创伤后认知量表(PTCI):严重精神疾病合并PTSD患者的心理测量特征。

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Weili Lu, Kim T Mueser, Philip T Yanos, Amanda Siriram, Yuane Jia, Alyssa Leong, Steven M Silverstein, Jennifer Gottlieb, Mary K Jankowski
{"title":"创伤后认知量表(PTCI):严重精神疾病合并PTSD患者的心理测量特征。","authors":"Weili Lu,&nbsp;Kim T Mueser,&nbsp;Philip T Yanos,&nbsp;Amanda Siriram,&nbsp;Yuane Jia,&nbsp;Alyssa Leong,&nbsp;Steven M Silverstein,&nbsp;Jennifer Gottlieb,&nbsp;Mary K Jankowski","doi":"10.1017/S1352465823000140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) exhibit negative cognitions, predictive of PTSD severity. The Post-Traumatic Cognitions Inventory (PTCI) is a widely used instrument measuring trauma-related cognitions and beliefs with three subscales: negative thoughts of self (SELF), negative cognitions about the world (WORLD), and self-blame (BLAME).</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The current study attempted to validate the use of the PTCI in people with serious mental illness (SMI), who have greater exposure to trauma and elevated rates of PTSD, using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and examining convergent and divergent correlations with relevant constructs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants were 432 individuals with SMI and co-occurring PTSD diagnosis based on the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale, who completed PTCI and other clinical ratings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CFAs provided adequate support for Foa's three-factor model (SELF, WORLD, BLAME), and adequate support for Sexton's four-factor model that also included a COPE subscale. Both models achieved measurement invariance at configural, metric and scalar levels for three diagnostic groups: schizophrenia, bipolar and major depression, as well as for ethnicity (White <i>vs</i> Black), and gender (male <i>vs</i> female). Validity of both models was supported by significant correlations between PTCI subscales, and self-reported and clinician assessed PTSD symptoms and associated symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings provide support for the psychometric properties of the PTCI and the conceptualization of Sexton's four-factor and Foa's three-factor models of PTCI among individuals diagnosed with SMI (Foa <i>et al</i>., ).</p>","PeriodicalId":47936,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-Traumatic Cognitions Inventory (PTCI): psychometric properties in clients with serious mental illness and co-occurring PTSD.\",\"authors\":\"Weili Lu,&nbsp;Kim T Mueser,&nbsp;Philip T Yanos,&nbsp;Amanda Siriram,&nbsp;Yuane Jia,&nbsp;Alyssa Leong,&nbsp;Steven M Silverstein,&nbsp;Jennifer Gottlieb,&nbsp;Mary K Jankowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1352465823000140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) exhibit negative cognitions, predictive of PTSD severity. The Post-Traumatic Cognitions Inventory (PTCI) is a widely used instrument measuring trauma-related cognitions and beliefs with three subscales: negative thoughts of self (SELF), negative cognitions about the world (WORLD), and self-blame (BLAME).</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The current study attempted to validate the use of the PTCI in people with serious mental illness (SMI), who have greater exposure to trauma and elevated rates of PTSD, using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and examining convergent and divergent correlations with relevant constructs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants were 432 individuals with SMI and co-occurring PTSD diagnosis based on the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale, who completed PTCI and other clinical ratings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CFAs provided adequate support for Foa's three-factor model (SELF, WORLD, BLAME), and adequate support for Sexton's four-factor model that also included a COPE subscale. Both models achieved measurement invariance at configural, metric and scalar levels for three diagnostic groups: schizophrenia, bipolar and major depression, as well as for ethnicity (White <i>vs</i> Black), and gender (male <i>vs</i> female). Validity of both models was supported by significant correlations between PTCI subscales, and self-reported and clinician assessed PTSD symptoms and associated symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings provide support for the psychometric properties of the PTCI and the conceptualization of Sexton's four-factor and Foa's three-factor models of PTCI among individuals diagnosed with SMI (Foa <i>et al</i>., ).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465823000140\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465823000140","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)患者表现出负面认知,预示着PTSD的严重程度。创伤后认知量表(PTCI)是一种广泛使用的创伤相关认知和信念测量工具,它有三个子量表:自我消极思想(self)、对世界的消极认知(world)和自责(BLAME)。目的:目前的研究试图验证PTCI在严重精神疾病(SMI)患者中的应用,这些患者有更大的创伤暴露和更高的PTSD发病率,使用验证性因子分析(CFA)并检查与相关构念的收敛和发散相关性。方法:选取432名重度精神障碍患者,并根据临床医师管理的PTSD量表(Clinician Administered PTSD Scale)诊断为合并PTSD,完成PTCI和其他临床评分。结果:cfa对Foa的三因素模型(SELF, WORLD, BLAME)提供了足够的支持,对Sexton的四因素模型(也包括COPE子量表)提供了足够的支持。这两种模型在三个诊断组:精神分裂症、双相情感障碍和重度抑郁症,以及种族(白人与黑人)和性别(男性与女性)的结构、度量和标量水平上都实现了测量不变性。PTCI量表、自我报告和临床医生评估的PTSD症状及相关症状之间的显著相关性支持了这两个模型的有效性。结论:研究结果支持了重度精神分裂症患者PTCI的心理测量特性以及Sexton的四因素和Foa的三因素PTCI模型的概念化(Foa等人,)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Post-Traumatic Cognitions Inventory (PTCI): psychometric properties in clients with serious mental illness and co-occurring PTSD.

Background: People with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) exhibit negative cognitions, predictive of PTSD severity. The Post-Traumatic Cognitions Inventory (PTCI) is a widely used instrument measuring trauma-related cognitions and beliefs with three subscales: negative thoughts of self (SELF), negative cognitions about the world (WORLD), and self-blame (BLAME).

Aims: The current study attempted to validate the use of the PTCI in people with serious mental illness (SMI), who have greater exposure to trauma and elevated rates of PTSD, using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and examining convergent and divergent correlations with relevant constructs.

Method: Participants were 432 individuals with SMI and co-occurring PTSD diagnosis based on the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale, who completed PTCI and other clinical ratings.

Results: CFAs provided adequate support for Foa's three-factor model (SELF, WORLD, BLAME), and adequate support for Sexton's four-factor model that also included a COPE subscale. Both models achieved measurement invariance at configural, metric and scalar levels for three diagnostic groups: schizophrenia, bipolar and major depression, as well as for ethnicity (White vs Black), and gender (male vs female). Validity of both models was supported by significant correlations between PTCI subscales, and self-reported and clinician assessed PTSD symptoms and associated symptoms.

Conclusions: Findings provide support for the psychometric properties of the PTCI and the conceptualization of Sexton's four-factor and Foa's three-factor models of PTCI among individuals diagnosed with SMI (Foa et al., ).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: An international multidisciplinary journal aimed primarily at members of the helping and teaching professions. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy features original research papers, covering both experimental and clinical work, that contribute to the theory, practice and evolution of cognitive and behaviour therapy. The journal aims to reflect and influence the continuing changes in the concepts, methodology, and techniques of behavioural and cognitive psychotherapy. A particular feature of the journal is its broad ranging scope - both in terms of topics and types of study covered. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy encompasses most areas of human behaviour and experience, and represents many different research methods, from randomized controlled trials to detailed case studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信