{"title":"乳腺筛查项目中特定项目乳房X光检查乳腺密度相关指南和实践的范围审查","authors":"Jessica O’Driscoll , Aileen Burke , Therese Mooney , Niall Phelan , Paola Baldelli , Alan Smith , Suzanne Lynch , Patricia Fitzpatrick , Kathleen Bennett , Fidelma Flanagan , Maeve Mullooly","doi":"10.1016/j.ejro.2023.100510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>High mammographic breast density (MBD) is an independent breast cancer risk factor. In organised breast screening settings, discussions are ongoing regarding the optimal clinical role of MBD to help guide screening decisions. The aim of this scoping review was to provide an overview of current practices incorporating MBD within population-based breast screening programmes and from professional organisations internationally.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This scoping review was conducted in accordance with the framework proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. The electronic databases, MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, CINAHL Plus, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched. Grey literature sources, websites of international breast screening programmes, and relevant government organisations were searched to identify further relevant literature. Data from identified materials were extracted and presented as a narrative summary.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The search identified 78 relevant documents. Documents were identified for breast screening programmes in 18 countries relating to screening intervals for women with dense breasts, MBD measurement, reporting, notification, and guiding supplemental screening. Documents were identified from 18 international professional organisations with the majority of material relating to supplemental screening guidance for women with dense breasts. Key factors collated during the data extraction process as relevant considerations for MBD practices included the evidence base needed to inform decision-making processes and resources (healthcare system costs, radiology equipment, and workforce planning).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This scoping review summarises current practices and guidelines incorporating MBD in international population-based breast screening settings and highlights the absence of consensus between organised breast screening programmes incorporating MBD in current breast screening protocols.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38076,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10407884/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A scoping review of programme specific mammographic breast density related guidelines and practices within breast screening programmes\",\"authors\":\"Jessica O’Driscoll , Aileen Burke , Therese Mooney , Niall Phelan , Paola Baldelli , Alan Smith , Suzanne Lynch , Patricia Fitzpatrick , Kathleen Bennett , Fidelma Flanagan , Maeve Mullooly\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejro.2023.100510\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>High mammographic breast density (MBD) is an independent breast cancer risk factor. In organised breast screening settings, discussions are ongoing regarding the optimal clinical role of MBD to help guide screening decisions. The aim of this scoping review was to provide an overview of current practices incorporating MBD within population-based breast screening programmes and from professional organisations internationally.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This scoping review was conducted in accordance with the framework proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. The electronic databases, MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, CINAHL Plus, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched. Grey literature sources, websites of international breast screening programmes, and relevant government organisations were searched to identify further relevant literature. Data from identified materials were extracted and presented as a narrative summary.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The search identified 78 relevant documents. Documents were identified for breast screening programmes in 18 countries relating to screening intervals for women with dense breasts, MBD measurement, reporting, notification, and guiding supplemental screening. Documents were identified from 18 international professional organisations with the majority of material relating to supplemental screening guidance for women with dense breasts. Key factors collated during the data extraction process as relevant considerations for MBD practices included the evidence base needed to inform decision-making processes and resources (healthcare system costs, radiology equipment, and workforce planning).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This scoping review summarises current practices and guidelines incorporating MBD in international population-based breast screening settings and highlights the absence of consensus between organised breast screening programmes incorporating MBD in current breast screening protocols.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Radiology Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10407884/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Radiology Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047723000369\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047723000369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
高乳腺密度(MBD)是一个独立的乳腺癌症危险因素。在有组织的乳腺筛查环境中,正在讨论MBD的最佳临床作用,以帮助指导筛查决策。这项范围界定审查的目的是概述目前将MBD纳入基于人群的乳腺筛查计划和国际专业组织的做法。方法根据乔安娜·布里格斯研究所提出的框架进行范围审查。系统检索了MEDLINE(PubMed)、EMBASE、CINAHL Plus、Scopus和Web of Science等电子数据库。搜索灰色文献来源、国际乳腺筛查项目网站和相关政府组织,以确定进一步的相关文献。从已确定的材料中提取数据,并作为叙述性摘要呈现。结果检索到78份相关文献。为18个国家的乳腺筛查计划确定了与乳房致密妇女筛查间隔、MBD测量、报告、通知和指导补充筛查有关的文件。文件来自18个国际专业组织,其中大部分材料与乳房致密女性的补充筛查指南有关。在数据提取过程中,作为MBD实践的相关考虑因素,整理的关键因素包括为决策过程和资源(医疗系统成本、放射设备和劳动力规划)提供信息所需的证据基础。结论本范围审查总结了将MBD纳入国际人群乳腺筛查的当前实践和指南并强调了在当前乳腺筛查方案中纳入MBD的有组织乳腺筛查计划之间缺乏共识。
A scoping review of programme specific mammographic breast density related guidelines and practices within breast screening programmes
Introduction
High mammographic breast density (MBD) is an independent breast cancer risk factor. In organised breast screening settings, discussions are ongoing regarding the optimal clinical role of MBD to help guide screening decisions. The aim of this scoping review was to provide an overview of current practices incorporating MBD within population-based breast screening programmes and from professional organisations internationally.
Methods
This scoping review was conducted in accordance with the framework proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. The electronic databases, MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, CINAHL Plus, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched. Grey literature sources, websites of international breast screening programmes, and relevant government organisations were searched to identify further relevant literature. Data from identified materials were extracted and presented as a narrative summary.
Results
The search identified 78 relevant documents. Documents were identified for breast screening programmes in 18 countries relating to screening intervals for women with dense breasts, MBD measurement, reporting, notification, and guiding supplemental screening. Documents were identified from 18 international professional organisations with the majority of material relating to supplemental screening guidance for women with dense breasts. Key factors collated during the data extraction process as relevant considerations for MBD practices included the evidence base needed to inform decision-making processes and resources (healthcare system costs, radiology equipment, and workforce planning).
Conclusions
This scoping review summarises current practices and guidelines incorporating MBD in international population-based breast screening settings and highlights the absence of consensus between organised breast screening programmes incorporating MBD in current breast screening protocols.