风湿性心脏病患者瓣膜病变的主动脉血流动力学模拟

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS
Hannah L Cebull, Olukayode O Aremu, Radhika S Kulkarni, Samuel X Zhang, Petronella Samuels, Stephen Jermy, Ntobeko A B Ntusi, Craig J Goergen
{"title":"风湿性心脏病患者瓣膜病变的主动脉血流动力学模拟","authors":"Hannah L Cebull, Olukayode O Aremu, Radhika S Kulkarni, Samuel X Zhang, Petronella Samuels, Stephen Jermy, Ntobeko A B Ntusi, Craig J Goergen","doi":"10.1115/1.4063000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is a neglected tropical disease despite the substantial global health burden. In this study, we aimed to develop a lower cost method of modeling aortic blood flow using subject-specific velocity profiles, aiding our understanding of RHD's consequences on the structure and function of the ascending aorta. Echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) are often used for diagnosis, including valve dysfunction assessments. However, there is a need to further characterize aortic valve lesions to improve treatment options and timing for patients, while using accessible and affordable imaging strategies. Here, we simulated effects of RHD aortic valve lesions on the aorta using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). We hypothesized that inlet velocity distribution and wall shear stress (WSS) will differ between RHD and non-RHD individuals, as well as between subject-specific and standard Womersley velocity profiles. Phase-contrast CMR data from South Africa of six RHD subjects with aortic stenosis and/or regurgitation and six matched controls were used to estimate subject-specific velocity inlet profiles and the mean velocity for Womersley profiles. Our findings were twofold. First, we found WSS in subject-specific RHD was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than control subject simulations, while Womersley simulation groups did not differ. Second, evaluating spatial velocity differences (ΔSV) between simulation types revealed that simulations of RHD had significantly higher ΔSV than non-RHD (p < 0.05), these results highlight the need for implementing subject-specific input into RHD CFD, which we demonstrate how to accomplish through accessible methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":54871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10405283/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simulating Subject-Specific Aortic Hemodynamic Effects of Valvular Lesions in Rheumatic Heart Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Hannah L Cebull, Olukayode O Aremu, Radhika S Kulkarni, Samuel X Zhang, Petronella Samuels, Stephen Jermy, Ntobeko A B Ntusi, Craig J Goergen\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4063000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is a neglected tropical disease despite the substantial global health burden. In this study, we aimed to develop a lower cost method of modeling aortic blood flow using subject-specific velocity profiles, aiding our understanding of RHD's consequences on the structure and function of the ascending aorta. Echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) are often used for diagnosis, including valve dysfunction assessments. However, there is a need to further characterize aortic valve lesions to improve treatment options and timing for patients, while using accessible and affordable imaging strategies. Here, we simulated effects of RHD aortic valve lesions on the aorta using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). We hypothesized that inlet velocity distribution and wall shear stress (WSS) will differ between RHD and non-RHD individuals, as well as between subject-specific and standard Womersley velocity profiles. Phase-contrast CMR data from South Africa of six RHD subjects with aortic stenosis and/or regurgitation and six matched controls were used to estimate subject-specific velocity inlet profiles and the mean velocity for Womersley profiles. Our findings were twofold. First, we found WSS in subject-specific RHD was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than control subject simulations, while Womersley simulation groups did not differ. Second, evaluating spatial velocity differences (ΔSV) between simulation types revealed that simulations of RHD had significantly higher ΔSV than non-RHD (p < 0.05), these results highlight the need for implementing subject-specific input into RHD CFD, which we demonstrate how to accomplish through accessible methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10405283/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063000\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063000","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

风湿性心脏病(RHD)是一种被忽视的热带疾病,尽管它给全球带来了巨大的健康负担。在这项研究中,我们旨在开发一种使用受试者特定速度剖面模拟主动脉血流的低成本方法,帮助我们理解RHD对升主动脉结构和功能的影响。超声心动图和心血管磁共振(CMR)通常用于诊断,包括瓣膜功能障碍评估。然而,有必要进一步表征主动脉瓣病变,以改善患者的治疗选择和时机,同时使用可获得和负担得起的成像策略。在这里,我们使用计算流体动力学(CFD)模拟了RHD主动脉瓣病变对主动脉的影响。我们假设RHD和非RHD个体之间的入口速度分布和壁剪切应力(WSS),以及受试者特定和标准Womersley速度分布之间的差异。使用来自南非的6名患有主动脉狭窄和/或反流的RHD受试者和6名匹配对照的相位对比CMR数据来估计受试者的特定速度入口曲线和Womersley曲线的平均速度。我们的发现有两个方面。首先,我们发现在受试者特异性RHD中WSS显著更高(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simulating Subject-Specific Aortic Hemodynamic Effects of Valvular Lesions in Rheumatic Heart Disease.

Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is a neglected tropical disease despite the substantial global health burden. In this study, we aimed to develop a lower cost method of modeling aortic blood flow using subject-specific velocity profiles, aiding our understanding of RHD's consequences on the structure and function of the ascending aorta. Echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) are often used for diagnosis, including valve dysfunction assessments. However, there is a need to further characterize aortic valve lesions to improve treatment options and timing for patients, while using accessible and affordable imaging strategies. Here, we simulated effects of RHD aortic valve lesions on the aorta using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). We hypothesized that inlet velocity distribution and wall shear stress (WSS) will differ between RHD and non-RHD individuals, as well as between subject-specific and standard Womersley velocity profiles. Phase-contrast CMR data from South Africa of six RHD subjects with aortic stenosis and/or regurgitation and six matched controls were used to estimate subject-specific velocity inlet profiles and the mean velocity for Womersley profiles. Our findings were twofold. First, we found WSS in subject-specific RHD was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than control subject simulations, while Womersley simulation groups did not differ. Second, evaluating spatial velocity differences (ΔSV) between simulation types revealed that simulations of RHD had significantly higher ΔSV than non-RHD (p < 0.05), these results highlight the need for implementing subject-specific input into RHD CFD, which we demonstrate how to accomplish through accessible methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
169
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Artificial Organs and Prostheses; Bioinstrumentation and Measurements; Bioheat Transfer; Biomaterials; Biomechanics; Bioprocess Engineering; Cellular Mechanics; Design and Control of Biological Systems; Physiological Systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信