居民主导的研究:一个质量改进项目,以提高严重疾病的谈话。

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-10 DOI:10.1080/02701960.2023.2246406
Arinea Salas, KerriAnn Boanca, Johanna Purdy, Bryanna De Lima, Mara Peterson, Reed Nerness, Elizabeth Eckstrom, Amy Kwon
{"title":"居民主导的研究:一个质量改进项目,以提高严重疾病的谈话。","authors":"Arinea Salas, KerriAnn Boanca, Johanna Purdy, Bryanna De Lima, Mara Peterson, Reed Nerness, Elizabeth Eckstrom, Amy Kwon","doi":"10.1080/02701960.2023.2246406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Skilled conversations regarding end-of-life (EOL) care reduce emotional suffering and increase goal-concordant care. The Ariadne Labs Serious Illness Conversation (SIC) framework is an effective tool for improving EOL communication, but research is lacking on use with resident physicians. This study led by internal medicine residents tested the feasibility and acceptability of training peers in SIC. In 2021, three resident project leaders recruited first and second year internal medicine residents at a single tertiary academic center to receive extracurricular training on the Ariadne Labs SIC Guide. Baseline and post-training surveys were conducted to determine attitudes, barriers, and confidence related to EOL discussions. Initial recruitment efforts were unsuccessful but participation increased from zero to seven after residency administrators approved protected time for SIC training. Six residents (85.7%) completed baseline and post-training surveys. Residents identified lack of time as the key barrier to initiating SIC. Self-reported comfort discussing EOL care and documenting the conversations improved after training. Both resident researchers and participants reported SIC training was valuable and successful. Institutional support with dedicated buy-in, strong faculty mentorship, and committed resident leaders all contribute to successfully implementing a resident-led project.</p>","PeriodicalId":46431,"journal":{"name":"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION","volume":" ","pages":"499-504"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resident-led research: A quality improvement project to improve serious illness conversations.\",\"authors\":\"Arinea Salas, KerriAnn Boanca, Johanna Purdy, Bryanna De Lima, Mara Peterson, Reed Nerness, Elizabeth Eckstrom, Amy Kwon\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02701960.2023.2246406\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Skilled conversations regarding end-of-life (EOL) care reduce emotional suffering and increase goal-concordant care. The Ariadne Labs Serious Illness Conversation (SIC) framework is an effective tool for improving EOL communication, but research is lacking on use with resident physicians. This study led by internal medicine residents tested the feasibility and acceptability of training peers in SIC. In 2021, three resident project leaders recruited first and second year internal medicine residents at a single tertiary academic center to receive extracurricular training on the Ariadne Labs SIC Guide. Baseline and post-training surveys were conducted to determine attitudes, barriers, and confidence related to EOL discussions. Initial recruitment efforts were unsuccessful but participation increased from zero to seven after residency administrators approved protected time for SIC training. Six residents (85.7%) completed baseline and post-training surveys. Residents identified lack of time as the key barrier to initiating SIC. Self-reported comfort discussing EOL care and documenting the conversations improved after training. Both resident researchers and participants reported SIC training was valuable and successful. Institutional support with dedicated buy-in, strong faculty mentorship, and committed resident leaders all contribute to successfully implementing a resident-led project.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"499-504\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2023.2246406\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2023.2246406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于生命末期(EOL)护理的熟练对话减少了情绪痛苦,增加了目标和谐的护理。Ariadne实验室重病对话(SIC)框架是改善EOL沟通的有效工具,但缺乏与住院医师使用的研究。本研究以内科住院医师为主导,考察了在SIC中培训同伴的可行性和可接受性。2021年,三位住院医师项目负责人在一个高等教育学术中心招募了一年级和二年级的内科住院医师,接受阿里阿德涅实验室SIC指南的课外培训。进行基线和培训后调查,以确定与EOL讨论相关的态度、障碍和信心。最初的招募工作不成功,但在住院医师管理员批准了SIC培训的保护时间后,参与人数从0人增加到7人。6名住院医师(85.7%)完成了基线和培训后调查。居民认为缺乏时间是启动SIC的主要障碍。自我报告的舒适度,讨论EOL护理和记录谈话在训练后有所改善。驻地研究人员和参与者都报告说,SIC培训是有价值的和成功的。机构支持与专门的买入,强大的教师指导,以及忠诚的居民领导都有助于成功实施居民领导的项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Resident-led research: A quality improvement project to improve serious illness conversations.

Skilled conversations regarding end-of-life (EOL) care reduce emotional suffering and increase goal-concordant care. The Ariadne Labs Serious Illness Conversation (SIC) framework is an effective tool for improving EOL communication, but research is lacking on use with resident physicians. This study led by internal medicine residents tested the feasibility and acceptability of training peers in SIC. In 2021, three resident project leaders recruited first and second year internal medicine residents at a single tertiary academic center to receive extracurricular training on the Ariadne Labs SIC Guide. Baseline and post-training surveys were conducted to determine attitudes, barriers, and confidence related to EOL discussions. Initial recruitment efforts were unsuccessful but participation increased from zero to seven after residency administrators approved protected time for SIC training. Six residents (85.7%) completed baseline and post-training surveys. Residents identified lack of time as the key barrier to initiating SIC. Self-reported comfort discussing EOL care and documenting the conversations improved after training. Both resident researchers and participants reported SIC training was valuable and successful. Institutional support with dedicated buy-in, strong faculty mentorship, and committed resident leaders all contribute to successfully implementing a resident-led project.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION
GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
18.80%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Gerontology & Geriatrics Education is geared toward the exchange of information related to research, curriculum development, course and program evaluation, classroom and practice innovation, and other topics with educational implications for gerontology and geriatrics. It is designed to appeal to a broad range of students, teachers, practitioners, administrators, and policy makers and is dedicated to improving awareness of best practices and resources for gerontologists and gerontology/geriatrics educators. Peer Review Policy: All research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by two anonymous referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信