大卫和雅各布手术治疗二尖瓣主动脉瓣膜患者30年的结果——系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Ashley R Wilson-Smith, Christian J Wilson-Smith, Jemilla Strode Smith, Dominic Ng, Benjamin T Muston, Aditya Eranki, Michael L Williams
{"title":"大卫和雅各布手术治疗二尖瓣主动脉瓣膜患者30年的结果——系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Ashley R Wilson-Smith,&nbsp;Christian J Wilson-Smith,&nbsp;Jemilla Strode Smith,&nbsp;Dominic Ng,&nbsp;Benjamin T Muston,&nbsp;Aditya Eranki,&nbsp;Michael L Williams","doi":"10.21037/acs-2023-avs2-19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Valve-sparing aortic procedures, including the David and Yacoub procedures, have emerged as the dominant approaches in aortic aneurysm surgery, preserving the native aortic valve and thereby conferring significant prognostic benefits to the patient. Over the years, these procedures have also shown promise in patients with bicuspid valve-related aortopathy. This systematic review and meta-analysis presents the most up-to-date data on perioperative outcomes, freedom from secondary reoperation, and freedom from mortality for bicuspid valve patients undergoing valve-sparing aortic operations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The methods for this systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. Four databases were searched, ultimately yielding 19 papers for inclusion, using appropriate search terminology. Meta-analysis using proportions or means, as appropriate, were applied. Kaplan-Meier curves were digitized and aggregated using previously validated techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,159 patients were included. Males accounted for 87.4% of the cohort. The mean age of the cohort was 44.9 years. The mean aortic root diameter was estimated to be 46.3 mm, with an estimated range from 38 to 54 mm. Thirty-day mortality rate was estimated to be 1.7%. Eighty-five percent of patients in this series received the David approach, with the remainder receiving the Yacoub approach. Overall, there was low heterogeneity observed for the mean length of intensive care stay, while high heterogeneity was observed for the other remaining variables of interest. Kaplan-Meier survival estimation at 5, 10, and 15 years was 96%, 90%, and 87%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier freedom from secondary reoperation at 5, 10, and 15 years was 96%, 91%, and 88%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review demonstrates the durability and safety of the David and Yacoub valve-sparing procedures across long-term follow-up in bicuspid aortic valve patients. These procedures offer significant freedom from mortality and secondary reoperations on the aorta and valve and will likely continue to demonstrate excellent results into the future. There is a clear transition towards the David procedure, with the bulk of contemporary literature publishing on this technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/87/bf/acs-12-04-286.PMC10405344.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The outcomes of three decades of the David and Yacoub procedures in bicuspid aortic valve patients-a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ashley R Wilson-Smith,&nbsp;Christian J Wilson-Smith,&nbsp;Jemilla Strode Smith,&nbsp;Dominic Ng,&nbsp;Benjamin T Muston,&nbsp;Aditya Eranki,&nbsp;Michael L Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/acs-2023-avs2-19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Valve-sparing aortic procedures, including the David and Yacoub procedures, have emerged as the dominant approaches in aortic aneurysm surgery, preserving the native aortic valve and thereby conferring significant prognostic benefits to the patient. Over the years, these procedures have also shown promise in patients with bicuspid valve-related aortopathy. This systematic review and meta-analysis presents the most up-to-date data on perioperative outcomes, freedom from secondary reoperation, and freedom from mortality for bicuspid valve patients undergoing valve-sparing aortic operations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The methods for this systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. Four databases were searched, ultimately yielding 19 papers for inclusion, using appropriate search terminology. Meta-analysis using proportions or means, as appropriate, were applied. Kaplan-Meier curves were digitized and aggregated using previously validated techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,159 patients were included. Males accounted for 87.4% of the cohort. The mean age of the cohort was 44.9 years. The mean aortic root diameter was estimated to be 46.3 mm, with an estimated range from 38 to 54 mm. Thirty-day mortality rate was estimated to be 1.7%. Eighty-five percent of patients in this series received the David approach, with the remainder receiving the Yacoub approach. Overall, there was low heterogeneity observed for the mean length of intensive care stay, while high heterogeneity was observed for the other remaining variables of interest. Kaplan-Meier survival estimation at 5, 10, and 15 years was 96%, 90%, and 87%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier freedom from secondary reoperation at 5, 10, and 15 years was 96%, 91%, and 88%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review demonstrates the durability and safety of the David and Yacoub valve-sparing procedures across long-term follow-up in bicuspid aortic valve patients. These procedures offer significant freedom from mortality and secondary reoperations on the aorta and valve and will likely continue to demonstrate excellent results into the future. There is a clear transition towards the David procedure, with the bulk of contemporary literature publishing on this technique.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/87/bf/acs-12-04-286.PMC10405344.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/acs-2023-avs2-19\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/acs-2023-avs2-19","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:保留主动脉瓣的手术,包括David和Yacoub手术,已经成为主动脉瘤手术的主要方法,保留了原有的主动脉瓣,从而给患者带来了显著的预后益处。多年来,这些手术在双尖瓣相关主动脉病变患者中也显示出希望。本系统综述和荟萃分析提供了最新的关于二尖瓣患者接受保留瓣主动脉手术的围手术期结局、免于二次再手术和免于死亡的数据。方法:本系统评价和荟萃分析的方法遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目声明。检索了四个数据库,使用适当的检索术语,最终产生了19篇论文。采用适当的比例或方法进行meta分析。Kaplan-Meier曲线使用先前验证的技术进行数字化和聚合。结果:共纳入1159例患者。男性占该队列的87.4%。该队列的平均年龄为44.9岁。平均主动脉根直径估计为46.3 mm,估计范围为38 - 54 mm。30天死亡率估计为1.7%。在这个系列中,85%的患者接受了大卫疗法,其余的接受了雅各布疗法。总体而言,平均重症监护时间的异质性较低,而其他相关变量的异质性较高。5年、10年和15年的Kaplan-Meier生存估计分别为96%、90%和87%。5年、10年和15年再次手术Kaplan-Meier自由度分别为96%、91%和88%。结论:本综述在对双尖瓣主动脉瓣患者的长期随访中证明了David和Yacoub保留瓣膜手术的耐久性和安全性。这些手术提供了显著的死亡率和主动脉和瓣膜的二次再手术,并可能在未来继续显示出良好的效果。有一个明显的过渡到大卫程序,与大量当代文学出版的这种技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The outcomes of three decades of the David and Yacoub procedures in bicuspid aortic valve patients-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The outcomes of three decades of the David and Yacoub procedures in bicuspid aortic valve patients-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The outcomes of three decades of the David and Yacoub procedures in bicuspid aortic valve patients-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The outcomes of three decades of the David and Yacoub procedures in bicuspid aortic valve patients-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Valve-sparing aortic procedures, including the David and Yacoub procedures, have emerged as the dominant approaches in aortic aneurysm surgery, preserving the native aortic valve and thereby conferring significant prognostic benefits to the patient. Over the years, these procedures have also shown promise in patients with bicuspid valve-related aortopathy. This systematic review and meta-analysis presents the most up-to-date data on perioperative outcomes, freedom from secondary reoperation, and freedom from mortality for bicuspid valve patients undergoing valve-sparing aortic operations.

