基于深度学习的脑实质和脑室系统CT扫描异常分割。

Annika Gerken, Sina Walluscheck, Peter Kohlmann, Ivana Galinovic, Kersten Villringer, Jochen B Fiebach, Jan Klein, Stefan Heldmann
{"title":"基于深度学习的脑实质和脑室系统CT扫描异常分割。","authors":"Annika Gerken,&nbsp;Sina Walluscheck,&nbsp;Peter Kohlmann,&nbsp;Ivana Galinovic,&nbsp;Kersten Villringer,&nbsp;Jochen B Fiebach,&nbsp;Jan Klein,&nbsp;Stefan Heldmann","doi":"10.3389/fnimg.2023.1228255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The automatic segmentation of brain parenchyma and cerebrospinal fluid-filled spaces such as the ventricular system is the first step for quantitative and qualitative analysis of brain CT data. For clinical practice and especially for diagnostics, it is crucial that such a method is robust to anatomical variability and pathological changes such as (hemorrhagic or neoplastic) lesions and chronic defects. This study investigates the increase in overall robustness of a deep learning algorithm that is gained by adding hemorrhage training data to an otherwise normal training cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 2D U-Net is trained on subjects with normal appearing brain anatomy. In a second experiment the training data includes additional subjects with brain hemorrhage on image data of the RSNA Brain CT Hemorrhage Challenge with custom reference segmentations. The resulting networks are evaluated on normal and hemorrhage test casesseparately, and on an independent test set of patients with brain tumors of the publicly available GLIS-RT dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adding data with hemorrhage to the training set significantly improves the segmentation performance over an algorithm trained exclusively on normally appearing data, not only in the hemorrhage test set but also in the tumor test set. The performance on normally appearing data is stable. Overall, the improved algorithm achieves median Dice scores of 0.98 (parenchyma), 0.91 (left ventricle), 0.90 (right ventricle), 0.81 (third ventricle), and 0.80 (fourth ventricle) on the hemorrhage test set. On the tumor test set, the median Dice scores are 0.96 (parenchyma), 0.90 (left ventricle), 0.90 (right ventricle), 0.75 (third ventricle), and 0.73 (fourth ventricle).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Training on an extended data set that includes pathologies is crucial and significantly increases the overall robustness of a segmentation algorithm for brain parenchyma and ventricular system in CT data, also for anomalies completely unseen during training. Extension of the training set to include other diseases may further improve the generalizability of the algorithm.</p>","PeriodicalId":73094,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in neuroimaging","volume":"2 ","pages":"1228255"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10406198/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep learning-based segmentation of brain parenchyma and ventricular system in CT scans in the presence of anomalies.\",\"authors\":\"Annika Gerken,&nbsp;Sina Walluscheck,&nbsp;Peter Kohlmann,&nbsp;Ivana Galinovic,&nbsp;Kersten Villringer,&nbsp;Jochen B Fiebach,&nbsp;Jan Klein,&nbsp;Stefan Heldmann\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fnimg.2023.1228255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The automatic segmentation of brain parenchyma and cerebrospinal fluid-filled spaces such as the ventricular system is the first step for quantitative and qualitative analysis of brain CT data. For clinical practice and especially for diagnostics, it is crucial that such a method is robust to anatomical variability and pathological changes such as (hemorrhagic or neoplastic) lesions and chronic defects. This study investigates the increase in overall robustness of a deep learning algorithm that is gained by adding hemorrhage training data to an otherwise normal training cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 2D U-Net is trained on subjects with normal appearing brain anatomy. In a second experiment the training data includes additional subjects with brain hemorrhage on image data of the RSNA Brain CT Hemorrhage Challenge with custom reference segmentations. The resulting networks are evaluated on normal and hemorrhage test casesseparately, and on an independent test set of patients with brain tumors of the publicly available GLIS-RT dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adding data with hemorrhage to the training set significantly improves the segmentation performance over an algorithm trained exclusively on normally appearing data, not only in the hemorrhage test set but also in the tumor test set. The performance on normally appearing data is stable. Overall, the improved algorithm achieves median Dice scores of 0.98 (parenchyma), 0.91 (left ventricle), 0.90 (right ventricle), 0.81 (third ventricle), and 0.80 (fourth ventricle) on the hemorrhage test set. On the tumor test set, the median Dice scores are 0.96 (parenchyma), 0.90 (left ventricle), 0.90 (right ventricle), 0.75 (third ventricle), and 0.73 (fourth ventricle).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Training on an extended data set that includes pathologies is crucial and significantly increases the overall robustness of a segmentation algorithm for brain parenchyma and ventricular system in CT data, also for anomalies completely unseen during training. Extension of the training set to include other diseases may further improve the generalizability of the algorithm.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in neuroimaging\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"1228255\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10406198/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in neuroimaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnimg.2023.1228255\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnimg.2023.1228255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对脑实质和脑室系统等充满脑脊液的空间进行自动分割是对脑CT数据进行定量和定性分析的第一步。对于临床实践,特别是诊断,这种方法对解剖变异性和病理变化如(出血性或肿瘤性)病变和慢性缺陷是至关重要的。本研究探讨了通过将出血训练数据添加到其他正常训练队列中获得的深度学习算法的整体鲁棒性的增加。方法:对脑解剖结构正常的受试者进行二维U-Net训练。在第二个实验中,训练数据包括在RSNA脑CT出血挑战的图像数据上附加的脑出血受试者,并使用自定义参考分割。结果网络分别在正常和出血测试病例上进行评估,并在公开可用的GLIS-RT数据集的脑肿瘤患者的独立测试集上进行评估。结果:与只训练正常数据的算法相比,将出血数据添加到训练集中可以显著提高分割性能,不仅在出血测试集中,而且在肿瘤测试集中也是如此。对正常数据的处理性能稳定。总体而言,改进算法在出血测试集上的Dice中值分别为0.98(实质)、0.91(左心室)、0.90(右心室)、0.81(第三心室)和0.80(第四心室)。在肿瘤测试集上,Dice得分中位数分别为0.96(实质)、0.90(左心室)、0.90(右心室)、0.75(第三心室)和0.73(第四心室)。结论:在包含病理的扩展数据集上进行训练是至关重要的,它显著提高了CT数据中脑实质和心室系统分割算法的整体鲁棒性,也提高了训练中完全看不见的异常的鲁棒性。将训练集扩展到其他疾病可以进一步提高算法的泛化性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Deep learning-based segmentation of brain parenchyma and ventricular system in CT scans in the presence of anomalies.

