individual variation in cell proliferation. This interlaboratory collaboration further highlights the usefulness of the CBMN endpoint to accurately reconstruct absorbed dose in human blood after ionizing radiation exposure.
期刊介绍:
During the last decades, ''Cytogenetic and Genome Research'' has been the leading forum for original reports and reviews in human and animal cytogenetics, including molecular, clinical and comparative cytogenetics. In recent years, most of its papers have centered on genome research, including gene cloning and sequencing, gene mapping, gene regulation and expression, cancer genetics, comparative genetics, gene linkage and related areas. The journal also publishes key papers on chromosome aberrations in somatic, meiotic and malignant cells. Its scope has expanded to include studies on invertebrate and plant cytogenetics and genomics. Also featured are the vast majority of the reports of the International Workshops on Human Chromosome Mapping, the reports of international human and animal chromosome nomenclature committees, and proceedings of the American and European cytogenetic conferences and other events. In addition to regular issues, the journal has been publishing since 2002 a series of topical issues on a broad variety of themes from cytogenetic and genome research.