Methods: The methods for this systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. Four databases were searched, ultimately yielding 19 papers for inclusion, using appropriate search terminology. Meta-analysis using proportions or means, as appropriate, were applied. Kaplan-Meier curves were digitized and aggregated using previously validated techniques.

Results: A total of 1,159 patients were included. Males accounted for 87.4% of the cohort. The mean age of the cohort was 44.9 years. The mean aortic root diameter was estimated to be 46.3 mm, with an estimated range from 38 to 54 mm. Thirty-day mortality rate was estimated to be 1.7%. Eighty-five percent of patients in this series received the David approach, with the remainder receiving the Yacoub approach. Overall, there was low heterogeneity observed for the mean length of intensive care stay, while high heterogeneity was observed for the other remaining variables of interest. Kaplan-Meier survival estimation at 5, 10, and 15 years was 96%, 90%, and 87%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier freedom from secondary reoperation at 5, 10, and 15 years was 96%, 91%, and 88%, respectively.

Conclusions: This review demonstrates the durability and safety of the David and Yacoub valve-sparing procedures across long-term follow-up in bicuspid aortic valve patients. These procedures offer significant freedom from mortality and secondary reoperations on the aorta and valve and will likely continue to demonstrate excellent results into the future. There is a clear transition towards the David procedure, with the bulk of contemporary literature publishing on this technique.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信