Deep learning-based segmentation of brain parenchyma and ventricular system in CT scans in the presence of anomalies.

Deep learning-based segmentation of brain parenchyma and ventricular system in CT scans in the presence of anomalies.

Deep learning-based segmentation of brain parenchyma and ventricular system in CT scans in the presence of anomalies.

Introduction: The automatic segmentation of brain parenchyma and cerebrospinal fluid-filled spaces such as the ventricular system is the first step for quantitative and qualitative analysis of brain CT data. For clinical practice and especially for diagnostics, it is crucial that such a method is robust to anatomical variability and pathological changes such as (hemorrhagic or neoplastic) lesions and chronic defects. This study investigates the increase in overall robustness of a deep learning algorithm that is gained by adding hemorrhage training data to an otherwise normal training cohort.

Methods: A 2D U-Net is trained on subjects with normal appearing brain anatomy. In a second experiment the training data includes additional subjects with brain hemorrhage on image data of the RSNA Brain CT Hemorrhage Challenge with custom reference segmentations. The resulting networks are evaluated on normal and hemorrhage test casesseparately, and on an independent test set of patients with brain tumors of the publicly available GLIS-RT dataset.

Results: Adding data with hemorrhage to the training set significantly improves the segmentation performance over an algorithm trained exclusively on normally appearing data, not only in the hemorrhage test set but also in the tumor test set. The performance on normally appearing data is stable. Overall, the improved algorithm achieves median Dice scores of 0.98 (parenchyma), 0.91 (left ventricle), 0.90 (right ventricle), 0.81 (third ventricle), and 0.80 (fourth ventricle) on the hemorrhage test set. On the tumor test set, the median Dice scores are 0.96 (parenchyma), 0.90 (left ventricle), 0.90 (right ventricle), 0.75 (third ventricle), and 0.73 (fourth ventricle).

Conclusion: Training on an extended data set that includes pathologies is crucial and significantly increases the overall robustness of a segmentation algorithm for brain parenchyma and ventricular system in CT data, also for anomalies completely unseen during training. Extension of the training set to include other diseases may further improve the generalizability of the algorithm.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信