非裔美国人参与记忆与衰老观察研究的特定年龄障碍和促进因素。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Nicole R Nissim, Michelle R Fudge, Christian Lachner, Ganesh M Babulal, Megan A Allyse, Neill R Graff-Radford, John A Lucas, Gregory S Day
{"title":"非裔美国人参与记忆与衰老观察研究的特定年龄障碍和促进因素。","authors":"Nicole R Nissim, Michelle R Fudge, Christian Lachner, Ganesh M Babulal, Megan A Allyse, Neill R Graff-Radford, John A Lucas, Gregory S Day","doi":"10.1007/s40615-023-01741-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Black/African Americans experience a high burden of Alzheimer disease and related dementias yet are critically underrepresented in corresponding research. Understanding barriers and facilitators to research participation among younger and older African Americans is necessary to inform age-specific strategies to promote equity in studies of early- and late-onset neurodegenerative diseases.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Survey respondents (n = 240) rated barriers and facilitators of research participation. Age-specific differences were evaluated using nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis tests across respondents aged 18-44 years (n = 76), 45-64 years (n = 83), and ≥ 65 years (n = 81). Strategies to mitigate barriers and promote facilitators were further explored via community-based focus groups. Pooled frequency of common themes discussed in focus groups were evaluated and compared across different ages including ≥ 45 years, ≥ 65 years, and mixed ages ≥ 45 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Younger respondents (aged 18-44 and 45-64 years) expressed a greater need for flexibility in when, where, and how research testing takes place versus adults ≥ 65 years. Focus groups emphasized long-lasting consequences of systemic racism and the need to build and foster trust to resolve barriers and promote research engagement amongst African Americans.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Age-specific strategies are needed to increase engagement, address recruitment disparities, and promote retention of African American participants in memory and aging studies across the lifespan.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10853486/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Age-Specific Barriers and Facilitators to Research Participation Amongst African Americans in Observational Studies of Memory and Aging.\",\"authors\":\"Nicole R Nissim, Michelle R Fudge, Christian Lachner, Ganesh M Babulal, Megan A Allyse, Neill R Graff-Radford, John A Lucas, Gregory S Day\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40615-023-01741-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Black/African Americans experience a high burden of Alzheimer disease and related dementias yet are critically underrepresented in corresponding research. Understanding barriers and facilitators to research participation among younger and older African Americans is necessary to inform age-specific strategies to promote equity in studies of early- and late-onset neurodegenerative diseases.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Survey respondents (n = 240) rated barriers and facilitators of research participation. Age-specific differences were evaluated using nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis tests across respondents aged 18-44 years (n = 76), 45-64 years (n = 83), and ≥ 65 years (n = 81). Strategies to mitigate barriers and promote facilitators were further explored via community-based focus groups. Pooled frequency of common themes discussed in focus groups were evaluated and compared across different ages including ≥ 45 years, ≥ 65 years, and mixed ages ≥ 45 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Younger respondents (aged 18-44 and 45-64 years) expressed a greater need for flexibility in when, where, and how research testing takes place versus adults ≥ 65 years. Focus groups emphasized long-lasting consequences of systemic racism and the need to build and foster trust to resolve barriers and promote research engagement amongst African Americans.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Age-specific strategies are needed to increase engagement, address recruitment disparities, and promote retention of African American participants in memory and aging studies across the lifespan.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10853486/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-023-01741-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-023-01741-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:美国黑人/非裔美国人罹患阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症的比例很高,但他们在相应研究中的代表性却严重不足。有必要了解年轻和年长的非裔美国人参与研究的障碍和促进因素,以便为促进早发和晚发神经退行性疾病研究公平的特定年龄策略提供信息:研究设计:调查对象(n = 240)对参与研究的障碍和促进因素进行评分。采用非参数 Kruskal-Wallis 检验对 18-44 岁(n = 76)、45-64 岁(n = 83)和≥ 65 岁(n = 81)受访者的年龄差异进行评估。通过社区焦点小组进一步探讨了减少障碍和促进因素的策略。对焦点小组讨论的共同主题的汇总频率进行了评估,并对不同年龄段(包括≥ 45 岁、≥ 65 岁以及≥ 45 岁的混合年龄段)进行了比较:结果:年轻受访者(18-44 岁和 45-64 岁)与年龄≥ 65 岁的成年人相比,在何时、何地以及如何进行研究测试方面更需要灵活性。焦点小组强调了系统性种族主义的长期后果以及建立和促进信任的必要性,以解决障碍并促进非裔美国人参与研究:讨论:需要制定针对不同年龄段的策略,以提高非裔美国人的参与度,解决招募差异问题,并促进非裔美国人继续参与整个生命周期的记忆和老龄化研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Age-Specific Barriers and Facilitators to Research Participation Amongst African Americans in Observational Studies of Memory and Aging.

Background: Black/African Americans experience a high burden of Alzheimer disease and related dementias yet are critically underrepresented in corresponding research. Understanding barriers and facilitators to research participation among younger and older African Americans is necessary to inform age-specific strategies to promote equity in studies of early- and late-onset neurodegenerative diseases.

Study design: Survey respondents (n = 240) rated barriers and facilitators of research participation. Age-specific differences were evaluated using nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis tests across respondents aged 18-44 years (n = 76), 45-64 years (n = 83), and ≥ 65 years (n = 81). Strategies to mitigate barriers and promote facilitators were further explored via community-based focus groups. Pooled frequency of common themes discussed in focus groups were evaluated and compared across different ages including ≥ 45 years, ≥ 65 years, and mixed ages ≥ 45 years.

Results: Younger respondents (aged 18-44 and 45-64 years) expressed a greater need for flexibility in when, where, and how research testing takes place versus adults ≥ 65 years. Focus groups emphasized long-lasting consequences of systemic racism and the need to build and foster trust to resolve barriers and promote research engagement amongst African Americans.

Discussion: Age-specific strategies are needed to increase engagement, address recruitment disparities, and promote retention of African American participants in memory and aging studies across the lifespan.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
263
期刊介绍: Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信